Back to Search Start Over

A Proposal to Classify and Assess Ecological Status in Mediterranean Temporary Rivers: Research Insights to Solve Management Needs

Authors :
Llorens, Pilar [0000-0003-4591-5303]
Munné, Antoni
Bonada, Núria
Cid, Núria
Gallart Gallego, Francesc
Solà, Carolina
Bardina, Mònica
Rovira, Albert
Sierra, Clara
Soria, María
Fortuño, Pau
Llorens, Pilar
Latron, Jérôme
Estrela, Teodoro
Fidalgo, Arancha
Serrano, Inmaculada
Jiménez, Sara
Vega, Rosa
Prat, Narcís
Llorens, Pilar [0000-0003-4591-5303]
Munné, Antoni
Bonada, Núria
Cid, Núria
Gallart Gallego, Francesc
Solà, Carolina
Bardina, Mònica
Rovira, Albert
Sierra, Clara
Soria, María
Fortuño, Pau
Llorens, Pilar
Latron, Jérôme
Estrela, Teodoro
Fidalgo, Arancha
Serrano, Inmaculada
Jiménez, Sara
Vega, Rosa
Prat, Narcís
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The biomonitoring methods implemented by water authorities are mostly developed for perennial rivers, and do not apply to temporary rivers (TRs). We propose a new classification for TRs to better assess their ecological status. It arises from the LIFE+ TRivers project, which was conducted in the Catalan and the Júcar Mediterranean river basin districts (RBD). The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) provided two systems to set river types (systems A or B from Annex II), which have been officially used by water authorities across Europe to set “national river types” (NRTs). However, essential hydrological variables for TRs are largely omitted. NRTs established according to the WFD were compared with TR categories obtained by using a rainfall-runoff model, “natural flows prescribed regimes” (NFPRs), and with “aquatic phases regimes” (APRs) calculated by using TREHS software. The biological quality indices currently used in Spain, based on macroinvertebrates and diatoms (IBMWP, IMMI-T, and IPS), were compared with a “general degradation” gradient in order to analyze the two TR river classification procedures (NFPR and APR). The results showed that NRTs did not properly classify TRs, and that the APR classification identified ecologically meaningful categories, especially those related to stagnant phases. Four “management temporary river categories” based on APRs are proposed to be used for water managers to properly assess the ecological status of TRs.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1286569423
Document Type :
Electronic Resource