Back to Search Start Over

GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

Authors :
Santesso, Nancy
Glenton, Claire
Dahm, Philipp
Garner, Paul
Akl, Elie A.
Alper, Brian
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
De Beer, Hans
Hultcrantz, Monica
Kuijpers, Ton
Meerpohl, Joerg
Morgan, Rebecca
Mustafa, Reem
Skoetz, Nicole
Sultan, Shahnaz
Wiysonge, Charles
Guyatt, Gordon
Schunemann, Holger J.
Santesso, Nancy
Glenton, Claire
Dahm, Philipp
Garner, Paul
Akl, Elie A.
Alper, Brian
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
De Beer, Hans
Hultcrantz, Monica
Kuijpers, Ton
Meerpohl, Joerg
Morgan, Rebecca
Mustafa, Reem
Skoetz, Nicole
Sultan, Shahnaz
Wiysonge, Charles
Guyatt, Gordon
Schunemann, Holger J.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives: Clear communication of systematic review findings will help readers and decision makers. We built on previous work to develop an approach that improves the clarity of statements to convey findings and that draws on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Study Design and Setting: We conducted workshops including 80 attendants and a survey of 110 producers and users of systematic reviews. We calculated acceptability of statements and revised the wording of those that were unacceptable to >= 40% of participants. Results: Most participants agreed statements should be based on size of effect and certainty of evidence. Statements for low, moderate and high certainty evidence were acceptable to >60%. Key guidance, for example, includes statements for high, moderate and low certainty for a large effect on intervention x as: x results in a large reduction...; x likely results in a large reduction...; x may result in a large reduction..., respectively. Conclusions: Producers and users of systematic reviews found statements to communicate findings combining size and certainty of an effect acceptable. This article provides GRADE guidance and a wording template to formulate statements in systematic reviews and other decision tools. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1364933442
Document Type :
Electronic Resource