Back to Search
Start Over
Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma:Expert Perspectives
- Source :
- Verburg , F A , Amthauer , H , Binse , I , Brink , I , Buck , A , Darr , A , Dierks , C , Koch , C , Konig , U , Kreissl , MC , Luster , M , Reuter , C , Scheidhauer , K , Willenberg , HS , Zielke , A & Schott , M 2021 , ' Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma : Expert Perspectives ' , Hormone & Metabolic Research , vol. 53 , no. 03 , pp. 149-160 .
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Notwithstanding regulatory approval of lenvatinib and sorafenib to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RAI-R DTC), important questions and controversies persist regarding this use of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RAI-R DTC experts from German tertiary referral centers convened to identify and explore such issues; this paper summarizes their discussions. One challenge is determining when to start TKI therapy. Decision-making should be shared between patients and multidisciplinary caregivers, and should consider tumor size/burden, growth rate, and site(s), the key drivers of RAI-R DTC morbidity and mortality, along with current and projected tumor-related symptomatology, co-morbidities, and performance status. Another question involves choice of first-line TKIs. Currently, lenvatinib is generally preferred, due to greater increase in progression-free survival versus placebo treatment and higher response rate in its pivotal trial versus that of sorafenib; additionally, in those studies, lenvatinib but not sorafenib showed overall survival benefit in subgroup analysis. Whether recommended maximum or lower TKI starting doses better balance anti-tumor effects versus tolerability is also unresolved. Exploratory analyses of lenvatinib pivotal study data suggest dose-response effects, possibly favoring higher dosing; however, results are awaited of a prospective comparison of lenvatinib starting regimens. Some controversy surrounds determination of net therapeutic benefit, the key criterion for continuing TKI therapy: if tolerability is acceptable, overall disease control may justify further treatment despite limited but manageable progression. Future research should assess potential guideposts for starting TKIs; fine-tune dosing strategies and further characterize antitumor efficacy; and evaluate interventions to prevent and/or treat TKI toxicity, particularly palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue.
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- Verburg , F A , Amthauer , H , Binse , I , Brink , I , Buck , A , Darr , A , Dierks , C , Koch , C , Konig , U , Kreissl , MC , Luster , M , Reuter , C , Scheidhauer , K , Willenberg , HS , Zielke , A & Schott , M 2021 , ' Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma : Expert Perspectives ' , Hormone & Metabolic Research , vol. 53 , no. 03 , pp. 149-160 .
- Notes :
- application/pdf, English
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1338021860
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource