Back to Search Start Over

Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies up to 25 April 2020 and public health implications

Authors :
Caini, S
Bellerba, F
Corso, F
Díaz-Basabe, A
Natoli, G
Paget, J
Facciotti, F
De Angelis, S
Raimondi, S
Palli, D
Mazzarella, L
Pelicci, P
Vineis, P
Gandini, S
Caini S
Bellerba F
Corso F
Díaz-Basabe A
Natoli G
Paget J
Facciotti F
De Angelis SP
Raimondi S
Palli D
Mazzarella L
Pelicci PG
Vineis P
Gandini S
Caini, S
Bellerba, F
Corso, F
Díaz-Basabe, A
Natoli, G
Paget, J
Facciotti, F
De Angelis, S
Raimondi, S
Palli, D
Mazzarella, L
Pelicci, P
Vineis, P
Gandini, S
Caini S
Bellerba F
Corso F
Díaz-Basabe A
Natoli G
Paget J
Facciotti F
De Angelis SP
Raimondi S
Palli D
Mazzarella L
Pelicci PG
Vineis P
Gandini S
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

We reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. Random-effects models yielded a summary sensitivity of 82% for IgM, and 85% for IgG and total antibodies. For specificity, the pooled estimate were 98% for IgM and 99% for IgG and total antibodies. In populations with ≤ 5% of seroconverted individuals, unless the assays have perfect (i.e. 100%) specificity, the positive predictive value would be ≤ 88%. Serological tests should be used for prevalence surveys only in hard-hit areas.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1308942008
Document Type :
Electronic Resource