Back to Search Start Over

The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function

Authors :
Carrington, Emma V
Carrington, Emma V
Heinrich, Henriette
Knowles, Charles H
Fox, Mark
Rao, Satish
Altomare, Donato F
Bharucha, Adil E
Burgell, Rebecca
Chey, William D
Chiarioni, Guiseppe
Dinning, Philip
Emmanuel, Anton
Farouk, Ridzuan
Felt‐Bersma, Richelle JF
Jung, Kee Wook
Lembo, Anthony
Malcolm, Allison
Mittal, Ravinder K
Myung, Seung‐Jae
O’Connell, P Ronan
Pehl, Christian
Remes‐Troche, Jose María
Reveille, R Matthew
Vaizey, Carolynne J
Vitton, Veronique
Whitehead, William E
Wong, Reuben K
Scott, S Mark
Group, All members of the International Anorectal Physiology Working
Carrington, Emma V
Carrington, Emma V
Heinrich, Henriette
Knowles, Charles H
Fox, Mark
Rao, Satish
Altomare, Donato F
Bharucha, Adil E
Burgell, Rebecca
Chey, William D
Chiarioni, Guiseppe
Dinning, Philip
Emmanuel, Anton
Farouk, Ridzuan
Felt‐Bersma, Richelle JF
Jung, Kee Wook
Lembo, Anthony
Malcolm, Allison
Mittal, Ravinder K
Myung, Seung‐Jae
O’Connell, P Ronan
Pehl, Christian
Remes‐Troche, Jose María
Reveille, R Matthew
Vaizey, Carolynne J
Vitton, Veronique
Whitehead, William E
Wong, Reuben K
Scott, S Mark
Group, All members of the International Anorectal Physiology Working
Source :
Neurogastroenterology & Motility; vol 32, iss 1, e13679; 1350-1925
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

BackgroundThis manuscript summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance, terminology used, and interpretation of anorectal function testing including anorectal manometry (focused on high-resolution manometry), the rectal sensory test, and the balloon expulsion test. Based on these measurements, a classification system for disorders of anorectal function is proposed.MethodsTwenty-nine working group members (clinicians/academics in the field of gastroenterology, coloproctology, and gastrointestinal physiology) were invited to six face-to-face and three remote meetings to derive consensus between 2014 and 2018.Key recommendationsThe IAPWG protocol for the performance of anorectal function testing recommends a standardized sequence of maneuvers to test rectoanal reflexes, anal tone and contractility, rectoanal coordination, and rectal sensation. Major findings not seen in healthy controls defined by the classification are as follows: rectoanal areflexia, anal hypotension and hypocontractility, rectal hyposensitivity, and hypersensitivity. Minor and inconclusive findings that can be present in health and require additional information prior to diagnosis include anal hypertension and dyssynergia.Conclusions and inferencesThis framework introduces the IAPWG protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function based on objective physiological measurement. The use of a common language to describe results of diagnostic tests, standard operating procedures, and a consensus classification system is designed to bring much-needed standardization to these techniques.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Neurogastroenterology & Motility; vol 32, iss 1, e13679; 1350-1925
Notes :
application/pdf, Neurogastroenterology & Motility vol 32, iss 1, e13679 1350-1925
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1464641560
Document Type :
Electronic Resource