Back to Search Start Over

Theoretical Schemas to Guide Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Chronic Low Back Pain Clinical Research.

Authors :
Chau, Anthony
Chau, Anthony
Steib, Sharis
Whitaker, Evans
Kohns, David
Quinter, Alexander
Craig, Anita
Chiodo, Anthony
Chandran, SriKrishan
Laidlaw, Ann
Schott, Zachary
Farlow, Nathan
Yarjanian, John
Omwanghe, Ashley
Wasserman, Ronald
ONeill, Conor
Clauw, Dan
Bowden, Anton
Marras, William
Carey, Tim
Mehling, Wolf
Hunt, C
Lotz, Jeffrey
Chau, Anthony
Chau, Anthony
Steib, Sharis
Whitaker, Evans
Kohns, David
Quinter, Alexander
Craig, Anita
Chiodo, Anthony
Chandran, SriKrishan
Laidlaw, Ann
Schott, Zachary
Farlow, Nathan
Yarjanian, John
Omwanghe, Ashley
Wasserman, Ronald
ONeill, Conor
Clauw, Dan
Bowden, Anton
Marras, William
Carey, Tim
Mehling, Wolf
Hunt, C
Lotz, Jeffrey
Source :
Pain Medicine; vol 24, iss Suppl 1
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a complex with a heterogenous clinical presentation. A better understanding of the factors that contribute to cLBP is needed for accurate diagnosis, optimal treatment, and identification of mechanistic targets for new therapies. The Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program provides a unique opportunity in this regard, as it will generate large clinical datasets, including a diverse set of harmonized measurements. The Theoretical Model Working Group was established to guide BACPAC research and to organize new knowledge within a mechanistic framework. This article summarizes the initial work of the Theoretical Model Working Group. It includes a three-stage integration of expert opinion and an umbrella literature review of factors that affect cLBP severity and chronicity. METHODS: During Stage 1, experts from across BACPAC established a taxonomy for risk and prognostic factors (RPFs) and preliminary graphical depictions. During Stage 2, a separate team conducted a literature review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to establish working definitions, associated data elements, and overall strength of evidence for identified RPFs. These were subsequently integrated with expert opinion during Stage 3. RESULTS: The majority (∼80%) of RPFs had little strength-of-evidence confidence, whereas seven factors had substantial confidence for either a positive association with cLBP (pain-related anxiety, serum C-reactive protein, diabetes, and anticipatory/compensatory postural adjustments) or no association with cLBP (serum interleukin 1-beta / interleukin 6, transversus muscle morphology/activity, and quantitative sensory testing). CONCLUSION: This theoretical perspective will evolve over time as BACPAC investigators link empirical results to theory, challenge current ideas of the biopsychosocial model, and use a systems approach to develop tools and algorith

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Pain Medicine; vol 24, iss Suppl 1
Notes :
application/pdf, Pain Medicine vol 24, iss Suppl 1
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1401036213
Document Type :
Electronic Resource