Back to Search Start Over

APAP Treatment Acceptance Rate and Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors :
Pei,Guo
Ou,Qiong
Lao,Miaochan
Wang,Longlong
Xu,Yanxia
Tan,Jiaoying
Zheng,Gaihong
Pei,Guo
Ou,Qiong
Lao,Miaochan
Wang,Longlong
Xu,Yanxia
Tan,Jiaoying
Zheng,Gaihong
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Guo Pei,1,2,* Qiong Ou,1,2,* Miaochan Lao,1 Longlong Wang,1 Yanxia Xu,1 Jiaoying Tan,1 Gaihong Zheng1 1Department of Sleep Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qiong Ou, Department of Sleep Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13609717251, Email ouqiong2776@hotmail.comPurpose: This study evaluated the treatment acceptance rate and cost-effectiveness of the telemedicine model in clinical practice for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Patients and Methods: Patients admitted to the sleep center for snoring were randomly divided into telemedicine and control groups. Patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OSA using the Home Sleep Apnea Test (HSAT) were voluntarily treated with auto-adjusted positive airway pressure (APAP) therapy. The acceptance rate of the APAP treatment, cost of patient visits, time cost, and labor cost of doctors in the two groups were observed.Results: A total of 57 subjects were included, with an average age of 40.12± 11.73 years, including 47 males (82.5%); 26 patients were in the telemedicine group, and 31 were in the control group. Follow-up results showed that the acceptance rate of APAP treatment was 57.7% and 54.8% in the telemedicine and control groups, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.829). The cost-benefit analysis showed that the telemedicine group reduced the cost of patients’ medical treatment [− 457.84(− 551.19,1466.87)] but increased the extra intervention frequency and time outside the doctor’s office. Further an

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
text/html, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1393902460
Document Type :
Electronic Resource