Back to Search Start Over

The VAMPIRE challenge: A multi-institutional validation study of CT ventilation imaging

Authors :
Kipritidis, J
Tahir, BA
Cazoulat, G
Hofman, MS
Siva, S
Callahan, J
Hardcastle, N
Yamamoto, T
Christensen, GE
Reinhardt, JM
Kadoya, N
Patton, TJ
Gerard, SE
Duarte, I
Archibald-Heeren, B
Byrne, M
Sims, R
Ramsay, S
Booth, JT
Eslick, E
Hegi-Johnson, F
Woodruff, HC
Ireland, RH
Wild, JM
Cai, J
Bayouth, JE
Brock, K
Keall, PJ
Kipritidis, J
Tahir, BA
Cazoulat, G
Hofman, MS
Siva, S
Callahan, J
Hardcastle, N
Yamamoto, T
Christensen, GE
Reinhardt, JM
Kadoya, N
Patton, TJ
Gerard, SE
Duarte, I
Archibald-Heeren, B
Byrne, M
Sims, R
Ramsay, S
Booth, JT
Eslick, E
Hegi-Johnson, F
Woodruff, HC
Ireland, RH
Wild, JM
Cai, J
Bayouth, JE
Brock, K
Keall, PJ
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

PURPOSE: CT ventilation imaging (CTVI) is being used to achieve functional avoidance lung cancer radiation therapy in three clinical trials (NCT02528942, NCT02308709, NCT02843568). To address the need for common CTVI validation tools, we have built the Ventilation And Medical Pulmonary Image Registration Evaluation (VAMPIRE) Dataset, and present the results of the first VAMPIRE Challenge to compare relative ventilation distributions between different CTVI algorithms and other established ventilation imaging modalities. METHODS: The VAMPIRE Dataset includes 50 pairs of 4DCT scans and corresponding clinical or experimental ventilation scans, referred to as reference ventilation images (RefVIs). The dataset includes 25 humans imaged with Galligas 4DPET/CT, 21 humans imaged with DTPA-SPECT, and 4 sheep imaged with Xenon-CT. For the VAMPIRE Challenge, 16 subjects were allocated to a training group (with RefVI provided) and 34 subjects were allocated to a validation group (with RefVI blinded). Seven research groups downloaded the Challenge dataset and uploaded CTVIs based on deformable image registration (DIR) between the 4DCT inhale/exhale phases. Participants used DIR methods broadly classified into B-splines, Free-form, Diffeomorphisms, or Biomechanical modeling, with CT ventilation metrics based on the DIR evaluation of volume change, Hounsfield Unit change, or various hybrid approaches. All CTVIs were evaluated against the corresponding RefVI using the voxel-wise Spearman coefficient rS , and Dice similarity coefficients evaluated for low function lung ( DSClow ) and high function lung ( DSChigh ). RESULTS: A total of 37 unique combinations of DIR method and CT ventilation metric were either submitted by participants directly or derived from participant-submitted DIR motion fields using the in-house software, VESPIR. The rS and DSC results reveal a high degree of inter-algorithm and intersubject variability among the validation subjects, with algorithm rankings chang

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1315667575
Document Type :
Electronic Resource