Home and facility haemodialysis patients: a comparison of outcomes in a matched cohort.

BACKGROUND: Home haemodialysis (HHD) is utilised significantly less often than facility haemodialysis globally with few exceptions despite being associated with improved survival, and better quality of life. Previously, HHD was exclusively offered to younger patients with few comorbidities. However, with the increasing burden of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) alongside an ageing population, increasing numbers of older patients are being treated with HHD. This study aims to re-evaluate survival and related outcomes in the context of this epidemiological shift. METHOD(S): A matched cohort design was used to compare all-cause mortality, transplantation, average biochemical values and graft survival 6months post-transplant between HHD and facility haemodialysis patients. 181 HHD patients from a major hospital network were included, with 413 facility haemodialysis patients from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) matched by age, gender, and cause of ESKD. Survival analysis and competing risks analysis (for transplantation) were performed. RESULT(S): After adjusting for BMI, smoking status, racial group, and comorbidities, HHD was associated with significantly reduced risk of death compared to facility HD patients (HR=0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.74). Transplantation rates were comparable, with high rates of graft survival at 6months in both groups. Haemoglobin, calcium, and parathyroid hormone levels did not vary significantly. However, home HD patients had significantly lower phosphate levels. CONCLUSION(S): In this study, improved survival outcomes were observed in patients on home compared to facility dialysis, with comparable rates of transplantation, graft survival and biochemical control.Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.