Back to Search Start Over

18. The Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Lymphoma Flagship.

Authors :
Hawkes E.
Dickinson M.
Gaff C.
Opat S.
Shortt J.
Corboy G.
Gregory G.
Casan J.
Wong J.
Wight J.
Prince M.
Blombery P.
Hawkes E.
Dickinson M.
Gaff C.
Opat S.
Shortt J.
Corboy G.
Gregory G.
Casan J.
Wong J.
Wight J.
Prince M.
Blombery P.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) encompasses a genomically heterogeneous group of diseases; some subtypes may be characterised by somatically acquired variants. There is increasing evidence genomic and/or transcriptomic characterisation of NHL informs better patient management, but a health economic argument is required to justify inclusion in routine clinical practice. The Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Lymphoma flagship, a collaboration between three Melbourne-based health services, investigated the role of exome sequencing in the management of aggressive or poor prognosis Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The flagship assessed variants leading to alterations of prognosis, diagnosis or therapy which would potentially lead to management changes, consistent with AMP/ASCO/CAP consensus guidelines. The flagship also investigated associated health economic implications. A total of 122 patients were enrolled on the flagship, of whom 91 (76%) were suitable for testing, the majority of testing exclusions were due to insufficient availability of template for testing, reinforcing the importance of pre-analytical sample collection aspects. Paired tumour/germline exomes were interrogated across 150 candidate genes including parallel copy number analysis. Limited orthogonal testing was conducted with a diagnostically accredited targeted sequencing panel and the Illumina 850K SNP microarray to confirm result validity. The majority of the cohort was comprised of de novo (44%) or transformed DLBCL (15%) cases. A mean of 10.6 somatic variants per patient were detected, of which 50% were classified as tier I variants. A number needed to test to potentially change management of <2 was calculated, health economic analysis is ongoing but early data is strongly supportive of routine use in clinical practice.Copyright © 2019

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1305130808
Document Type :
Electronic Resource