Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical guideline on reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with life threatening bleeding
- Source :
- Grottke , O , Afshari , A , Ahmed , A , Arnaoutoglou , E , Bolliger , D , Fenger-Eriksen , C & von Heymann , C 2024 , ' Clinical guideline on reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with life threatening bleeding ' , European Journal of Anaesthesiology , vol. 41 , no. 5 , pp. 327-350 .
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND Anticoagulation is essential for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events. Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists in DOAC-eligible patients. The major complication of anticoagulation is serious or life-threatening haemorrhage, which may necessitate prompt haemostatic intervention. Reversal of DOACs may also be required for patients in need of urgent invasive procedures. This guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aims to provide evidence-based recommendations and suggestions on how to manage patients on DOACs undergoing urgent or emergency procedures including the treatment of DOAC-induced bleeding. DESIGN A systematic literature search was performed, examining four drug comparators (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) and clinical scenarios ranging from planned to emergency surgery with the outcomes of mortality, haematoma growth and thromboembolic complications. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Consensus on the wording of the recommendations was achieved by a Delphi process. RESULTS So far, no results from prospective randomised trials comparing two active comparators (e.g. a direct reversal agent and an unspecific haemostatic agent such as prothrombin complex concentrate: PCC) have been published yet and the majority of publications were uncontrolled and observational studies. Thus, the certainty of evidence was assessed to be either low or very low (GRADE C). Thirty-five recommendations and clinical practice statements were developed. During the Delphi process, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97.1% of recommendations and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 2.9%. DISCUSSION DOAC-specific coagulation monitoring may help in patients at risk for el<br />BACKGROUND Anticoagulation is essential for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events.Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)over vitamin K antagonists in DOAC-eligible patients. The major complication of anticoagulation is serious or life-threatening haemorrhage, which may necessitate prompt haemostatic intervention. Reversal of DOACs may also be required for patients in need of urgent invasive procedures. This guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aims to provide evidence-based recommendations and suggestions on how to manage patients on DOACs undergoing urgent or emergency procedures including the treatment of DOAC-induced bleeding. DESIGN A systematic literature search was performed, examining four drug comparators (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) and clinical scenarios ranging from planned to emergency surgery with the outcomes of mortality, haematoma growth and thromboembolic complications. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Consensus on the wording of the recommendations was achieved by a Delphi process. RESULTS So far, no results from prospective randomised trials comparing two active comparators (e.g. a direct reversal agent and an unspecific haemostatic agent such as prothrombin complex concentrate: PCC) have been published yet and the majority of publications were uncontrolled and observational studies. Thus, the certainty of evidence was assessed to be either low or very low (GRADE C). Thirtyfive recommendations and clinical practice statements weredeveloped. During the Delphi process, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97.1% of recommendations and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 2.9%. DISCUSSION DOAC-specific coagulation monitoring may help in patients at risk for elevated DOAC levels, where as global coagulation
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- Grottke , O , Afshari , A , Ahmed , A , Arnaoutoglou , E , Bolliger , D , Fenger-Eriksen , C & von Heymann , C 2024 , ' Clinical guideline on reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with life threatening bleeding ' , European Journal of Anaesthesiology , vol. 41 , no. 5 , pp. 327-350 .
- Notes :
- English
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1439556916
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource