Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the efficiency of cleaning and disinfection protocols for hand endodontic instruments

Authors :
Jovanović-Medojević, Milica
Jovanović-Medojević, Milica
Opačić-Galić, Vanja
Geler, Katarina
Pavlica, Dušan
Jovanović-Medojević, Milica
Jovanović-Medojević, Milica
Opačić-Galić, Vanja
Geler, Katarina
Pavlica, Dušan
Source :
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background/Aim. There is no standard protocol for cleaning and disinfection of used endodontic instruments before their sterilization and reuse. The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of the different methods of removing biological debris from different types of used hand stainless steel endodontic instruments. Methods. A total of 120 hand stainless steel endodontic instruments: KerrTM reamers, KerrTM files, and HedströmTM files, each forty ISO 25, used for root canal treatment on extracted teeth, were analyzed. The used instruments were divided into four groups based on different decontamination protocols. The evaluation of the efficiency of the cleaning methods was based on the evaluation of the amount of stained organic residues on the instruments (Van Gieson staining). Samples were analyzed by stereomicroscopy (x40). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for the KerrTM reamers and HedströmTM files, while the One-Way ANOVA/Bonferroni test was used for the KerrTM files, at a significance level of 5% (a = 0.05). Results. Residual biological debris was observed on 93.3% of all the samples taken. The thermal disinfectant cleaning method showed the lowest contamination values for all types of instruments. The method of mechanical cleaning showed that the mean value of maximum biologic contamination (MBC) was 58.5% for the KerrTM reamers and 56.2% for KerrTM files, while for HedströmTM files, the highest MBC (50.2%) was shown by the ultrasonic method of cleaning. Conclusion. The use of a thermal disinfectant was the most efficient cleaning method for all three types of hand endodontic instruments.<br />Uvod/Cilj. Ne postoji standard za čišćenje i dezinfekciju upotrebljenih endodontskih instrumenata pre njihove sterilizacije i ponovnog korišćenja. Cilj rada bio je da se ustanovi efikasnost različitih metoda uklanjanja ostataka biološkog materijala sa radnih površina upotrebljenih ručnih endodontskih instrumenata od nerđajućeg čelika. Metode. Analizirano je ukupno 120 ručnih endodontskih instrumenata od nerđajućeg čelika: po četrdeset KerrTM proširivača, KerrTM turpija i HedströmTM turpija ISO 25, upotrebljenih za obradu kanala korena na ekstrahovanim zubima. Na osnovu protokola koji je korišćen za dekontaminaciju instrumenata, upotrebljeni instrumenti su podeljeni u četiri grupe. Procena efikasnosti korišćenih metoda čišćenja zasnovana je na proceni količine prebojenih organskih ostataka na instrumentima (bojenje po Van Gieson-u). Uzorci su analizirani stereomikroskopijom (x40). Statistička analiza dobijenih rezultata izvršena je MannWhitney U testom za KerrTM proširivače i HedströmTM turpije dok je za KerrTM turpije korišćen One-Way ANOVA/Bonferoni test, na nivou pouzdanosti od 5% (a = 0,05). Rezultati. Prisustvo rezidualnih ostataka biološkog materijala uočeno je na 93,3% svih analiziranih instrumenata. Metoda čišćenja toplotnim dezinfikatorom pokazala je najniže vrednosti kontaminacije za sve tipove instrumenata. Metoda mehaničkog čišćenja pokazala je da je srednja vrednost parametra maksimum biološke kontaminacije (MBK) bila 58,5% za KerrTM proširivače i 56,2% za KerrTM turpije, dok je za HedströmTM turpije najviša vrednost MBK (50,2%) bila posle ultrazvučne metode čišćenja instrumenata. Zaključak. Primena toplotnog dezinfikatora je najefikasnija metoda čišćenja za sva tri tipa ručnih endodontskih instrumenata.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Notes :
Vojnosanitetski pregled, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1414460369
Document Type :
Electronic Resource