Back to Search Start Over

An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain

Authors :
ReActiv8-B investigators
Christopher Gilligan
Willem Volschenk
Marc Russo
Matthew Green
Christopher Gilmore
Vivek Mehta
Kristiaan Deckers
Kris De Smedt
Usman Latif
Peter Georgius
Jonathan Gentile
Bruce Mitchell
Meredith Langhorst
F.J.P.M. (Frank) Huygen
Ganesan Baranidharan
Vikas Patel
Eugene Mironer
Edgar Ross
Alexios Carayannopoulos
Salim Hayek
Ashish Gulve
Jean Pierre Van Buyten
Antoine Tohmeh
Jeffrey Fischgrund
Shivanand Lad
Farshad Ahadian
Timothy Deer
William Klemme
Richard Rauck
James Rathmell
Robert Levy
Jan Pieter Heemels
Sam Eldabe
ReActiv8-B investigators
Christopher Gilligan
Willem Volschenk
Marc Russo
Matthew Green
Christopher Gilmore
Vivek Mehta
Kristiaan Deckers
Kris De Smedt
Usman Latif
Peter Georgius
Jonathan Gentile
Bruce Mitchell
Meredith Langhorst
F.J.P.M. (Frank) Huygen
Ganesan Baranidharan
Vikas Patel
Eugene Mironer
Edgar Ross
Alexios Carayannopoulos
Salim Hayek
Ashish Gulve
Jean Pierre Van Buyten
Antoine Tohmeh
Jeffrey Fischgrund
Shivanand Lad
Farshad Ahadian
Timothy Deer
William Klemme
Richard Rauck
James Rathmell
Robert Levy
Jan Pieter Heemels
Sam Eldabe
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Chronic low back pain can be caused by impaired control and degeneration of the multifidus muscles and consequent functional instability of the lumbar spine. Available treatment options have limited effectiveness and prognosis is unfavorable. We conducted an international randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial at 26 multidisciplinary centers to determine safety and efficacy of an implantable, restorative neurostimulator designed to restore multifidus neuromuscular control and facilitate relief of symptoms (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02577354). Two hundred four eligible participants with refractory mechanical (musculoskeletal) chronic LBP and a positive prone instability test indicating impaired multifidus control were implanted and randomized to therapeutic (N = 102) or low-level sham (N = 102) stimulation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus nerve (multifidus nerve supply) for 30 minutes twice daily. The primary endpoint was the comparison of responder proportions (≥30% relief on the LBP visual analogue scale without analgesics increase) at 120 days. After the primary endpoint assessment, participants in the sham-control group switched to therapeutic stimulation and the combined cohort was assessed through 1 year for long-term outcomes and adverse events. The primary endpoint was inconclusive in terms of treatment superiority (57.1% vs 46.6%; difference: 10.4%; 95% confidence interval, -3.3% to 24.1%, P = 0.138). Prespecified secondary outcomes and analyses were consistent with a modest but clinically meaningful treatment benefit at 120 days. Improvements from baseline, which continued to accrue in all outcome measures after conclusion of the double-blind phase, were clinically important at 1 year. The incidence of serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (3.9%) compared favorably with other neuromodulation therapies for chronic pain.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
Pain vol. 162 no. 10, pp. 2486-2498
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1287233273
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097.j.pain.0000000000002258