Back to Search Start Over

Screening and diagnostic breast MRI:how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study

Authors :
Cozzi, Andrea
Di Leo, Giovanni
Houssami, Nehmat
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Helbich, Thomas H.
Álvarez Benito, Marina
Balleyguier, Corinne
Bazzocchi, Massimo
Bult, Peter
Calabrese, Massimo
Camps Herrero, Julia
Cartia, Francesco
Cassano, Enrico
Clauser, Paola
de Lima Docema, Marcos F.
Depretto, Catherine
Dominelli, Valeria
Forrai, Gábor
Girometti, Rossano
Harms, Steven E.
Hilborne, Sarah
Ienzi, Raffaele
Lobbes, Marc B.I.
Losio, Claudio
Mann, Ritse M.
Montemezzi, Stefania
Obdeijn, Inge Marie
Ozcan, Umit A.
Pediconi, Federica
Pinker, Katja
Preibsch, Heike
Raya Povedano, José L.
Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina
Sacchetto, Daniela
Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P.
Schlooz, Margrethe
Szabó, Botond K.
Taylor, Donna B.
Ulus, Özden S.
Van Goethem, Mireille
Veltman, Jeroen
Weigel, Stefanie
Wenkel, Evelyn
Zuiani, Chiara
Sardanelli, Francesco
Cozzi, Andrea
Di Leo, Giovanni
Houssami, Nehmat
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Helbich, Thomas H.
Álvarez Benito, Marina
Balleyguier, Corinne
Bazzocchi, Massimo
Bult, Peter
Calabrese, Massimo
Camps Herrero, Julia
Cartia, Francesco
Cassano, Enrico
Clauser, Paola
de Lima Docema, Marcos F.
Depretto, Catherine
Dominelli, Valeria
Forrai, Gábor
Girometti, Rossano
Harms, Steven E.
Hilborne, Sarah
Ienzi, Raffaele
Lobbes, Marc B.I.
Losio, Claudio
Mann, Ritse M.
Montemezzi, Stefania
Obdeijn, Inge Marie
Ozcan, Umit A.
Pediconi, Federica
Pinker, Katja
Preibsch, Heike
Raya Povedano, José L.
Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina
Sacchetto, Daniela
Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P.
Schlooz, Margrethe
Szabó, Botond K.
Taylor, Donna B.
Ulus, Özden S.
Van Goethem, Mireille
Veltman, Jeroen
Weigel, Stefanie
Wenkel, Evelyn
Zuiani, Chiara
Sardanelli, Francesco
Source :
Cozzi , A , Di Leo , G , Houssami , N , Gilbert , F J , Helbich , T H , Álvarez Benito , M , Balleyguier , C , Bazzocchi , M , Bult , P , Calabrese , M , Camps Herrero , J , Cartia , F , Cassano , E , Clauser , P , de Lima Docema , M F , Depretto , C , Dominelli , V , Forrai , G , Girometti , R , Harms , S E , Hilborne , S , Ienzi , R , Lobbes , M B I , Losio , C , Mann , R M , Montemezzi , S , Obdeijn , I M , Ozcan , U A , Pediconi , F , Pinker , K , Preibsch , H , Raya Povedano , J L , Rossi Saccarelli , C , Sacchetto , D , Scaperrotta , G P , Schlooz , M , Szabó , B K , Taylor , D B , Ulus , Ö S , Van Goethem , M , Veltman , J , Weigel , S , Wenkel , E , Zuiani , C & Sardanelli , F 2023 , ' Screening and diagnostic breast MRI : how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study ' , European Radiology , vol. 33 , no. 9 , pp. 6213-6225 .
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objectives: To report mastectomy and reoperation rates in women who had breast MRI for screening (S-MRI subgroup) or diagnostic (D-MRI subgroup) purposes, using multivariable analysis for investigating the role of MRI referral/nonreferral and other covariates in driving surgical outcomes. Methods: The MIPA observational study enrolled women aged 18–80 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer destined to have surgery as the primary treatment, in 27 centres worldwide. Mastectomy and reoperation rates were compared using non-parametric tests and multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 5828 patients entered analysis, 2763 (47.4%) did not undergo MRI (noMRI subgroup) and 3065 underwent MRI (52.6%); of the latter, 2441/3065 (79.7%) underwent MRI with preoperative intent (P-MRI subgroup), 510/3065 (16.6%) D-MRI, and 114/3065 S-MRI (3.7%). The reoperation rate was 10.5% for S-MRI, 8.2% for D-MRI, and 8.5% for P-MRI, while it was 11.7% for noMRI (p ≤ 0.023 for comparisons with D-MRI and P-MRI). The overall mastectomy rate (first-line mastectomy plus conversions from conserving surgery to mastectomy) was 39.5% for S-MRI, 36.2% for P-MRI, 24.1% for D-MRI, and 18.0% for noMRI. At multivariable analysis, using noMRI as reference, the odds ratios for overall mastectomy were 2.4 (p < 0.001) for S-MRI, 1.0 (p = 0.957) for D-MRI, and 1.9 (p < 0.001) for P-MRI. Conclusions: Patients from the D-MRI subgroup had the lowest overall mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together with P-MRI (8.5%). This analysis offers an insight into how the initial indication for MRI affects the subsequent surgical treatment of breast cancer. Key Points: • Of 3065 breast MRI examinations, 79.7% were performed with preoperative intent (P-MRI), 16.6% were diagnostic (D-MRI), and 3.7% were screening (S-MRI) examinations. • The D-MRI subgroup had the lowest mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together wi

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Cozzi , A , Di Leo , G , Houssami , N , Gilbert , F J , Helbich , T H , Álvarez Benito , M , Balleyguier , C , Bazzocchi , M , Bult , P , Calabrese , M , Camps Herrero , J , Cartia , F , Cassano , E , Clauser , P , de Lima Docema , M F , Depretto , C , Dominelli , V , Forrai , G , Girometti , R , Harms , S E , Hilborne , S , Ienzi , R , Lobbes , M B I , Losio , C , Mann , R M , Montemezzi , S , Obdeijn , I M , Ozcan , U A , Pediconi , F , Pinker , K , Preibsch , H , Raya Povedano , J L , Rossi Saccarelli , C , Sacchetto , D , Scaperrotta , G P , Schlooz , M , Szabó , B K , Taylor , D B , Ulus , Ö S , Van Goethem , M , Veltman , J , Weigel , S , Wenkel , E , Zuiani , C & Sardanelli , F 2023 , ' Screening and diagnostic breast MRI : how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study ' , European Radiology , vol. 33 , no. 9 , pp. 6213-6225 .
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1383761277
Document Type :
Electronic Resource