Back to Search Start Over

Impact of a pharmacy benefit change on new use of mail order pharmacy among diabetes patients: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors :
Karter, Andrew J
Karter, Andrew J
Parker, Melissa M
Duru, O Kenrik
Schillinger, Dean
Adler, Nancy E
Moffet, Howard H
Adams, Alyce S
Chan, James
Herman, Willam H
Schmittdiel, Julie A
Karter, Andrew J
Karter, Andrew J
Parker, Melissa M
Duru, O Kenrik
Schillinger, Dean
Adler, Nancy E
Moffet, Howard H
Adams, Alyce S
Chan, James
Herman, Willam H
Schmittdiel, Julie A
Source :
Health services research; vol 50, iss 2, 537-559; 0017-9124
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of a pharmacy benefit change on mail order pharmacy (MOP) uptake.Data sources/study settingRace-stratified, random sample of diabetes patients in an integrated health care delivery system.Study designIn this natural experiment, we studied the impact of a pharmacy benefit change that conditionally discounted medications if patients used MOP and prepaid two copayments. We compared MOP uptake among those exposed to the benefit change (n = 2,442) and the reference group with no benefit change (n = 8,148), and estimated differential MOP uptake across social strata using a difference-in-differences framework.Data collection/extraction methodsAscertained MOP uptake (initiation among previous nonusers).Principal findingsThirty percent of patients started using MOP after receiving the benefit change versus 9 percent uptake among the reference group (p < .0001). After adjustment, there was a 26 percentage point greater MOP uptake (benefit change effect). This benefit change effect was significantly smaller among patients with inadequate health literacy (15 percent less), limited English proficiency (14 percent less), and among Latinos and Asians (24 and 16 percent less compared to Caucasians).ConclusionsConditionally discounting medications delivered by MOP effectively stimulated MOP uptake overall, but it unintentionally widened previously existing social gaps in MOP use because it stimulated less MOP uptake in vulnerable populations.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Health services research; vol 50, iss 2, 537-559; 0017-9124
Notes :
application/pdf, Health services research vol 50, iss 2, 537-559 0017-9124
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1377977461
Document Type :
Electronic Resource