Back to Search Start Over

Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab as a New Standard of Care for Previously Treated BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Survival Results and Subgroup Analyses from the BEACON Study

Authors :
Tabernero, J
Grothey, A
Van Cutsem, E
Yaeger, R
Wasan, H
Yoshino, T
Desai, J
Ciardiello, F
Loupakis, F
Hong, YS
Steeghs, N
Guren, TK
Arkenau, H-T
Garcia-Alfonso, P
Elez, E
Gollerkeri, A
Maharry, K
Christy-Bittel, J
Kopetz, S
Tabernero, J
Grothey, A
Van Cutsem, E
Yaeger, R
Wasan, H
Yoshino, T
Desai, J
Ciardiello, F
Loupakis, F
Hong, YS
Steeghs, N
Guren, TK
Arkenau, H-T
Garcia-Alfonso, P
Elez, E
Gollerkeri, A
Maharry, K
Christy-Bittel, J
Kopetz, S
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

PURPOSE: BEACON CRC evaluated encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib versus investigators' choice of irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), after progression on 1-2 prior regimens. In the previously reported primary analysis, encorafenib, binimetinib plus cetuximab (ENCO/BINI/CETUX; triplet) and encorafenib plus cetuximab (ENCO/CETUX; doublet) regimens improved overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR; by blinded central review) versus standard of care. The purpose of this analysis was to report updated efficacy and safety data. METHODS: In this open-label, phase III trial, 665 patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive triplet, doublet, or control. Primary end points were OS and independently reviewed ORR comparing triplet to control. OS for doublet versus control was a key secondary end point. Updated analyses include 6 months of additional follow-up and ORR for all randomized patients. RESULTS: Patients received triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 10.8) for triplet and 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.1) for control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.75]). Median OS for doublet was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 11.3) (HR v control, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.77]). Confirmed ORR was 26.8% (95% CI, 21.1% to 33.1%) for triplet, 19.5% (95% CI, 14.5% to 25.4%) for doublet, and 1.8% (95% CI, 0.5% to 4.6%) for control. Adverse events were consistent with the prior primary analysis, with grade ≥ 3 adverse events in 65.8%, 57.4%, and 64.2% for triplet, doublet, and control, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the BEACON CRC study, encorafenib plus cetuximab improved OS, ORR, and progression-free survival in previously treated patients in the metastatic setting compared with standard chemotherapy. Based on the primary and updated analyses, encorafenib plus cetuximab is a new standard ca

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1315707034
Document Type :
Electronic Resource