Back to Search Start Over

DE-PASS best evidence statement (BESt): determinants of adolescents’ device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour in settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Kolovelonis, Athanasio
Syrmpas, Ioanni
Marcuzzi, Anna
Khudair, Mohammed
Ng, Kwok
Tempest, Gavin Daniel
Peric, Ratko
Bartoš, František
Maier, Maximilian
Brandes, Mirko
Carlin, Angela
Ciaccioni, Simone
Cortis, Cristina
Corvino, Chiara
Di Credico, Andrea
Drid, Patrik
Gallè, Francesca
Izzicupo, Pascal
Jahre, Henriette
Kongsvold, Atle
Kouidi, Evangelia
Mork, Paul Jarle
Palumbo, Federico
Rumbold, Penny Louise Sheena
Sandu, Petru
Stavnsbo, Mette
Vilela, Sofia
Woods, Catherine
Wunsch, Kathrin
Capranica, Laura
Macdonncha, Ciaran
Ling, Fiona Chun Man
Null, Null
Corvino, Chiara (ORCID:0000-0002-3909-7618)
Kolovelonis, Athanasio
Syrmpas, Ioanni
Marcuzzi, Anna
Khudair, Mohammed
Ng, Kwok
Tempest, Gavin Daniel
Peric, Ratko
Bartoš, František
Maier, Maximilian
Brandes, Mirko
Carlin, Angela
Ciaccioni, Simone
Cortis, Cristina
Corvino, Chiara
Di Credico, Andrea
Drid, Patrik
Gallè, Francesca
Izzicupo, Pascal
Jahre, Henriette
Kongsvold, Atle
Kouidi, Evangelia
Mork, Paul Jarle
Palumbo, Federico
Rumbold, Penny Louise Sheena
Sandu, Petru
Stavnsbo, Mette
Vilela, Sofia
Woods, Catherine
Wunsch, Kathrin
Capranica, Laura
Macdonncha, Ciaran
Ling, Fiona Chun Man
Null, Null
Corvino, Chiara (ORCID:0000-0002-3909-7618)
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough physical activity (PA) is associated with significant health benefits, only a small percentage of adolescents meet recommended PA levels. This systematic review with meta-analysis explored the modifiable determinants of adolescents' device-based PA and/or sedentary behaviour (SB), evaluated in previous interventions and examined the associations between PA/SB and these determinants in settings.MethodsA search was conducted on five electronic databases, including papers published from January 2010 to July 2023. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) or Controlled Trials (CTs) measuring adolescents' device-based PA/SB and their modifiable determinants at least at two time points: pre- and post-intervention were considered eligible. PA/SB and determinants were the main outcomes. Modifiable determinants were classified after data extraction adopting the social-ecological perspective. Robust Bayesian meta-analyses (RoBMA) were performed per each study setting. Outcomes identified in only one study were presented narratively. The risk of bias for each study and the certainty of the evidence for each meta-analysis were evaluated. The publication bias was also checked. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021282874.ResultsFourteen RCTs (eight in school, three in school and family, and one in the family setting) and one CT (in the school setting) were included. Fifty-four modifiable determinants were identified and were combined into 33 broader determinants (21 individual-psychological, four individual-behavioural, seven interpersonal, and one institutional). RoBMAs revealed none or negligible pooled intervention effects on PA/SB or determinants in all settings. The certainty of the evidence of the impact of interventions on outcomes ranged from very low to low. Narratively, intervention effects in favour of the experimental group were detected in school setting for the determinants: knowledge of the environment for practicing PA, d = 1.84, 95%CI (1.48, 2.20), behaviour change

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1479532763
Document Type :
Electronic Resource