Back to Search
Start Over
Prognostic Implications of Level-of-Care at Tertiary Heart Centers Compared With Other Hospitals After Resuscitation From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Source :
- Søholm , H , Kjaergaard , J , Bro-Jeppesen , J , Hartvig-Thomsen , J , Lippert , F , Køber , L , Nielsen , N , Engsig , M , Steensen , M , Wanscher , M , Karlsen , F M & Hassager , C 2015 , ' Prognostic Implications of Level-of-Care at Tertiary Heart Centers Compared With Other Hospitals After Resuscitation From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest ' , Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes , vol. 8 , no. 3 , pp. 268-76 .
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background—Studies have found higher survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and admission to tertiary heart centers. The aim was to examine the level-of-care at tertiary centers compared with nontertiary hospitals and the association with outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods and Results—Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (n=1078) without ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction admitted to tertiary centers (54%) and nontertiary hospitals (46%) were included (2002–2011). Patient charts were reviewed focusing on level-of-care and comorbidity. Survival to discharge differed significantly with 45% versus 24% of patients discharged alive (P<0.001), and after adjustment for prognostic factors admissions to tertiary centers were still associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.78 [0.64–0.96; P=0.02]), independent of comorbidity. The adjusted odds of predefined markers of level-of-care were higher in tertiary centers: admission to intensive care unit (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.2–2.5]), temporary pacemaker (OR, 6.4 [2.2–19]), vasoactive agents (OR, 1.5 [1.1–2.1]), acute (<24 hours) and late coronary angiography (OR, 10 [5.3–22] and 3.8 [2.5–5.7]), neurophysiological examination (OR, 1.8 [1.3–2.6]), and brain computed tomography (OR, 1.9 [1.4–2.6]), whereas no difference in therapeutic hypothermia was noted. Patients at tertiary centers were more often consulted by a cardiologist (OR, 8.6 [5.0–15]), had an echocardiography (OR, 2.8 [2.1–3.7]), and survivors more often had implantable cardioverter defibrillator’s implanted (OR, 2.1 [1.2–3.6]). Conclusions—Admissions to tertiary centers were associated with significantly higher survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients without ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction in the Copenhagen area even after adjustment for prognostic factors including comorbidity. Level-of-care seems higher in tertiary centers both in the early<br />BACKGROUND: Studies have found higher survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and admission to tertiary heart centers. The aim was to examine the level-of-care at tertiary centers compared with nontertiary hospitals and the association with outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (n=1078) without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction admitted to tertiary centers (54%) and nontertiary hospitals (46%) were included (2002-2011). Patient charts were reviewed focusing on level-of-care and comorbidity. Survival to discharge differed significantly with 45% versus 24% of patients discharged alive (P<0.001), and after adjustment for prognostic factors admissions to tertiary centers were still associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.78 [0.64-0.96; P=0.02]), independent of comorbidity. The adjusted odds of predefined markers of level-of-care were higher in tertiary centers: admission to intensive care unit (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.5]), temporary pacemaker (OR, 6.4 [2.2-19]), vasoactive agents (OR, 1.5 [1.1-2.1]), acute (<24 hours) and late coronary angiography (OR, 10 [5.3-22] and 3.8 [2.5-5.7]), neurophysiological examination (OR, 1.8 [1.3-2.6]), and brain computed tomography (OR, 1.9 [1.4-2.6]), whereas no difference in therapeutic hypothermia was noted. Patients at tertiary centers were more often consulted by a cardiologist (OR, 8.6 [5.0-15]), had an echocardiography (OR, 2.8 [2.1-3.7]), and survivors more often had implantable cardioverter defibrillator's implanted (OR, 2.1 [1.2-3.6]).CONCLUSIONS: Admissions to tertiary centers were associated with significantly higher survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in the Copenhagen area even after adjustment for prognostic factors including comorbidity. Level-of-care seems higher in tertiary centers
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- Søholm , H , Kjaergaard , J , Bro-Jeppesen , J , Hartvig-Thomsen , J , Lippert , F , Køber , L , Nielsen , N , Engsig , M , Steensen , M , Wanscher , M , Karlsen , F M & Hassager , C 2015 , ' Prognostic Implications of Level-of-Care at Tertiary Heart Centers Compared With Other Hospitals After Resuscitation From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest ' , Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes , vol. 8 , no. 3 , pp. 268-76 .
- Notes :
- English
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1322674966
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource