Back to Search Start Over

Mixed-methods economic evaluation of the implementation of tobacco treatment programs in National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

Authors :
Salloum, Ramzi G
Salloum, Ramzi G
D'Angelo, Heather
Theis, Ryan P
Rolland, Betsy
Hohl, Sarah
Pauk, Danielle
LeLaurin, Jennifer H
Asvat, Yasmin
Chen, Li-Shiun
Day, Andrew T
Goldstein, Adam O
Hitsman, Brian
Hudson, Deborah
King, Andrea C
Lam, Cho Y
Lenhoff, Katie
Levinson, Arnold H
Prochaska, Judith
Smieliauskas, Fabrice
Taylor, Kathryn
Thomas, Janet
Tindle, Hilary
Tong, Elisa
White, Justin S
Vogel, W Bruce
Warren, Graham W
Fiore, Michael
Salloum, Ramzi G
Salloum, Ramzi G
D'Angelo, Heather
Theis, Ryan P
Rolland, Betsy
Hohl, Sarah
Pauk, Danielle
LeLaurin, Jennifer H
Asvat, Yasmin
Chen, Li-Shiun
Day, Andrew T
Goldstein, Adam O
Hitsman, Brian
Hudson, Deborah
King, Andrea C
Lam, Cho Y
Lenhoff, Katie
Levinson, Arnold H
Prochaska, Judith
Smieliauskas, Fabrice
Taylor, Kathryn
Thomas, Janet
Tindle, Hilary
Tong, Elisa
White, Justin S
Vogel, W Bruce
Warren, Graham W
Fiore, Michael
Source :
Implementation science communications; vol 2, iss 1, 41; 2662-2211
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BackgroundThe Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I) was launched in 2017 as a part of the NCI Cancer Moonshot program to assist NCI-designated cancer centers in developing tobacco treatment programs for oncology patients. Participating centers have implemented varied evidence-based programs that fit their institutional resources and needs, offering a wide range of services including in-person and telephone-based counseling, point of care, interactive voice response systems, referral to the quitline, text- and web-based services, and medications.MethodsWe used a mixed methods comparative case study design to evaluate system-level implementation costs across 15 C3I-funded cancer centers that reported for at least one 6-month period between July 2018 and June 2020. We analyzed operating costs by resource category (e.g., personnel, medications) concurrently with transcripts from semi-structured key-informant interviews conducted during site visits. Personnel salary costs were estimated using Bureau of Labor Statistics wage data adjusted for area and occupation, and non-wage benefits. Qualitative findings provided additional information on intangible resources and contextual factors related to implementation costs.ResultsMedian total monthly operating costs across funded centers were $11,045 (range: $5129-$20,751). The largest median operating cost category was personnel ($10,307; range: $4122-$19,794), with the highest personnel costs attributable to the provision of in-person program services. Monthly (non-zero) cost ranges for other categories were medications ($17-$573), materials ($6-$435), training ($96-$516), technology ($171-$2759), and equipment ($10-$620). Median cost-per-participant was $466 (range: $70-$2093) and cost-per-quit was $2688 (range: $330-$9628), with sites offering different combinations of program components, ranging from individually-delivered in-person counseling only to one program that offered all components. Site interviews provided conte

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Implementation science communications; vol 2, iss 1, 41; 2662-2211
Notes :
application/pdf, Implementation science communications vol 2, iss 1, 41 2662-2211
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1277078439
Document Type :
Electronic Resource