Back to Search Start Over

Results of a randomized, double-blind phase II clinical trial of NY-ESO-1 vaccine with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant versus ISCOMATRIX alone in participants with high-risk resected melanoma

Authors :
Cebon, JS
Gore, M
Thompson, JF
Davis, ID
McArthur, GA
Walpole, E
Smithers, M
Cerundolo, V
Dunbar, PR
MacGregor, D
Fisher, C
Millward, M
Nathan, P
Findlay, MPN
Hersey, P
Evans, TRJ
Ottensmeier, CH
Marsden, J
Dalgleish, AG
Corrie, PG
Maria, M
Brimble, M
Williams, G
Winkler, S
Jackson, HM
Endo-Munoz, L
Tutuka, CSA
Venhaus, R
Old, LJ
Haack, D
Maraskovsky, E
Behren, A
Chen, W
Cebon, JS
Gore, M
Thompson, JF
Davis, ID
McArthur, GA
Walpole, E
Smithers, M
Cerundolo, V
Dunbar, PR
MacGregor, D
Fisher, C
Millward, M
Nathan, P
Findlay, MPN
Hersey, P
Evans, TRJ
Ottensmeier, CH
Marsden, J
Dalgleish, AG
Corrie, PG
Maria, M
Brimble, M
Williams, G
Winkler, S
Jackson, HM
Endo-Munoz, L
Tutuka, CSA
Venhaus, R
Old, LJ
Haack, D
Maraskovsky, E
Behren, A
Chen, W
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy of New York Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) vaccine with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant versus ISCOMATRIX alone in a randomized, double-blind phase II study in participants with fully resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence. METHODS: Participants with resected stage IIc, IIIb, IIIc and IV melanoma expressing NY-ESO-1 were randomized to treatment with three doses of NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX or ISCOMATRIX adjuvant administered intramuscularly at 4-week intervals, followed by a further dose at 6 months. Primary endpoint was the proportion free of relapse at 18 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and two per-protocol populations. Secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), safety and NY-ESO-1 immunity. RESULTS: The ITT population comprised 110 participants, with 56 randomized to NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX and 54 to ISCOMATRIX alone. No significant toxicities were observed. There were no differences between the study arms in relapses at 18 months or for median time to relapse; 139 vs 176 days (p=0.296), or relapse rate, 27 (48.2%) vs 26 (48.1%) (HR 0.913; 95% CI 0.402 to 2.231), respectively. RFS and OS were similar between the study arms. Vaccine recipients developed strong positive antibody responses to NY-ESO-1 (p≤0.0001) and NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ and CD8+ responses. Biopsies following relapse did not demonstrate differences in NY-ESO-1 expression between the study populations although an exploratory study demonstrated reduced (NY-ESO-1)+/Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I+ double-positive cells in biopsies from vaccine recipients performed on relapse in 19 participants. CONCLUSIONS: The vaccine was well tolerated, however, despite inducing antigen-specific immunity, it did not affect survival endpoints. Immune escape through the downregulation of NY-ESO-1 and/or HLA class I molecules on tumor may have contributed to relapse.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1315700799
Document Type :
Electronic Resource