Search

Background: Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is a common form of treatment for displaced neck of femur fractures. There is ongoing debate as to whether cemented or uncemented HA is a more superior treatment modality. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between patients that underwent cemented HA to uncemented HA. Secondarily, we analysed the costs associated of each treatment option. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at a busy district general hospital. The study included 335 patients that were treated with either a cemented or uncemented HA for a displaced neck of femur fracture between January 2017 and December 2018. Data collected included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, treatment modality, length of stay (LOS) and general costs. Results: 197 (58.8%) of the cohort underwent cemented HA and 138 (41.2%) underwent uncemented HA. Mean age for the cemented cohort was 84.7 years and 85.9 years in the uncemented group (p = 0.31). There was no significant differences between the groups with regard to mean LOS and discharge disposition (p = 0.44). There were no significant difference in 30-day and 1-year mortality between the two groups (p = 0.2). We did find a statistically significant difference in the costings between the two procedures, with cemented HAs costing £66 more than uncemented HAs (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We found that both cemented and uncemented HAs produced comparable results. We found a statistically significant reduction in operative time and costs associated with uncemented HA. Uncemented HA implants may be considered where a shorter operation duration is essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Calcaneal fractures are rare in children. These fractures are often misdiagnosed as a consequence of their subtle clinical and radiographic presentation. The purpose of this paper was to identify prognostic factors on the basis of type of fracture, age and treatment. This would enable suggestions to be made with regards to treatment for these fractures.Methods: A full literature search was performed to find studies that were clinically orientated, in the English language and involved children (under the age of 16). Studies with no outcome data were excluded.Results: There were a total of 284 patients reviewed in 26 peer-review publications. Two hundred and eight patients had intra-articular fractures. The non-operatively managed joint depression type fractures had poor outcomes in 21% of patients. In those who underwent surgical fixation for these fractures, 3 patients had reduced subtalar motion, and three had pain, one of whom required a subtalar arthrodesis at 7 months. In the tongue type fracture group, the outcomes were similar in those treated operatively and non-operatively. Extra-articular fractures were found to be much less common than the intra-articular fractures. They also became less common in older children. Generally, the outcomes were good, irrespective of treatment. Only 2 patients with type 1B fractures had poorer outcomes.Discussion: This is a rare injury and outcomes may be poorer in those who do not have adequate anatomical reduction. Displaced intra-articular fractures in all age groups should be considered for anatomical reduction of the articular surface, to guarantee good outcomes and prevent future pain and arthritis. Extra-articular fractures in children are less severe, do well with conservative treatment, and rarely require operative intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]