Back to Search Start Over

Experimental benchmark and code validation for airfoils equipped with passive vortex generators

Authors :
Baldacchino, D. (author)
M Manolesos, M. (author)
Ferreira, Carlos (author)
Gonzalez Salcedo, A (author)
Aparicio, M. (author)
Chaviaropoulos, T. (author)
Diakakis, K. (author)
Florentie, L. (author)
Garcia, M. (author)
Papadakis, G (author)
Sorensen, N.N. (author)
Timmer, W.A. (author)
Troldborg, N. (author)
Voutsinas, S. (author)
van Zuijlen, A.H. (author)
Baldacchino, D. (author)
M Manolesos, M. (author)
Ferreira, Carlos (author)
Gonzalez Salcedo, A (author)
Aparicio, M. (author)
Chaviaropoulos, T. (author)
Diakakis, K. (author)
Florentie, L. (author)
Garcia, M. (author)
Papadakis, G (author)
Sorensen, N.N. (author)
Timmer, W.A. (author)
Troldborg, N. (author)
Voutsinas, S. (author)
van Zuijlen, A.H. (author)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Experimental results and complimentary computations for airfoils with vortex generators are compared in this paper, as part of an e_ort within the AVATAR project to develop tools for wind turbine blade control devices. Measurements from two airfoils equipped with passive vortex generators, a 30% thick DU97W300 and an 18% thick NTUA T18 have been used for benchmarking several simulation tools. These tools span low-to-high complexity, ranging from engineering-level integral boundary layer tools to fully-resolved computational uid dynamics codes. Results indicate that with appropriate calibration, engineering-type tools can capture the e_ects of vortex generators and outperform more complex tools. Fully resolved CFD comes at a much higher computational cost and does not necessarily capture the increased lift due to the VGs. However, in lieu of the limited experimental data available for calibration, high _delity tools are still required for assessing the e_ect of vortex generators on airfoil performance.<br />Wind Energy<br />Aerodynamics<br />Education and Student Affairs

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1357853984
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1088.1742-6596.753.2.022002