Back to Search Start Over

Applicability of in vivo staging of regional amyloid burden in a cognitively normal cohort with subjective memory complaints: the INSIGHT-preAD study.

Authors :
Sakr, Fatemah
Sakr, Fatemah
Grothe, Michel
Cavedo, Enrica
Jelistratova, Irina
Habert, Marie-Odile
Dyrba, Martin
Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel
Bertin, Hugo
Locatelli, Maxime
Lehericy, Stephane
Teipel, Stefan
Dubois, Bruno
Hampel, Harald
Sakr, Fatemah
Sakr, Fatemah
Grothe, Michel
Cavedo, Enrica
Jelistratova, Irina
Habert, Marie-Odile
Dyrba, Martin
Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel
Bertin, Hugo
Locatelli, Maxime
Lehericy, Stephane
Teipel, Stefan
Dubois, Bruno
Hampel, Harald
Source :
Alzheimers Research and Therapy; vol 11, iss 1
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current methods of amyloid PET interpretation based on the binary classification of global amyloid signal fail to identify early phases of amyloid deposition. A recent analysis of 18F-florbetapir PET data from the Alzheimers disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort suggested a hierarchical four-stage model of regional amyloid deposition that resembles neuropathologic estimates and can be used to stage an individuals amyloid burden in vivo. Here, we evaluated the validity of this in vivo amyloid staging model in an independent cohort of older people with subjective memory complaints (SMC). We further examined its potential association with subtle cognitive impairments in this population at elevated risk for Alzheimers disease (AD). METHODS: The monocentric INSIGHT-preAD cohort includes 318 cognitively intact older individuals with SMC. All individuals underwent 18F-florbetapir PET scanning and extensive neuropsychological testing. We projected the regional amyloid uptake signal into the previously proposed hierarchical staging model of in vivo amyloid progression. We determined the adherence to this model across all cases and tested the association between increasing in vivo amyloid stage and cognitive performance using ANCOVA models. RESULTS: In total, 156 participants (49%) showed evidence of regional amyloid deposition, and all but 2 of these (99%) adhered to the hierarchical regional pattern implied by the in vivo amyloid progression model. According to a conventional binary classification based on global signal (SUVRCereb = 1.10), individuals in stages III and IV were classified as amyloid-positive (except one in stage III), but 99% of individuals in stage I and even 28% of individuals in stage II were classified as amyloid-negative. Neither in vivo amyloid stage nor conventional binary amyloid status was significantly associated with cognitive performance in this preclinical cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed hierarchical staging scheme of PET-evi

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Alzheimers Research and Therapy; vol 11, iss 1
Notes :
application/pdf, Alzheimers Research and Therapy vol 11, iss 1
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1410329717
Document Type :
Electronic Resource