Back to Search Start Over

Key mechanisms by which post-ICU activities can improve in-ICU care: results of the international THRIVE collaboratives.

Authors :
Haines, KJ
Sevin, CM
Hibbert, E
Boehm, LM
Aparanji, K
Bakhru, RN
Bastin, AJ
Beesley, SJ
Butcher, BW
Drumright, K
Eaton, TL
Farley, T
Firshman, P
Fritschle, A
Holdsworth, C
Hope, AA
Johnson, A
Kenes, MT
Khan, BA
Kloos, JA
Kross, EK
MacLeod-Smith, BJ
Mactavish, P
Meyer, J
Montgomery-Yates, A
Quasim, T
Saft, HL
Slack, A
Stollings, J
Weinhouse, G
Whitten, J
Netzer, G
Hopkins, RO
Mikkelsen, ME
Iwashyna, TJ
McPeake, J
Haines, KJ
Sevin, CM
Hibbert, E
Boehm, LM
Aparanji, K
Bakhru, RN
Bastin, AJ
Beesley, SJ
Butcher, BW
Drumright, K
Eaton, TL
Farley, T
Firshman, P
Fritschle, A
Holdsworth, C
Hope, AA
Johnson, A
Kenes, MT
Khan, BA
Kloos, JA
Kross, EK
MacLeod-Smith, BJ
Mactavish, P
Meyer, J
Montgomery-Yates, A
Quasim, T
Saft, HL
Slack, A
Stollings, J
Weinhouse, G
Whitten, J
Netzer, G
Hopkins, RO
Mikkelsen, ME
Iwashyna, TJ
McPeake, J
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the key mechanisms that clinicians perceive improve care in the intensive care unit (ICU), as a result of their involvement in post-ICU programs. METHODS: Qualitative inquiry via focus groups and interviews with members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine's THRIVE collaborative sites (follow-up clinics and peer support). Framework analysis was used to synthesize and interpret the data. RESULTS: Five key mechanisms were identified as drivers of improvement back into the ICU: (1) identifying otherwise unseen targets for ICU quality improvement or education programs-new ideas for quality improvement were generated and greater attention paid to detail in clinical care. (2) Creating a new role for survivors in the ICU-former patients and family members adopted an advocacy or peer volunteer role. (3) Inviting critical care providers to the post-ICU program to educate, sensitize, and motivate them-clinician peers and trainees were invited to attend as a helpful learning strategy to gain insights into post-ICU care requirements. (4) Changing clinician's own understanding of patient experience-there appeared to be a direct individual benefit from working in post-ICU programs. (5) Improving morale and meaningfulness of ICU work-this was achieved by closing the feedback loop to ICU clinicians regarding patient and family outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up of patients and families in post-ICU care settings is perceived to improve care within the ICU via five key mechanisms. Further research is required in this novel area.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1315706772
Document Type :
Electronic Resource