Back to Search Start Over

Evidence-based decision support for pediatric rheumatology reduces diagnostic errors.

Authors :
Segal, Michael M.
Athreya, Balu
Son, Mary Beth F.
Tirosh, Irit
Hausmann, Jonathan S.
Ang, Elizabeth YN.
Zurakowski, David
Feldman, Lynn K.
Sundel, Robert P.
Segal, Michael M.
Athreya, Balu
Son, Mary Beth F.
Tirosh, Irit
Hausmann, Jonathan S.
Ang, Elizabeth YN.
Zurakowski, David
Feldman, Lynn K.
Sundel, Robert P.
Source :
Department of Pediatrics Faculty Papers
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of trained specialists world-wide is insufficient to serve all children with pediatric rheumatologic disorders, even in the countries with robust medical resources. We evaluated the potential of diagnostic decision support software (DDSS) to alleviate this shortage by assessing the ability of such software to improve the diagnostic accuracy of non-specialists. METHODS: Using vignettes of actual clinical cases, clinician testers generated a differential diagnosis before and after using diagnostic decision support software. The evaluation used the SimulConsult® DDSS tool, based on Bayesian pattern matching with temporal onset of each finding in each disease. The tool covered 5405 diseases (averaging 22 findings per disease). Rheumatology content in the database was developed using both primary references and textbooks. The frequency, timing, age of onset and age of disappearance of findings, as well as their incidence, treatability, and heritability were taken into account in order to guide diagnostic decision making. These capabilities allowed key information such as pertinent negatives and evolution over time to be used in the computations. Efficacy was measured by comparing whether the correct condition was included in the differential diagnosis generated by clinicians before using the software ("unaided"), versus after use of the DDSS ("aided"). RESULTS: The 26 clinicians demonstrated a significant reduction in diagnostic errors following introduction of the software, from 28% errors while unaided to 15% using decision support (p < 0.0001). Improvement was greatest for emergency medicine physicians (p = 0.013) and clinicians in practice for less than 10 years (p = 0.012). This error reduction occurred despite the fact that testers employed an "open book" approach to generate their initial lists of potential diagnoses, spending an average of 8.6 min using printed and electronic sources of medical information before using the diagnostic softwa

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Department of Pediatrics Faculty Papers
Notes :
application/pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1362922294
Document Type :
Electronic Resource