Back to Search Start Over

Replication is More than Hitting the Lottery Twice

Authors :
Asendorpf, J
Conner, M
De Fruyt, F
De Houwer, J
Denissen, J
Fiedler, K
Fiedler, S
Funder, D
Kliegl, R
Nosek, B
Perugini, M
Roberts, B
Schmitt, M
Van Aken, M
Weber, H
Wicherts, J
Wicherts, J.
PERUGINI, MARCO
Asendorpf, J
Conner, M
De Fruyt, F
De Houwer, J
Denissen, J
Fiedler, K
Fiedler, S
Funder, D
Kliegl, R
Nosek, B
Perugini, M
Roberts, B
Schmitt, M
Van Aken, M
Weber, H
Wicherts, J
Wicherts, J.
PERUGINI, MARCO
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

The main goal of our target article was to provide concrete recommendations for improving the replicability of research findings. Most of the comments focus on this point. In addition, a few comments were concerned with the distinction between replicability and generalizability and the role of theory in replication. We address all comments within the conceptual structure of the target article and hope to convince readers that replication in psychological science amounts to much more than hitting the lottery twice. Copyright (C) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1308910228
Document Type :
Electronic Resource