Back to Search Start Over

Direct costs analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment using a population-based Melbourne clinical cohort.

Authors :
Lubel J.
Kronborg I.
Desmond P.
Knight V.
Kemp W.
Ryan M.
Arachchi N.
Hong T.P.
Gow P.
Fink M.
Roberts S.
Nicoll A.
Dev A.
Bell S.
Thompson A.J.
Lubel J.
Kronborg I.
Desmond P.
Knight V.
Kemp W.
Ryan M.
Arachchi N.
Hong T.P.
Gow P.
Fink M.
Roberts S.
Nicoll A.
Dev A.
Bell S.
Thompson A.J.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Introduction: Many developed countries have identified the increasing incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as targets for intervention, with various preventive, early detection, and therapeutic options available. Current cost-benefit analyses that inform reimbursement of new therapeutic agents have been derived from administrative databases. We provide real-world costing for a clinical population of patients with HCC. Method(s): Patients were prospectively recruited over a 1-year period, in a previously published population-based clinical cohort from Melbourne, Australia. Direct costings were derived from hospitals for admissions, outpatients, and emergency attendance for 24 months of follow-up. Analysis was performed by phases of disease: initial phase (3 months before to 1 month after diagnosis), terminal phase (6 months before death), and continuing phase (time in between). Result(s): There were 136 patients from three tertiary hospitals, including the state liver transplant unit, representing 50% of the original cohort included in the costings. The total cost of treatment was $6 663 149 over 24 months, with a median total cost of $6046 in the initial phase, $33 737 in the continuing phase, and $19 395 in the terminal phase. The majority of costs were incurred by inpatient episodes (69%), with emergency attendance 22%, and outpatients 9%. Liver transplantation was most expensive overall, with best overall survival (21% of total costs, eight patients, median cost, $199 924; median survival, 24 months), followed by local ablation (19%, 20 patients, $31 011; 19 months), transarterial chemoembolization (15%, 24 patients, $41 576; 18 months), best supportive care (14%, 29 patients, $19 856; 3 months), resection (11%, 19 patients, $43 908; 20 months), and sorafenib (6%, 17 patients, $16 216; 13 months). Treatment received and Child-Pugh score at diagnosis were significant (P < 0.001) predictors of high cost on multivariate analysis. Tumor stage did

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1305127599
Document Type :
Electronic Resource