Back to Search Start Over

Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry.

Authors :
Bangma, C
Doan, P
Zhu, L
Remmers, S
Nieboer, D
Helleman, J
Roobol, MJ
Sugimoto, M
Chung, BH
Lee, LS
Frydenberg, M
Klotz, L
Peacock, M
Perry, A
Bjartell, A
Rannikko, A
Van Hemelrijck, M
Dasgupta, P
Moore, C
Trock, BJ
Pavlovich, C
Steyerberg, E
Carroll, P
Koo, KC
Hayen, A
Thompson, J
Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium
Bangma, C
Doan, P
Zhu, L
Remmers, S
Nieboer, D
Helleman, J
Roobol, MJ
Sugimoto, M
Chung, BH
Lee, LS
Frydenberg, M
Klotz, L
Peacock, M
Perry, A
Bjartell, A
Rannikko, A
Van Hemelrijck, M
Dasgupta, P
Moore, C
Trock, BJ
Pavlovich, C
Steyerberg, E
Carroll, P
Koo, KC
Hayen, A
Thompson, J
Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr. METHODS: Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000-2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (>99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10-15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10-15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Active surveillance

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1479312816
Document Type :
Electronic Resource