An anthropocosmic view: what Confucian traditions can teach us about the past and future of Chinese higher education

Referencias bibliográficas: • Altbach, P. G. (2009). One-third of the globe: the future of higher education in China and India. Prospects, 39(1), 11. 10.1007/s11125-009-9106-1. • Altbach, P. G. (2016). Chinese higher education: “glass ceiling” and “feet of clay”. International Higher Education, (86), 11–13. 10.6017/ihe.2016.86.9364. • Barnett, R. (2003). Universities in a fluid age. In A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 561–568). 10.1002/9780470996454.ch41. • Bienefeld, S., & Almqvist, J. (2004). Student life and the roles of students in Europe. European Journal of Education, 39(4), 429–441. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2004.00195.x. • Brubacher, J. S. (1982). On the philosophy of higher education. Revised edition. The Jossey-Bass Series in Higher Education: ERIC. • Bruno-Jofré, R., & Jover, G. (2008). Los estudios de formación docente y pedagógica en Canadá y España: cambios programáticos e institucionales en el escenario de internacionalización de la educación. Revista de Educación, 347, 397–417. • Deng, W. (2016). Chinese higher education model in change: negotiation with Western power. 31, 121–132. 10.1007/978-981-10-0330-1_9. • Deng, Q., Wang, C., & Liu, B. (2015). Liji [Book of Rites] (2nd ed.). Nanjing: Southeast University Press. • Dewey, J. (1937). President Hutchins’ proposals to remake higher education. The Social Frontier, 3(22), 103–104. • European Commission (2002). From Prague to Berlin. The EU contribution. Progress report (document N° A2/PVDH, 1–8-2002). • European Commission (2003). From Prague to Berlin. The EU contribution. Second progress report (document N° A2/PVDH, 15–2-2003-rev). • Hayhoe, R. (1996). China’s universities—1895-1995: a century of cultural conflict. Garland Studies in Higher Education, Volume 4. Garland Reference Library of Social Science, Volume 997. 10.4324/9780203344804. • Hayhoe, R. (2001). Lessons from the Chinese academy. Knowledge across cultures: A contribution to dialogue among civilizations, 323–347. • Hayhoe, R.
The historical debate between a liberal orientation of university education and a university education with a more practical orientation has been reproduced by defenders and detractors of the course that is being adopted by the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Instead of resorting to a dichotomous view of these two arguments, this article employs an anthropocosmic worldview to look at the university by examining the past and present of Chinese higher education, in contrast to the philosophy and reality of the European university within the framework of the EHEA. The anthropocosmic view is central to Confucian holistic humanism, which asserts that humanity is part of a continuum consisting of community, Earth and Heaven. With the self as a ‘centre of relationships’, the individual is interconnected with an ever-expanding network of human relatedness, extending from the self to the family, the community, the country, the world and beyond. The authors argue that despite being based on a European model, the Chinese university, in fact, boasts a unique Chinese character that can be traced back to its Confucian learning tradition, which itself reflects this anthropocosmic worldview. In our world today, a world of unprecedented globalisation, an anthropocentric view of higher education is no longer sufficient. Instead, to address the challenges humanity faces, a Chinese model of the university based on anthropocosmism presents a potential new pathway for the global university of the future.
China Scholarship Council
Depto. de Estudios Educativos
Fac. de Educación
TRUE
pub