Prevalence and Associated Factors of Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Xiufen Wang,1– 3 Ying Wang,1,2 Li Luo,3 Liuting Tan,4 Wenzhi Cai,1 Ling Chen,1 Wei Ren1 1Department of Nursing, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of the Third Pulmonary Disease, The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Endocrine, The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Wei Ren; Ling Chen, Department of Nursing, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1333 Xinhu Road, Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, 518101, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-755-23360006, Fax +86-755-23323777, Email renwei196911@163.com; dangdang601@smu.edu.cnIntroduction: Diabetic neurogenic bladder is one of the common complications in patients with diabetic neuropathy. However, studies reporting the prevalence and associated factors of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients with diabetic neuropathy are rare. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the prevalence and influencing factors of UTI in patients with diabetic neuropathy.Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study that recruited patients with diabetic neuropathy was conducted from January 2019 to December 2021. Collected data included patient demographic information (age, sex, education level, body mass index), clinical data (duration of diabetes, method of administration), and laboratory tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the factors associated with UTI risk. The strength of association was expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).Results: A total of 579 patients were recruited (male, 68.2%; overall average age, 57.89 years). Using multivariate analysis with adjustment for confounding factors, female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.12