Back to Search Start Over

Automatic assessment of laparoscopic surgical skill competence based on motion metrics

Authors :
Ebina, Koki
Abe, Takashige
Hotta, Kiyohiko
Higuchi, Madoka
Furumido, Jun
Iwahara, Naoya
Kon, Masafumi
Miyaji, Kou
Shibuya, Sayaka
Lingbo, Yan
Komizunai, Shunsuke
Kurashima, Yo
Kikuchi, Hiroshi
Matsumoto, Ryuji
Osawa, Takahiro
Murai, Sachiyo
Tsujita, Teppei
Sase, Kazuya
Chen, Xiaoshuai
Konno, Atsushi
1000090250422
Shinohara, Nobuo
Ebina, Koki
Abe, Takashige
Hotta, Kiyohiko
Higuchi, Madoka
Furumido, Jun
Iwahara, Naoya
Kon, Masafumi
Miyaji, Kou
Shibuya, Sayaka
Lingbo, Yan
Komizunai, Shunsuke
Kurashima, Yo
Kikuchi, Hiroshi
Matsumoto, Ryuji
Osawa, Takahiro
Murai, Sachiyo
Tsujita, Teppei
Sase, Kazuya
Chen, Xiaoshuai
Konno, Atsushi
1000090250422
Shinohara, Nobuo
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize the motion features of surgical devices associated with laparoscopic surgical competency and build an automatic skill-credential system in porcine cadaver organ simulation training. Participants performed tissue dissection around the aorta, dividing vascular pedicles after applying Hem-o-lok (tissue dissection task) and parenchymal closure of the kidney (suturing task). Movements of surgical devices were tracked by a motion capture (Mocap) system, and Mocap-metrics were compared according to the level of surgical experience (experts: >= 50 laparoscopic surgeries, intermediates: 10-49, novices: 0-9), using the Kruskal-Wallis test and principal component analysis (PCA). Three machine-learning algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), PCA-SVM, and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), were utilized for discrimination of the surgical experience level. The accuracy of each model was evaluated by nested and repeated k-fold cross-validation. A total of 32 experts, 18 intermediates, and 20 novices participated in the present study. PCA revealed that efficiency-related metrics (e.g., path length) significantly contributed to PC 1 in both tasks. Regarding PC 2, speed-related metrics (e.g., velocity, acceleration, jerk) of right-hand devices largely contributed to the tissue dissection task, while those of left-hand devices did in the suturing task. Regarding the three-group discrimination, in the tissue dissection task, the GBDT method was superior to the other methods (median accuracy: 68.6%). In the suturing task, SVM and PCA-SVM methods were superior to the GBDT method (57.4 and 58.4%, respectively). Regarding the two-group discrimination (experts vs. intermediates/novices), the GBDT method resulted in a median accuracy of 72.9% in the tissue dissection task, and, in the suturing task, the PCA-SVM method resulted in a median accuracy of 69.2%. Overall, the mocap-based credential system using machine-learning classifiers pr

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1378467821
Document Type :
Electronic Resource