Back to Search Start Over

Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target

Authors :
Wollenberg, Eva
Richards, Meryl
Smith, Pete
Havlík, Petr
Obersteiner, Michael
Tubiello, Francesco N.
Herold, Martin
Gerber, Pierre
Carter, Sarah
Reisinger, Andrew
van Vuuren, Detlef P.
Dickie, Amy
Neufeldt, Henry
Sander, Björn O.
Wassmann, Reiner
Sommer, Rolf
Amonette, James E.
Falcucci, Alessandra
Herrero, Mario
Opio, Carolyn
Roman-Cuesta, Rosa Maria
Stehfest, Elke
Westhoek, Henk
Ortiz-Monasterio, Ivan
Sapkota, Tek
Rufino, Mariana C.
Thornton, Philip K.
Verchot, Louis
West, Paul C.
Soussana, Jean François
Baedeker, Tobias
Sadler, Marc
Vermeulen, Sonja
Campbell, Bruce M.
Wollenberg, Eva
Richards, Meryl
Smith, Pete
Havlík, Petr
Obersteiner, Michael
Tubiello, Francesco N.
Herold, Martin
Gerber, Pierre
Carter, Sarah
Reisinger, Andrew
van Vuuren, Detlef P.
Dickie, Amy
Neufeldt, Henry
Sander, Björn O.
Wassmann, Reiner
Sommer, Rolf
Amonette, James E.
Falcucci, Alessandra
Herrero, Mario
Opio, Carolyn
Roman-Cuesta, Rosa Maria
Stehfest, Elke
Westhoek, Henk
Ortiz-Monasterio, Ivan
Sapkota, Tek
Rufino, Mariana C.
Thornton, Philip K.
Verchot, Louis
West, Paul C.
Soussana, Jean François
Baedeker, Tobias
Sadler, Marc
Vermeulen, Sonja
Campbell, Bruce M.
Source :
Global Change Biology vol.22 (2016) date: 2016-11-30 nr.12 p.3859-3864 [ISSN 1354-1013]
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

More than 100 countries pledged to reduce agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the 2015 Paris Agreement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Yet technical information about how much mitigation is needed in the sector vs. how much is feasible remains poor. We identify a preliminary global target for reducing emissions from agriculture of ~1 GtCO2e yr−1 by 2030 to limit warming in 2100 to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Yet plausible agricultural development pathways with mitigation cobenefits deliver only 21–40% of needed mitigation. The target indicates that more transformative technical and policy options will be needed, such as methane inhibitors and finance for new practices. A more comprehensive target for the 2 °C limit should be developed to include soil carbon and agriculture-related mitigation options. Excluding agricultural emissions from mitigation targets and plans will increase the cost of mitigation in other sectors or reduce the feasibility of meeting the 2 °C limit.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Global Change Biology vol.22 (2016) date: 2016-11-30 nr.12 p.3859-3864 [ISSN 1354-1013]
Notes :
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13340, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1445797812
Document Type :
Electronic Resource