Back to Search Start Over

Association Between Surgeon Scorecard Use and Operating Room Costs.

Authors :
Zygourakis, Corinna C
Zygourakis, Corinna C
Valencia, Victoria
Moriates, Christopher
Boscardin, Christy K
Catschegn, Sereina
Rajkomar, Alvin
Bozic, Kevin J
Soo Hoo, Kent
Goldberg, Andrew N
Pitts, Lawrence
Lawton, Michael T
Dudley, R Adams
Gonzales, Ralph
Zygourakis, Corinna C
Zygourakis, Corinna C
Valencia, Victoria
Moriates, Christopher
Boscardin, Christy K
Catschegn, Sereina
Rajkomar, Alvin
Bozic, Kevin J
Soo Hoo, Kent
Goldberg, Andrew N
Pitts, Lawrence
Lawton, Michael T
Dudley, R Adams
Gonzales, Ralph
Source :
JAMA surgery; vol 152, iss 3, 284-291; 2168-6254
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

ImportanceDespite the significant contribution of surgical spending to health care costs, most surgeons are unaware of their operating room costs.ObjectiveTo examine the association between providing surgeons with individualized cost feedback and surgical supply costs in the operating room.Design, setting, and participantsThe OR Surgical Cost Reduction (OR SCORE) project was a single-health system, multihospital, multidepartmental prospective controlled study in an urban academic setting. Intervention participants were attending surgeons in orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, and neurological surgery (n = 63). Control participants were attending surgeons in cardiothoracic surgery, general surgery, vascular surgery, pediatric surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, ophthalmology, and urology (n = 186).InterventionsFrom January 1 to December 31, 2015, each surgeon in the intervention group received standardized monthly scorecards showing the median surgical supply direct cost for each procedure type performed in the prior month compared with the surgeon's baseline (July 1, 2012, to November 30, 2014) and compared with all surgeons at the institution performing the same procedure at baseline. All surgical departments were eligible for a financial incentive if they met a 5% cost reduction goal.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was each group's median surgical supply cost per case. Secondary outcome measures included total departmental surgical supply costs, case mix index-adjusted median surgical supply costs, patient outcomes (30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, and discharge status), and surgeon responses to a postintervention study-specific health care value survey.ResultsThe median surgical supply direct costs per case decreased 6.54% in the intervention group, from $1398 (interquartile range [IQR], $316-$5181) (10 637 cases) in 2014 to $1307 (IQR, $319-$5037) (11 820 cases) in 2015. In contrast, the median surgical supply direct cost inc

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
JAMA surgery; vol 152, iss 3, 284-291; 2168-6254
Notes :
application/pdf, JAMA surgery vol 152, iss 3, 284-291 2168-6254
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1287350355
Document Type :
Electronic Resource