Back to Search Start Over

Wait Time Advantage for Transplant Candidates With HIV Who Accept Kidneys From Donors With HIV Under the HOPE Act.

Authors :
Motter, Jennifer
Motter, Jennifer
Hussain, Sarah
Brown, Diane
Florman, Sander
Rana, Meenakshi
Friedman-Moraco, Rachel
Gilbert, Alexander
Stock, Peter
Mehta, Shikha
Mehta, Sapna
Stosor, Valentina
Elias, Nahel
Pereira, Marcus
Haidar, Ghady
Malinis, Maricar
Morris, Michele
Hand, Jonathan
Aslam, Saima
Schaenman, Joanna
Baddley, John
Small, Catherine
Wojciechowski, David
Santos, Carlos
Blumberg, Emily
Odim, Jonah
Apewokin, Senu
Giorgakis, Emmanouil
Bowring, Mary
Werbel, William
Desai, Niraj
Tobian, Aaron
Segev, Dorry
Massie, Allan
Durand, Christine
Motter, Jennifer
Motter, Jennifer
Hussain, Sarah
Brown, Diane
Florman, Sander
Rana, Meenakshi
Friedman-Moraco, Rachel
Gilbert, Alexander
Stock, Peter
Mehta, Shikha
Mehta, Sapna
Stosor, Valentina
Elias, Nahel
Pereira, Marcus
Haidar, Ghady
Malinis, Maricar
Morris, Michele
Hand, Jonathan
Aslam, Saima
Schaenman, Joanna
Baddley, John
Small, Catherine
Wojciechowski, David
Santos, Carlos
Blumberg, Emily
Odim, Jonah
Apewokin, Senu
Giorgakis, Emmanouil
Bowring, Mary
Werbel, William
Desai, Niraj
Tobian, Aaron
Segev, Dorry
Massie, Allan
Durand, Christine
Source :
Transplantation; vol 108, iss 3
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant (KT) candidates with HIV face higher mortality on the waitlist compared with candidates without HIV. Because the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act has expanded the donor pool to allow donors with HIV (D + ), it is crucial to understand whether this has impacted transplant rates for this population. METHODS: Using a linkage between the HOPE in Action trial (NCT03500315) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 324 candidates listed for D + kidneys (HOPE) compared with 46 025 candidates not listed for D + kidneys (non-HOPE) at the same centers between April 26, 2018, and May 24, 2022. We characterized KT rate, KT type (D + , false-positive [FP; donor with false-positive HIV testing], D - [donor without HIV], living donor [LD]) and quantified the association between HOPE enrollment and KT rate using multivariable Cox regression with center-level clustering; HOPE was a time-varying exposure. RESULTS: HOPE candidates were more likely male individuals (79% versus 62%), Black (73% versus 35%), and publicly insured (71% versus 52%; P < 0.001). Within 4.5 y, 70% of HOPE candidates received a KT (41% D + , 34% D - , 20% FP, 4% LD) versus 43% of non-HOPE candidates (74% D - , 26% LD). Conversely, 22% of HOPE candidates versus 39% of non-HOPE candidates died or were removed from the waitlist. Median KT wait time was 10.3 mo for HOPE versus 60.8 mo for non-HOPE candidates ( P < 0.001). After adjustment, HOPE candidates had a 3.30-fold higher KT rate (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.30, 95% confidence interval, 2.14-5.10; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Listing for D + kidneys within HOPE trials was associated with a higher KT rate and shorter wait time, supporting the expansion of this practice for candidates with HIV.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Transplantation; vol 108, iss 3
Notes :
application/pdf, Transplantation vol 108, iss 3
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1432079564
Document Type :
Electronic Resource