Robustness of optimal sensor methods in dynamic testing–comparison and implementation on a footbridge

One of the objectives of structural health monitoring (SHM) is to maximize the information while keeping the number of sensors, and consequently the cost of the sensor system, to a minimum. Besides, the sensor configurations must be robust in the sense that the feasibility of small errors inherent to the process must not lead to large variations in the final results. This paper presents novelties regarding the robustness evaluation to model and measurement errors of four of the most influential optimal sensor placement (OSP) methods: the modal kinetic energy (MKE) method; the effective independence (EFI) method; the information entropy index (IEI) method; and the MinMAC method. The four OSP methods were implemented on the Streicker Bridge, a footbridge located on the Princeton University Campus, to identify five mode shapes of the bridge. The mode shapes, obtained in a FE model’s modal analysis, were used as input data for the OSP analyses. The study indicates that the MKE method seems to be the most suitable method to estimate the optimal sensor positions: it provides a relatively large amount of information with the lowest computational time, and it outperforms the other three methods in terms of robustness in the usual range of number of sensors.
Peer Reviewed
Postprint (published version)