On the chest size of Kebara 2

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CGL2012-37279, MINECO), the Leakey Foundation, and PI10/02089 ( Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria) Ministry of Health, Spain.
Chest size is important for reconstructing Neandertal paleobiology. The large size of the Neandertal skeletal thorax has been interpreted about cold adaptation, increased body mass, specific body shape, and increased activity levels (Franciscus and Churchill, 2002, Churchill, 2006, Gómez-Olivencia et al., 2009). Large Neandertal chests should also be expected because chest and lung sizes are correlated developmentally (Thurlbeck, 1982, Bastir et al., 2013a), because lung size scales isometrically with body mass across mammals (Stahl, 1967), and because body mass was larger in Neandertals than in modern humans (Ruff et al., 1997, Froehle and Churchill, 2009). The notion of large chests has recently been reinforced by Gómez-Olivencia et al. (2009), who measured the ribs of the Kebara 2 Neandertal male using arc lengths. Their study suggested that the upper ribs of Kebara 2 are within the range of modern humans, and the middle (ribs 4, 5, 7) and lower (ribs 8, 10) thoracic ribs exceed the range of modern human variation. Consequently, this predicts that the total thorax size (the sum of the sizes of each of the ribs) should be larger in Kebara than in modern humans. However, Gómez-Olivencia et al. (2009) also identified a problem in the original reconstruction of the 6th and 7th ribs of Kebara due to a misidentification of fragments fitted together by Arensburg (1991), who stated that the ribs of “Kebara man are quite similar in metric and morphological respects to those of ribs in present human populations” (Arensburg, 1991: 142). Nevertheless, misidentifications such as those identified by Gómez Olivencia et al. (2009) could affect size assessments. Bastir et al. (2012) measured the reconstruction of the Kebara rib cage (Sawyer and Maley, 2005) using 3D geometric morphometrics, and no evidence for such enlarged chest size was found, supporting Arensburg's (1991) opinion. Thus, the size of one of the best-preserved Neandertal male thoracic skeletons is currently uncle
Depto. de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución
Fac. de Ciencias Biológicas
TRUE
pub