Back to Search Start Over

Automated coronary calcium scoring using deep learning with multicenter external validation.

Authors :
Eng, David
Eng, David
Chute, Christopher
Khandwala, Nishith
Rajpurkar, Pranav
Long, Jin
Shleifer, Sam
Khalaf, Mohamed H
Sandhu, Alexander T
Rodriguez, Fatima
Maron, David J
Seyyedi, Saeed
Marin, Daniele
Golub, Ilana
Budoff, Matthew
Kitamura, Felipe
Takahashi, Marcelo Straus
Filice, Ross W
Shah, Rajesh
Mongan, John
Kallianos, Kimberly
Langlotz, Curtis P
Lungren, Matthew P
Ng, Andrew Y
Patel, Bhavik N
Eng, David
Eng, David
Chute, Christopher
Khandwala, Nishith
Rajpurkar, Pranav
Long, Jin
Shleifer, Sam
Khalaf, Mohamed H
Sandhu, Alexander T
Rodriguez, Fatima
Maron, David J
Seyyedi, Saeed
Marin, Daniele
Golub, Ilana
Budoff, Matthew
Kitamura, Felipe
Takahashi, Marcelo Straus
Filice, Ross W
Shah, Rajesh
Mongan, John
Kallianos, Kimberly
Langlotz, Curtis P
Lungren, Matthew P
Ng, Andrew Y
Patel, Bhavik N
Source :
NPJ digital medicine; vol 4, iss 1, 88; 2398-6352
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD), the most common manifestation of cardiovascular disease, remains the most common cause of mortality in the United States. Risk assessment is key for primary prevention of coronary events and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring using computed tomography (CT) is one such non-invasive tool. Despite the proven clinical value of CAC, the current clinical practice implementation for CAC has limitations such as the lack of insurance coverage for the test, need for capital-intensive CT machines, specialized imaging protocols, and accredited 3D imaging labs for analysis (including personnel and software). Perhaps the greatest gap is the millions of patients who undergo routine chest CT exams and demonstrate coronary artery calcification, but their presence is not often reported or quantitation is not feasible. We present two deep learning models that automate CAC scoring demonstrating advantages in automated scoring for both dedicated gated coronary CT exams and routine non-gated chest CTs performed for other reasons to allow opportunistic screening. First, we trained a gated coronary CT model for CAC scoring that showed near perfect agreement (mean difference in scores = -2.86; Cohen's Kappa = 0.89, P < 0.0001) with current conventional manual scoring on a retrospective dataset of 79 patients and was found to perform the task faster (average time for automated CAC scoring using a graphics processing unit (GPU) was 3.5 ± 2.1 s vs. 261 s for manual scoring) in a prospective trial of 55 patients with little difference in scores compared to three technologists (mean difference in scores = 3.24, 5.12, and 5.48, respectively). Then using CAC scores from paired gated coronary CT as a reference standard, we trained a deep learning model on our internal data and a cohort from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study (total training n = 341, Stanford test n = 42, MESA test n = 46) to perform CAC scoring on routine non-gated chest CT e

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
NPJ digital medicine; vol 4, iss 1, 88; 2398-6352
Notes :
application/pdf, NPJ digital medicine vol 4, iss 1, 88 2398-6352
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1287312150
Document Type :
Electronic Resource