Back to Search Start Over

Two-Period Study Results from a Large Italian Hospital Laboratory Attesting SARS-CoV-2 Variant PCR Assay Evolution

Authors :
Liotti, Flora Marzia
De Maio, Flavio
Ippoliti, Chiara
Santarelli, Giulia
Monzo, F. R.
Sali, Michela
Santangelo, Rosaria
Ceccherini-Silberstein, F.
Sanguinetti, Maurizio
Posteraro, Brunella
Liotti F. M.
De Maio F.
Ippoliti C.
Santarelli G.
Sali M. (ORCID:0000-0003-3609-2990)
Santangelo R. (ORCID:0000-0002-8056-218X)
Sanguinetti M. (ORCID:0000-0002-9780-7059)
Posteraro B. (ORCID:0000-0002-1663-7546)
Liotti, Flora Marzia
De Maio, Flavio
Ippoliti, Chiara
Santarelli, Giulia
Monzo, F. R.
Sali, Michela
Santangelo, Rosaria
Ceccherini-Silberstein, F.
Sanguinetti, Maurizio
Posteraro, Brunella
Liotti F. M.
De Maio F.
Ippoliti C.
Santarelli G.
Sali M. (ORCID:0000-0003-3609-2990)
Santangelo R. (ORCID:0000-0002-8056-218X)
Sanguinetti M. (ORCID:0000-0002-9780-7059)
Posteraro B. (ORCID:0000-0002-1663-7546)
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

In keeping with the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the COVID-19 causative agent, PCR assays have been developed to rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 variants, which have emerged since the first (Alpha) variant was identified. Based on specific assortment of SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein mutations (DH69/V70, E484K, N501Y, W152C, L452R, K417N, and K417T) among the major variants known to date, Seegene Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Variants I and Variants II assays have been available since a few months before the last (Omicron) variant became predominant. Using S gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) as the SARS-CoV-2 variant identification reference method, we assessed the results of SARS-CoV-2-positive nasopharyngeal swab samples from two testing periods, before (n = 288, using only Variants I) and after (n = 77, using both Variants I and Variants II) the appearance of Omicron. The Variants I assay allowed correct identification for Alpha (37/37), Beta/Gamma (28/ 30), or Delta (220/221) variant-positive samples. The combination of the Variants I and Variants II assays allowed correct identification for 61/77 Omicron variant-positive samples. While 16 samples had the K417N mutation undetected with the Variants II assay, 74/77 samples had both DH69/V70 and N501Y mutations detected with the Variants I assay. If considering only the results by the Variants I assay, 6 (2 Beta variant positive, 1 Delta variant positive, and 3 Omicron variant positive) of 365 samples tested in total provided incorrect identification. We showed that the Variants I assay alone might be more suitable than both the Variants I and Variants II assays to identify currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. Inclusion of additional variant-specific mutations should be expected in the development of future assays.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1382659537
Document Type :
Electronic Resource