Back to Search Start Over

A systematic approach to illuminate a new hot spot of avian influenza virus circulation in South Vietnam, 2016-2017

Authors :
Kien Trung Le
Stevenson, Mark A.
1000080615732
Isoda, Norikazu
Lam Thanh Nguyen
Duc-Huy Chu
Tien Ngoc Nguyen
Long Van Nguyen
Tien Ngoc Tien
Tung Thanh Le
1000040753306
Matsuno, Keita
1000000507163
Okamatsu, Masatoshi
1000040333637
Sakoda, Yoshihiro
Kien Trung Le
Stevenson, Mark A.
1000080615732
Isoda, Norikazu
Lam Thanh Nguyen
Duc-Huy Chu
Tien Ngoc Nguyen
Long Van Nguyen
Tien Ngoc Tien
Tung Thanh Le
1000040753306
Matsuno, Keita
1000000507163
Okamatsu, Masatoshi
1000040333637
Sakoda, Yoshihiro
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

In South Vietnam, live bird markets (LBMs) are key in the value chain of poultry products and spread of avian influenza virus (AIV) although they may not be the sole determinant of AIV prevalence. For this reason, a risk analysis of AIV prevalence was conducted accounting for all value chain factors. A cross-sectional study of poultry flock managers and poultry on backyard farms, commercial (high biosecurity) farms, LBMs and poultry delivery stations (PDSs) in four districts of Vinh Long province was conducted between December 2016 and August 2017. A total of 3597 swab samples were collected from birds from 101 backyard farms, 50 commercial farms, 58 sellers in LBMs and 19 traders in PDSs. Swab samples were submitted for AIV isolation. At the same time a questionnaire was administered to flock managers asking them to provide details of their knowledge, attitude and practices related to avian influenza. Multiple correspondence analysis and a mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression model were developed to identify enterprise and flock manager characteristics that increased the risk of AIV positivity. A total of 274 birds were positive for AIV isolation, returning an estimated true prevalence of 7.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.8%-8.5%]. The odds of a bird being AIV positive if it was from an LBM or PDS were 45 (95% CI: 3.4-590) and 25 (95% CI: 1.4-460), respectively, times higher to the odds of a bird from a commercial poultry farm being AIV positive. The odds of birds being AIV positive for respondents with a mixed (uncertain or inconsistent) level and a low level of knowledge about AI were 5.0 (95% CI: 0.20-130) and 3.5 (95% CI: 0.2-62), respectively, times higher to the odd of birds being positive for respondents with a good knowledge of AI. LBMs and PDSs should receive specific emphasis in AI control programs in Vietnam. Our findings provide evidence to support the hypothesis that incomplete respondent knowledge of AI and AIV spread mechanism were ass

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document, application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1409767506
Document Type :
Electronic Resource