Back to Search Start Over

Perceptions, Uses, and Interpretations of Uncertainty in Current Weather Forecasts by Spanish Undergraduate Students

Authors :
Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Física Aplicada
Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef"
Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Análisis Geográfico Regional y Geografía Física
Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Interuniversitario de Geografía
Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la Señal
Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Universitario de Física Aplicada a las Ciencias y las Tecnologías
Gómez, Igor
Molina-Palacios, Sergio
Olcina, Jorge
Galiana-Merino, Juan José
Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Física Aplicada
Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef"
Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Análisis Geográfico Regional y Geografía Física
Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Interuniversitario de Geografía
Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la Señal
Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Universitario de Física Aplicada a las Ciencias y las Tecnologías
Gómez, Igor
Molina-Palacios, Sergio
Olcina, Jorge
Galiana-Merino, Juan José
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

This quantitative study evaluates how 71 Spanish undergraduate students perceive and interpret the uncertainty inherent to deterministic forecasts. It is based on several questions that asked participants what they expect given a forecast presented under the deterministic paradigm for a specific lead time and a particular weather parameter. In this regard, both normal and extreme weather conditions were studied. Students’ responses to the temperature forecast as it is usually presented in the media expect an uncertainty range of ±1°–2°C. For wind speed, uncertainty shows a deviation of ±5–10 km h−1, and the uncertainty range assigned to the precipitation amount shows a deviation of ±30 mm from the specific value provided in a deterministic format. Participants perceive the minimum night temperatures as the least-biased parameter from the deterministic forecast, while the amount of rain is perceived as the most-biased one. In addition, participants were then asked about their probabilistic threshold for taking appropriate precautionary action under distinct decision-making scenarios of temperature, wind speed, and rain. Results indicate that participants have different probabilistic thresholds for taking protective action and that context and presentation influence forecast use. Participants were also asked about the meaning of the probability-of-precipitation (PoP) forecast. Around 40% of responses reformulated the default options, and around 20% selected the correct answer, following previous studies related to this research topic. As a general result, it has been found that participants infer uncertainty into deterministic forecasts, and they are mostly used to take action in the presence of decision-making scenarios. In contrast, more difficulties were found when interpreting probabilistic forecasts.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1238087158
Document Type :
Electronic Resource