Back to Search Start Over

AI-enabled cardiac chambers volumetry in coronary artery calcium scans (AI-CACTM) predicts heart failure and outperforms NT-proBNP: The multi-ethnic study of Atherosclerosis

Authors :
Naghavi, Morteza
Naghavi, Morteza
Reeves, Anthony
Budoff, Matthew
Li, Dong
Atlas, Kyle
Zhang, Chenyu
Atlas, Thomas
Roy, Sion K
Henschke, Claudia I
Wong, Nathan D
Defilippi, Christopher
Levy, Daniel
Yankelevitz, David F
Naghavi, Morteza
Naghavi, Morteza
Reeves, Anthony
Budoff, Matthew
Li, Dong
Atlas, Kyle
Zhang, Chenyu
Atlas, Thomas
Roy, Sion K
Henschke, Claudia I
Wong, Nathan D
Defilippi, Christopher
Levy, Daniel
Yankelevitz, David F
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; vol 18, iss 4, 392-400; 1934-5925
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

IntroductionCoronary artery calcium (CAC) scans contain useful information beyond the Agatston CAC score that is not currently reported. We recently reported that artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled cardiac chambers volumetry in CAC scans (AI-CAC™) predicted incident atrial fibrillation in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). In this study, we investigated the performance of AI-CAC cardiac chambers for prediction of incident heart failure (HF).MethodsWe applied AI-CAC to 5750 CAC scans of asymptomatic individuals (52% female, White 40%, Black 26%, Hispanic 22% Chinese 12%) free of known cardiovascular disease at the MESA baseline examination (2000-2002). We used the 15-year outcomes data and compared the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of AI-CAC volumetry versus NT-proBNP, Agatston score, and 9 known clinical risk factors (age, gender, diabetes, current smoking, hypertension medication, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL, HDL for predicting incident HF over 15 years.ResultsOver 15 years of follow-up, 256 HF events accrued. The time-dependent AUC [95% CI] at 15 years for predicting HF with AI-CAC all chambers volumetry (0.86 [0.82,0.91]) was significantly higher than NT-proBNP (0.74 [0.69, 0.77]) and Agatston score (0.71 [0.68, 0.78]) (p ​< ​0.0001), and comparable to clinical risk factors (0.85, p ​= ​0.4141). Category-free Net Reclassification Index (NRI) [95% CI] adding AI-CAC LV significantly improved on clinical risk factors (0.32 [0.16,0.41]), NT-proBNP (0.46 [0.33,0.58]), and Agatston score (0.71 [0.57,0.81]) for HF prediction at 15 years (p ​< ​0.0001).ConclusionAI-CAC volumetry significantly outperformed NT-proBNP and the Agatston CAC score, and significantly improved the AUC and category-free NRI of clinical risk factors for incident HF prediction.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; vol 18, iss 4, 392-400; 1934-5925
Notes :
application/pdf, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography vol 18, iss 4, 392-400 1934-5925
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1449587288
Document Type :
Electronic Resource