Back to Search Start Over

Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis

Authors :
Norheim, O.F.
Baltussen, R.M.
Johri, M.
Chisholm, D.
Nord, E.
Brock, D.
Carlsson, P.
Cookson, R.
Daniels, N.
Danis, M.
Fleurbaey, M.
Johansson, K.A.
Kapiriri, L.
Littlejohns, P.
Mbeeli, T.
Rao, K.D.
Edejer, T.T.
Wikler, D.
Norheim, O.F.
Baltussen, R.M.
Johri, M.
Chisholm, D.
Nord, E.
Brock, D.
Carlsson, P.
Cookson, R.
Daniels, N.
Danis, M.
Fleurbaey, M.
Johansson, K.A.
Kapiriri, L.
Littlejohns, P.
Mbeeli, T.
Rao, K.D.
Edejer, T.T.
Wikler, D.
Source :
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation; 18; 1478-7547; 12; ~Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation~18~~~~1478-7547~~12~~
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 138134.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)<br />This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. THE GUIDANCE WAS DEVELOP THROUGH A SERIES OF EXPERT CONSULTATION MEETINGS AND INVOLVED THREE STEPS: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation; 18; 1478-7547; 12; ~Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation~18~~~~1478-7547~~12~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1284155204
Document Type :
Electronic Resource