Back to Search Start Over

Soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft at implant sites: Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial post implant loading

Authors :
Thoma, Daniel S; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-7447
Gasser, Thomas J W; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-6065
Hämmerle, Christoph H F; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-7347
Strauss, Franz J; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-7327
Jung, Ronald E; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320
Thoma, Daniel S; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-7447
Gasser, Thomas J W; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-6065
Hämmerle, Christoph H F; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-7347
Strauss, Franz J; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-7327
Jung, Ronald E; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320
Source :
Thoma, Daniel S; Gasser, Thomas J W; Hämmerle, Christoph H F; Strauss, Franz J; Jung, Ronald E (2023). Soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft at implant sites: Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial post implant loading. Journal of Periodontology, 94(2):230-243.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND Interventions to augment the mucosal thickness around dental implants are indicated to optimize esthetics and maintain peri-implant health. However, there is a lack of clinical data on the long-term performance of soft tissue substitutes, such as volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX), compared to autogenous grafts, such as subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs). This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess 5-year data on clinical and radiographic outcomes at implant sites previously augmented with VCMX or SCTG. METHODS Twenty patients were randomly assigned for soft tissue augmentation with VCMX or SCTG at single implant sites. Following abutment connection, final restorations were inserted (baseline; BL) and patients were reexamined up to 5 years (FU-5). Measurements included clinical data, marginal bone levels, mucosal thickness, and ridge contour changes. Nonparametric tests and estimates were applied for the statistical analysis. RESULTS The median buccal mucosal thickness increased by 0.3 mm (Q1: -0.8; Q3: 1.0) in the VCMX group (P = 0.656) and 0.3 mm (Q1: 0.0; Q3: 1.0) in the SCTG group (P = 0.188) between BL and FU-5 (intergroup P = 0.752), while the ridge contour decreased by a median of -0.3 mm (-0.9; -0.1) (P = 0.078) for VCMX and -0.3 mm (-0.4; -0.2) (P = 0.039) for SCTG (intergroup P = 0.817). Peri-implant health was maintained in both groups with stable clinical and radiographic outcomes and without significant differences between the treatments. CONCLUSION Despite the limited power and considerable dropout rate in the present study, soft tissue augmentation at implant sites with either VCMX or SCTG resulted in similar stable peri-implant tissues, favorable esthetics, and clinically negligible contour changes at 5 years post loading.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Thoma, Daniel S; Gasser, Thomas J W; Hämmerle, Christoph H F; Strauss, Franz J; Jung, Ronald E (2023). Soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft at implant sites: Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial post implant loading. Journal of Periodontology, 94(2):230-243.
Notes :
application/pdf, info:doi/10.5167/uzh-228488, English, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1443050517
Document Type :
Electronic Resource