Back to Search Start Over

Ketamine analgo-sedation for mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: A rapid practice guideline from the Saudi Critical Care Society and the Scandinavian Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

Authors :
Amer, Marwa
Moller, Morten Hylander
Alshahrani, Mohammed
Shehabi, Yahya
Arabi, Yaseen M.
Alshamsi, Fayez
Sigurosson, Martin Ingi
Rehn, Marius
Chew, Michelle
Kalliomaeki, Maija-Liisa
Lewis, Kimberley
Al-Suwaidan, Faisal A.
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M.
Al-Fares, Abdulrahman
Alsadoon, Naif
Bell, Carolyn M.
Groth, Christine M.
Parke, Rachael
Mehta, Sangeeta
Wischmeyer, Paul E.
Omeri, Awad
Olkkola, Klaus T.
Alhazzani, Waleed
Amer, Marwa
Moller, Morten Hylander
Alshahrani, Mohammed
Shehabi, Yahya
Arabi, Yaseen M.
Alshamsi, Fayez
Sigurosson, Martin Ingi
Rehn, Marius
Chew, Michelle
Kalliomaeki, Maija-Liisa
Lewis, Kimberley
Al-Suwaidan, Faisal A.
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M.
Al-Fares, Abdulrahman
Alsadoon, Naif
Bell, Carolyn M.
Groth, Christine M.
Parke, Rachael
Mehta, Sangeeta
Wischmeyer, Paul E.
Omeri, Awad
Olkkola, Klaus T.
Alhazzani, Waleed
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BackgroundThis Rapid Practice Guideline (RPG) aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for ketamine analgo-sedation (monotherapy and adjunct) versus non-ketamine sedatives or usual care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) and to identify knowledge gaps for future research.MethodsThe RPG panel comprised 23 multinational multidisciplinary panelists, including a patient representative. An up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis constituted the evidence base. The Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, and the evidence-to-decision framework were used to assess the certainty of evidence and to move from evidence to decision/recommendation. The panel provided input on the balance of the desirable and undesirable effects, certainty of evidence, patients' values and preferences, costs, resources, equity, feasibility, acceptability, and research priorities.ResultsData from 17 randomized clinical trials (n = 898) and nine observational studies (n = 1934) were included. There was considerable uncertainty about the desirable and undesirable effects of ketamine monotherapy for analgo-sedation. The evidence was very low certainty and downgraded for risk of bias, indirectness, and inconsistency. Uncertainty or variability in values and preferences were identified. Costs, resources, equity, and acceptability were considered varied. Adjunctive ketamine therapy had no effect on mortality (within 28 days) (relative risk [RR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 1.27; low certainty), and may slightly reduce iMV duration (days) (mean difference [MD] -0.05 days; 95% CI -0.07 to -0.03; low certainty), and uncertain effect on the cumulative dose of opioids (mcg/kg/h morphine equivalent) (MD -11.6; 95% CI -20.4 to -2.7; very low certainty). Uncertain desirable effects (cumulative dose of sedatives and vasopressors) and undesirable effects (adverse event rate, delirium, arrhythmia, hepatot

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1482255211
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111.aas.14470