Search

DNA replication and RNA transcription processes compete for the same DNA template and, thus, frequently collide. These transcription–replication collisions are thought to lead to genomic instability, which places a selective pressure on organisms to avoid them. Here, we review the predisposing causes, molecular mechanisms, and downstream consequences of transcription–replication collisions (TRCs) with a strong emphasis on prokaryotic model systems, before contrasting prokaryotic findings with cases in eukaryotic systems. Current research points to genomic structure as the primary determinant of steady‐state TRC levels and RNA polymerase regulation as the primary inducer of excess TRCs. We review the proposed mechanisms of TRC‐induced DNA damage, attempting to clarify their mechanistic requirements. Finally, we discuss what drives genomes to select against TRCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As previously published, the MMPOWER-3 clinical trial did not demonstrate a significant benefit of elamipretide treatment in a genotypically diverse population of adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy (PMM). However, the prespecified subgroup of subjects with disease-causing nuclear DNA (nDNA) pathogenic variants receiving elamipretide experienced an improvement in the six-minute walk test (6MWT), while the cohort of subjects with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) pathogenic variants showed no difference versus placebo. These published findings prompted additional genotype-specific post hoc analyses of the MMPOWER-3 trial. Here, we present these analyses to further investigate the findings and to seek trends and commonalities among those subjects who responded to treatment, to build a more precise Phase 3 trial design for further investigation in likely responders. Results: Subjects with mtDNA pathogenic variants or single large-scale mtDNA deletions represented 74% of the MMPOWER-3 population, with 70% in the mtDNA cohort having either single large-scale mtDNA deletions or MT-TL1 pathogenic variants. Most subjects in the nDNA cohort had pathogenic variants in genes required for mtDNA maintenance (mtDNA replisome), the majority of which were in POLG and TWNK. The mtDNA replisome post-hoc cohort displayed an improvement on the 6MWT, trending towards significant, in the elamipretide group when compared with placebo (25.2 ± 8.7 m versus 2.0 ± 8.6 m for placebo group; p = 0.06). The 6MWT results at week 24 in subjects with replisome variants showed a significant change in the elamipretide group subjects who had chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) (37.3 ± 9.5 m versus − 8.0 ± 10.7 m for the placebo group; p = 0.0024). Pharmacokinetic (exposure–response) analyses in the nDNA cohort showed a weak positive correlation between plasma elamipretide concentration and 6MWT improvement. Conclusions: Post hoc analyses indicated that elamipretide had a beneficial effect in PMM patients with mtDNA replisome disorders, underscoring the importance of considering specific genetic subtypes in PMM clinical trials. These data serve as the foundation for a follow-up Phase 3 clinical trial (NuPOWER) which has been designed as described in this paper to determine the efficacy of elamipretide in patients with mtDNA maintenance-related disorders. Classification of evidence: Class I ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03323749 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Duplication of the genome requires the replication apparatus to overcome a variety of impediments, including covalent DNA adducts, the most challenging of which is on the leading template strand. Replisomes consist of two functional units, a helicase to unwind DNA and polymerases to synthesize it. The helicase is a multi-protein complex that encircles the leading template strand and makes the first contact with a leading strand adduct. The size of the channel in the helicase would appear to preclude transit by large adducts such as DNA: protein complexes (DPC). Here we discuss some of the extensively studied pathways that support replication restart after replisome encounters with leading template strand adducts. We also call attention to recent work that highlights the tolerance of the helicase for adducts ostensibly too large to pass through the central channel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcription and replication both require large macromolecular complexes to act on a DNA template, yet these machineries cannot simultaneously act on the same DNA sequence. Conflicts between the replication and transcription machineries (transcription–replication conflicts, or TRCs) are widespread in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and have the capacity to both cause DNA damage and compromise complete, faithful replication of the genome. This review will highlight recent studies investigating the genomic locations of TRCs and the mechanisms by which they may be prevented, mitigated, or resolved. We address work from both model organisms and mammalian systems but predominantly focus on multicellular eukaryotes owing to the additional complexities inherent in the coordination of replication and transcription in the context of cell type–specific gene expression and higher-order chromatin organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over 1.2 million deaths are attributed to multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria each year. Persistence of MDR bacteria is primarily due to the molecular mechanisms that permit fast replication and rapid evolution. As many pathogens continue to build resistance genes, current antibiotic treatments are being rendered useless and the pool of reliable treatments for many MDR-associated diseases is thus shrinking at an alarming rate. In the development of novel antibiotics, DNA replication is still a largely underexplored target. This review summarises critical literature and synthesises our current understanding of DNA replication initiation in bacteria with a particular focus on the utility and applicability of essential initiation proteins as emerging drug targets. A critical evaluation of the specific methods available to examine and screen the most promising replication initiation proteins is provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate replication of the genome is fundamental to cellular survival and tumor prevention. The DNA replication fork is vulnerable to DNA lesions and damages that impair replisome progression, and improper control over DNA replication stress inevitably causes fork stalling and collapse, a major source of genome instability that fuels tumorigenesis. The integrity of the DNA replication fork is maintained by the fork protection complex (FPC), in which TIMELESS (TIM) constitutes a key scaffold that couples the CMG helicase and replicative polymerase activities, in conjunction with its interaction with other proteins associated with the replication machinery. Loss of TIM or the FPC in general results in impaired fork progression, elevated fork stalling and breakage, and a defect in replication checkpoint activation, thus underscoring its pivotal role in protecting the integrity of both active and stalled replication forks. TIM is upregulated in multiple cancers, which may represent a replication vulnerability of cancer cells that could be exploited for new therapies. Here, we discuss recent advances on our understanding of the multifaceted roles of TIM in DNA replication and stalled fork protection, and how its complex functions are engaged in collaboration with other genome surveillance and maintenance factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At the core of cellular life lies a carefully orchestrated interplay of DNA replication, recombination, chromatin assembly, sister-chromatid cohesion and transcription. These fundamental processes, while seemingly discrete, are inextricably linked during genome replication. A set of replisome factors integrate various DNA transactions and contribute to the transient formation of sister chromatid junctions involving either the cohesin complex or DNA four-way junctions. The latter structures serve DNA damage bypass and may have additional roles in replication fork stabilization or in marking regions of replication fork blockage. Here, we will discuss these concepts based on the ability of one replisome component, Ctf4, to act as a hub and functionally link these processes during DNA replication to ensure genome maintenance. • Ctf4 is a replisome hub connecting DNA replication with other metabolism processes. • Ctf4 interacting peptides (CIP) and other domains link replication factors to Ctf4. • Ctf4 interactions contribute to cohesion, recombination and chromatin structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cellular functions depend on the dynamic assembly of protein regulator complexes at specific cellular locations. Single Molecule Tracking (SMT) is a method of choice for the biochemical characterization of protein dynamics in vitro and in vivo. SMT follows individual molecules in live cells and provides direct information about their behavior. SMT was successfully applied to mammalian models. However, mammalian cells provide a complex environment where protein mobility depends on numerous factors that are difficult to control experimentally. Therefore, yeast cells, which are unicellular and well-studied with a small and completely sequenced genome, provide an attractive alternative for SMT. The simplicity of organization, ease of genetic manipulation, and tolerance to gene fusions all make yeast a great model for quantifying the kinetics of major enzymes, membrane proteins, and nuclear and cellular bodies. However, very few researchers apply SMT techniques to yeast. Our goal is to promote SMT in yeast to a wider research community. Our review serves a dual purpose. We explain how SMT is conducted in yeast cells, and we discuss the latest insights from yeast SMT while putting them in perspective with SMT of higher eukaryotes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Topoisomerase 1 cleavage complexes (Top1-ccs) comprise a DNA-protein crosslink and a single-stranded DNA break that can significantly impact the DNA replication machinery (replisome). Consequently, inhibitors that trap Top1-ccs are used extensively in research and clinical settings to generate DNA replication stress, yet how the replisome responds upon collision with a Top1-cc remains obscure. By reconstituting collisions between budding yeast replisomes, assembled from purified proteins, and site-specific Top1-ccs, we have uncovered mechanisms underlying replication fork stalling and collapse. We find that stalled replication forks are surprisingly stable and that their stability is influenced by the template strand that Top1 is crosslinked to, the fork protection complex proteins Tof1-Csm3 (human TIMELESS-TIPIN), and the convergence of replication forks. Moreover, nascent-strand mapping and cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) of stalled forks establishes replisome remodeling as a key factor in the initial response to Top1-ccs. These findings have important implications for the use of Top1 inhibitors in research and in the clinic. [Display omitted] • Reconstitution of collisions between in vitro -assembled replisomes and Top1-ccs • The template strand that a Top1-cc is crosslinked to heavily influences collisions • Fork protection factors Tof1-Csm3 mediate fork pausing at a leading-strand Top1-cc • Cryo-EM and biochemical data suggest replisome remodeling upon Top1-cc collision Using biochemical and structural approaches, Westhorpe et al. have characterized the response of the core DNA replication machinery to topoisomerase 1-DNA crosslinks. This work reveals that the context in which replication forks meet these crosslinks is key to the outcome and suggests replisome remodeling as a feature of such collisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An organism's genomic DNA must be accurately duplicated during each cell cycle. DNA synthesis is catalysed by DNA polymerase enzymes, which extend nucleotide polymers in a 5′ to 3′ direction. This inherent directionality necessitates that one strand is synthesised forwards (leading), while the other is synthesised backwards discontinuously (lagging) to couple synthesis to the unwinding of duplex DNA. Eukaryotic cells possess many diverse polymerases that coordinate to replicate DNA, with the three main replicative polymerases being Pol α, Pol δ and Pol ε. Studies conducted in yeasts and human cells utilising mutant polymerases that incorporate molecular signatures into nascent DNA implicate Pol ε in leading strand synthesis and Pol α and Pol δ in lagging strand replication. Recent structural insights have revealed how the spatial organization of these enzymes around the core helicase facilitates their strand-specific roles. However, various challenging situations during replication require flexibility in the usage of these enzymes, such as during replication initiation or encounters with replication-blocking adducts. This review summarises the roles of the replicative polymerases in bulk DNA replication and explores their flexible and dynamic deployment to complete genome replication. We also examine how polymerase usage patterns can inform our understanding of global replication dynamics by revealing replication fork directionality to identify regions of replication initiation and termination. • Canonical polymerase roles were defined by several innovative techniques. • The structure of the replisome, built around the helicase, dictates polymerase use. • Pol δ is used flexibly for different replication stages and DNA damage tolerance. • Mapping polymerase usage reveals global replication dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The human replisome is an elaborate arrangement of molecular machines responsible for accurate chromosome replication. At its heart is the CDC45‐MCM‐GINS (CMG) helicase, which, in addition to unwinding the parental DNA duplex, arranges many proteins including the leading‐strand polymerase Pol ε, together with TIMELESS‐TIPIN, CLASPIN and AND‐1 that have key and varied roles in maintaining smooth replisome progression. How these proteins are coordinated in the human replisome is poorly understood. We have determined a 3.2 Å cryo‐EM structure of a human replisome comprising CMG, Pol ε, TIMELESS‐TIPIN, CLASPIN and AND‐1 bound to replication fork DNA. The structure permits a detailed understanding of how AND‐1, TIMELESS‐TIPIN and Pol ε engage CMG, reveals how CLASPIN binds to multiple replisome components and identifies the position of the Pol ε catalytic domain. Furthermore, the intricate network of contacts contributed by MCM subunits and TIMELESS‐TIPIN with replication fork DNA suggests a mechanism for strand separation. SYNOPSIS: Cryo‐EM structures of the core human replisome reveal its complex architecture and show how TIMELESS‐TIPIN, AND‐1, Pol ε and CLASPIN engage the CMG helicase. Contacts between MCM subunits and DNA suggest a mechanism for strand separation. High‐resolution structure of a reconstituted human replisome comprising the CMG helicase, AND‐1, TIMELESS‐TIPIN, Pol ε, CLASPIN and fork DNA.Detailed description of the protein‐protein and protein‐DNA contacts that underpin the organisation of the human replisome.Atomic model for three regions of CLASPIN showing how the protein extends across one side of the replisome contacting TIMELESS, MCM2 and MCM6.Identification of a specific conformation for the catalytic domain of Pol ε, demonstrating that Pol ε can adopt a "linear" configuration in the human replisome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human development and tissue homeostasis depend on the regulated control of cellular proliferation and differentiation. DNA replication is essential to couple genome duplication and cell division with the establishment and maintenance of cellular differentiation programs. In eukaryotes, DNA replication is performed by a large machine known as the 'replisome,' which is strictly regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Inherited mutations of replisome components have been identified in a range of genetic conditions characterised by developmental abnormalities and reduced organismal growth in addition to an involvement of the immune and endocrine systems and/or heightened tumour predisposition. Here, we review the current knowledge of the molecular genetics of replisome dysfunction disorders and discuss recent mechanistic insights into their pathogenesis, with a focus on the specific steps of DNA replication affected in these human diseases. DNA replication is performed by a multiprotein complex known as the 'replisome,' which is assembled and regulated in a cell cycle–dependent manner. Hypomorphic mutations of components of the replisome lead to defective development, reduced growth, and altered tissue homeostasis. Whole-genome sequencing studies significantly expanded the repertoire of mendelian diseases caused by mutation of the replication machinery. Phenotypic analysis and mechanistic studies support defective replication origin assembly and activation and perturbation of replication fork stability as the pathogenetic mechanisms of replication-linked human genetic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The high‐fidelity replicative DNA polymerases, Pol ε and Pol δ, are generally thought to be poorly equipped to replicate damaged DNA. Direct and complete replication of a damaged template therefore typically requires the activity of low‐fidelity translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases. Here we show that a yeast replisome, reconstituted with purified proteins, is inherently tolerant of the common oxidative lesion thymine glycol (Tg). Surprisingly, leading‐strand Tg was bypassed efficiently in the presence and absence of the TLS machinery. Our data reveal that following helicase–polymerase uncoupling a switch from Pol ε, the canonical leading‐strand replicase, to the lagging‐strand replicase Pol δ, facilitates rapid, efficient and error‐free lesion bypass at physiological nucleotide levels. This replicase switch mechanism also promotes bypass of the unrelated oxidative lesion, 8‐oxoguanine. We propose that replicase switching may promote continued leading‐strand synthesis whenever the replisome encounters leading‐strand damage that is bypassed more efficiently by Pol δ than by Pol ε. Synopsis: Complete replication of damaged DNA usually requires dedicated low‐fidelity translesion synthesis polymerases. Here, studies with in vitro‐reconstituted pure yeast replisomes show their inherent ability to bypass the common lesion, thymine glycol, through internal replicase switching. The eukaryotic replisome is tolerant of oxidative base damage in the leading‐strand template.This tolerance does not require canonical translesion synthesis machinery.Base damage causes disengagement of the catalytic subunit of Pol ε from the nascent strand, resulting in uncoupled fork progression.Upon uncoupling, a switch to the lagging strand replicase Pol δ on the nascent leading strand promotes lesion bypass and recoupling.Replicase switching promotes rapid and error‐free lesion bypass at physiological nucleotide levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Efficient and faithful replication of the genome is essential to maintain genome stability. Replication is carried out by a multiprotein complex called the replisome, which encounters numerous obstacles to its progression. Failure to bypass these obstacles results in genome instability and may facilitate errors leading to disease. Cells use accessory helicases that help the replisome bypass difficult barriers. All eukaryotes contain the accessory helicase Pif1, which tracks in a 5'-3' direction on single-stranded DNA and plays a role in genome maintenance processes. Here, we reveal a previously unknown role for Pif1 in replication barrier bypass. We use an in vitro reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae replisome to demonstrate that Pif1 enables the replisome to bypass an inactive (i.e., dead) Cas9 (dCas9) R-loop barrier. Interestingly, dCas9 R-loops targeted to either strand are bypassed with similar efficiency. Furthermore, we employed a singlemolecule fluorescence visualization technique to show that Pif1 facilitates this bypass by enabling the simultaneous removal of the dCas9 protein and the R-loop. We propose that Pif1 is a general displacement helicase for replication bypass of both R-loops and protein blocks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In eukaryotes three DNA polymerases (Pols), α, δ, and ε, are tasked with bulk DNA synthesis of nascent strands during genome duplication. Most evidence supports a model where Pol α initiates DNA synthesis before Pol ε and Pol δ replicate the leading and lagging strands, respectively. However, a number of recent reports, enabled by advances in biochemical and genetic techniques, have highlighted emerging roles for Pol δ in all stages of leading-strand synthesis; initiation, elongation, and termination, as well as fork restart. By focusing on these studies, this review provides an updated perspective on the division of labor between the replicative polymerases during DNA replication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regions of the genome with the potential to form secondary DNA structures pose a frequent and significant impediment to DNA replication and must be actively managed in order to preserve genetic and epigenetic integrity. How the replisome detects and responds to secondary structures is poorly understood. Here, we show that a core component of the fork protection complex in the eukaryotic replisome, Timeless, harbours in its C‐terminal region a previously unappreciated DNA‐binding domain that exhibits specific binding to G‐quadruplex (G4) DNA structures. We show that this domain contributes to maintaining processive replication through G4‐forming sequences, and exhibits partial redundancy with an adjacent PARP‐binding domain. Further, this function of Timeless requires interaction with and activity of the helicase DDX11. Loss of both Timeless and DDX11 causes epigenetic instability at G4‐forming sequences and DNA damage. Our findings indicate that Timeless contributes to the ability of the replisome to sense replication‐hindering G4 formation and ensures the prompt resolution of these structures by DDX11 to maintain processive DNA synthesis. Synopsis: How eukaryotic replisomes detect and respond to DNA secondary structures is poorly understood. Here, cooperation of the fork protection complex subunit Timeless and the helicase DDX11 is found to bind and resolve G‐quadruplex (G4) DNA during replication. Timeless, a core component of the replisome, contains a C‐terminal DNA binding domain with specificity for G4 secondary structures.The DNA‐binding domain acts in partial redundancy with an adjacent PARP‐binding domain to maintain processive replication through G4s.The ability of Timeless to maintain replication through G4s requires interaction with the DDX11 helicase.Loss of Timeless or DDX11 leads to G4‐associated epigenetic instability and DNA damage [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

DNA replication is essential for cell proliferation and is one of the cell cycle stages where DNA is more vulnerable. Replication stress is a prominent property of tumor cells and an emerging target for cancer therapy. Although it is not directly involved in nucleotide incorporation, Claspin is a protein with relevant functions in DNA replication. It harbors a DNA‐binding domain that interacts preferentially with branched or forked DNA molecules. It also acts as a platform for the interaction of proteins related to DNA damage checkpoint activation, DNA repair, DNA replication origin firing, and fork progression. In order to find new proteins potentially involved in the regulation of DNA replication, we performed a two‐hybrid screen to discover new Claspin‐binding proteins. This system allowed us to identify the zinc‐finger protein OZF (ZNF146) as a new Claspin‐interacting protein. OZF is also present at replication forks and co‐immunoprecipitates not only with Claspin but also with other replisome components. Interestingly, OZF depletion does not affect DNA replication in a normal cell cycle, but its depletion induces a reduction in the fork progression rate under replication stress conditions. Our results suggest that OZF is a Claspin‐binding protein with a specific function in fork progression under replication stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increasing prevalence of drug-resistant Tuberculosis (TB) is imposing extreme difficulties in controlling the TB infection rate globally, making treatment critically challenging. To combat the prevailing situation, it is crucial to explore new anti-TB drugs with a novel mechanism of action and high efficacy. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb)DciA is an essential protein involved in bacterial replication and regulates its growth. DciA interacts with DNA and provides critical help in binding other replication machinery proteins to the DNA. Moreover, the lack of any structural homology of M.tb DciA with human proteins makes it an appropriate target for drug development. In this study, FDA-approved drugs were virtually screened against M.tb DciA to identify potential inhibitors. Four drugs namely Lanreotide, Risedronate, Triflusal, and Zoledronic acid showed higher molecular docking scores. Further, molecular dynamics simulations analysis of DciA-drugs complexes reported stable interaction, more compactness, and reduced atomic motion. The anti-TB activity of drugs was further evaluated under in vitro and ex vivo conditions where Triflusal was observed to have the best possible activity with the MIC of 25 μg/ml. Our findings present novel DciA inhibitors and anti-TB activity of Triflusal. Further investigations on the use of Triflusal may lead to the discovery of a new anti-TB drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The replisome is a multiprotein machine that is responsible for replicating DNA. During active DNA synthesis, the replisome tightly associates with DNA. In contrast, after DNA damage, the replisome may disassemble, exposing DNA to breaks and threatening cell survival. Using live cell imaging, we studied the effect of UV light on the replisome of Escherichia coli. Surprisingly, our results showed an increase in Pol III holoenzyme (Pol III HE) foci post-UV that do not colocalize with the DnaB helicase. Formation of these foci is independent of active replication forks and dependent on the presence of the χ subunit of the clamp loader, suggesting recruitment of Pol III HE at sites of DNA repair. Our results also showed a decrease of DnaB helicase foci per cell after UV, consistent with the disassembly of a fraction of the replisomes. By labeling newly synthesized DNA, we demonstrated that a drop in the rate of synthesis is not explained by replisome disassembly alone. Instead, we show that most replisomes continue synthesizing DNA at a slower rate after UV. We propose that the slowdown in replisome activity is a strategy to prevent clashes with engaged DNA repair proteins and preserve the integrity of the replication fork. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The disassembly of eukaryotic replisome during replication termination is mediated by CRL-dependent poly-ubiquitylation of Mcm7 and p97 segregase. The replisome also disassembles at stalled or collapsed replication forks under certain stress conditions, but the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we discovered a novel pathway driving stepwise disassembly of the replisome at stalled replication forks after forced entry into M-phase using Xenopus egg extracts. This pathway was dependent on M-CDK activity and K48- and K63-linked poly-ubiquitylation but not on CRL and p97, which is different from known pathways. Furthermore, this pathway could not disassemble converged replisomes whose Mcm7 subunit had been poly-ubiquitylated without p97. These results suggest that there is a distinctive pathway for replisome disassembly when stalled replication forks persist into M-phase. Highlights • Forced entry into M-phase drives replisome disassembly at stalled replication forks. • CDK activity and K48- and K63-linked ubiquitylation is required for mitotic replisome disassembly. • Mitotic replisome disassembly is mechanistically distinct from that of replication termination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The coding sequences of plant mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes present a lower mutation rate than the coding sequences of animal mitochondria. However, plant mitochondrial genomes frequently rearrange and present high mutation rates in their noncoding sequences. DNA replication in plant organelles is carried out by two DNA polymerases (DNAP) paralogs. In Arabidopsis thaliana at least one DNAP paralog (AtPolIA or AtPolIB) is necessary for plant viability, suggesting that both genes are partially redundant. To understand how AtPolIs replicate genomes that present low and high mutation rates, we measured their nucleotide incorporation for all 16‐base pair combinations in vitro. AtPolIA presents an error rate of 7.26 × 10−5, whereas AtPolIB has an error rate of 5.45 × 10−4. Thus, AtPolIA and AtPolIB are 3.5 and 26‐times less accurate than human mitochondrial DNAP γ. The 8‐fold difference in fidelity between both AtPolIs results from a higher catalytic efficiency in AtPolIA. Both AtPolIs extend from mismatches and the fidelity of AtPolIs ranks between high fidelity and lesion bypass DNAPs. The different nucleotide incorporation fidelity between AtPolIs predicts a prevalent role of AtPolIA in DNA replication and AtPolIB in DNA repair. We hypothesize that in plant organelles, DNA mismatches generated during DNA replication are repaired via recombination‐mediated or DNA mismatch repair mechanisms that selectively target the coding region and that the mismatches generated by AtPolIs may result in the frequent expansion and rearrangements present in plant mitochondrial genomes. In flowering plants, organellar DNA polymerases are a duplicated gene product with high sequence identity. In the plant model Arabidopsis thaliana these gene products present an 8‐fold difference in nucleotide incorporation fidelity. We hypothesize that the faithful polymerase is involved in organellar DNA replication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The eukaryotic replisome disassembles parental chromatin at DNA replication forks, but then plays a poorly understood role in the re‐deposition of the displaced histone complexes onto nascent DNA. Here, we show that yeast DNA polymerase α contains a histone‐binding motif that is conserved in human Pol α and is specific for histones H2A and H2B. Mutation of this motif in budding yeast cells does not affect DNA synthesis, but instead abrogates gene silencing at telomeres and mating‐type loci. Similar phenotypes are produced not only by mutations that displace Pol α from the replisome, but also by mutation of the previously identified histone‐binding motif in the CMG helicase subunit Mcm2, the human orthologue of which was shown to bind to histones H3 and H4. We show that chromatin‐derived histone complexes can be bound simultaneously by Mcm2, Pol α and the histone chaperone FACT that is also a replisome component. These findings indicate that replisome assembly unites multiple histone‐binding activities, which jointly process parental histones to help preserve silent chromatin during the process of chromosome duplication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rolling-circle DNA amplification is a powerful tool employed in biotechnology to produce large from small amounts of DNA. This mode of DNA replication proceeds via a DNA topology that resembles a replication fork, thus also providing experimental access to the molecular mechanisms of DNA replication. However, conventional templates do not allow controlled access to multiple fork topologies, which is an important factor in mechanistic studies. Here we present the design and production of a rolling-circle substrate with a tunable length of both the gap and the overhang, and we show its application to the bacterial DNA-replication reaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Chromosome segregation depends on sister chromatid cohesion which is established by cohesin during DNA replication. Cohesive cohesin complexes become acetylated to prevent their precocious release by WAPL before cells have reached mitosis. To obtain insight into how DNA replication, cohesion establishment and cohesin acetylation are coordinated, we analysed the interaction partners of 55 human proteins implicated in these processes by mass spectrometry. This proteomic screen revealed that on chromatin the cohesin acetyltransferase ESCO2 associates with the MCM2‐7 subcomplex of the replicative Cdc45‐MCM‐GINS helicase. The analysis of ESCO2 mutants defective in MCM binding indicates that these interactions are required for proper recruitment of ESCO2 to chromatin, cohesin acetylation during DNA replication, and centromeric cohesion. We propose that MCM binding enables ESCO2 to travel with replisomes to acetylate cohesive cohesin complexes in the vicinity of replication forks so that these complexes can be protected from precocious release by WAPL. Our results also indicate that ESCO1 and ESCO2 have distinct functions in maintaining cohesion between chromosome arms and centromeres, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcription is a key in coordinating the action of actors involved in DNA replication. The present research characterizes the impact of silicon on transcription for selected replicative genes in two diatom microalgae: Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum. We show a relationship between the RNA expression of major replicative actors and silicon concentration using q-PCR and SSH. Thanks to phylogenetical homologies with diatoms and eukaryotic genes, these results could indicate a new regulation process of cell cycle for all living beings. Our results tend to confirm initially the central role of mRNA expression control in regulating DNA replication. Silicon, as an epigenomic element, seems to impact on the expression of 15 target genes belonging to the following groups: the polymerases group, POLA2 p68 and PRIM1 p49 (DNA polymerase α/primase), DNA polymerase ε POLE1, DNA polymerase δ POLD, the PCNA sliding clamp, the ternary complex (CMG group, CDC45, subunit PSF2 of GINS, helicase subunit MCM 2,3,6), and the “maturation-promoting factor” (MPF group, CDK-A (p34cdc2). Finally, we demonstrate, by comparing the two models, that silicon promotes the expression of POLD1, POLE1, and POLE3, and PSF2 mRNA expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The eukaryotic helicase is an 11‐subunit machine containing an Mcm2‐7 motor ring that encircles DNA, Cdc45 and the GINS tetramer, referred to as CMG ( Cdc45, Mcm2‐7, GINS). CMG is “built” on DNA at origins in two steps. First, two Mcm2‐7 rings are assembled around duplex DNA at origins in G1 phase, forming the Mcm2‐7 “double hexamer.” In a second step, in S phase Cdc45 and GINS are assembled onto each Mcm2‐7 ring, hence producing two CMGs that ultimately form two replication forks that travel in opposite directions. Here, we review recent findings about CMG structure and function. The CMG unwinds the parental duplex and is also the organizing center of the replisome: it binds DNA polymerases and other factors. EM studies reveal a 20‐subunit core replisome with the leading Pol ϵ and lagging Pol α‐primase on opposite faces of CMG, forming a fundamentally asymmetric architecture. Structural studies of CMG at a replication fork reveal unexpected details of how CMG engages the DNA fork. The structures of CMG and the Mcm2‐7 double hexamer on DNA suggest a completely unanticipated process for formation of bidirectional replication forks at origins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Synchronizing the convergence of the two-oppositely moving DNA replication machineries at specific termination sites is a tightly coordinated process in bacteria. InEscherichia coli, a “replication fork trap” – found within a chromosomal region where forks are allowed to enter but not leave – is set by the protein–DNA roadblock Tus–Ter. The exact sequence of events by which Tus–Terblocks replisomes approaching from one direction but not the other has been the subject of controversy for many decades. Specific protein–protein interactions between the nonpermissive face of Tus and the approaching helicase were challenged by biochemical and structural studies. These studies show that it is the helicase-induced strand separation that triggers the formation of new Tus–Terinteractions at the nonpermissive face – interactions that result in a highly stable “locked” complex. This controversy recently gained renewed attention as three single-molecule-based studies scrutinized this elusive Tus–Termechanism – leading to new findings and refinement of existing models, but also generating new questions. Here, we discuss and compare the findings of each of the single-molecule studies to find their common ground, pinpoint the crucial differences that remain, and push the understanding of this bipartite DNA–protein system further. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

During eukaryotic DNA replication, Pol α-primase generates primers at replication origins to start leading-strand synthesis and every few hundred nucleotides during discontinuous lagging-strand replication. How Pol α-primase is targeted to replication forks to prime DNA synthesis is not fully understood. Here, by determining cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of budding yeast and human replisomes containing Pol α-primase, we reveal a conserved mechanism for the coordination of priming by the replisome. Pol α-primase binds directly to the leading edge of the CMG (CDC45-MCM-GINS) replicative helicase via a complex interaction network. The non-catalytic PRIM2/Pri2 subunit forms two interfaces with CMG that are critical for in vitro DNA replication and yeast cell growth. These interactions position the primase catalytic subunit PRIM1/Pri1 directly above the exit channel for lagging-strand template single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), revealing why priming occurs efficiently only on the lagging-strand template and elucidating a mechanism for Pol α-primase to overcome competition from RPA to initiate primer synthesis. [Display omitted] • Structures of DNA engaged yeast and human replisomes containing Pol α-primase • A conserved mechanism targets Pol α-primase to the replisome for priming • A multisite interaction network targets primase to the lagging-strand template • Direct interactions between CMG and Pol α-primase are critical for priming By determining cryo-EM structures of budding yeast and human replisomes containing the Pol α-primase complex, Jones et al. reveal a conserved mechanism for the coordination of nascent-strand priming in the eukaryotic replisome. The mechanism explains why priming by Pol α-primase is highly efficient on the lagging-strand but not leading-strand template. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Claussin et al. introduce Replicon-seq, a new genome-wide DNA sequencing technology that monitors the progression of individual replisomes at high resolution in vivo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The replisome, the multiprotein system responsible for genome duplication, is a highly dynamic complex displaying a large number of different enzyme activities. Recently, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae minimal replication reaction has been successfully reconstituted in vitro. This provided an opportunity to uncover the enzymatic activities of many of the components in a eukaryotic system. Their dynamic behavior and interactions in the context of the replisome, however, remain unclear. We use a tethered-bead assay to provide real-time visualization of leading-strand synthesis by the S. cerevisiae replisome at the single-molecule level. The minimal reconstituted leading-strand replisome requires 24 proteins, forming the CMG helicase, the Pol ε DNA polymerase, the RFC clamp loader, the PCNA sliding clamp, and the RPA single-stranded DNA binding protein. We observe rates and product lengths similar to those obtained from ensemble biochemical experiments. At the single-molecule level, we probe the behavior of two components of the replication progression complex and characterize their interaction with active leading-strand replisomes. The Minichromosome maintenance protein 10 (Mcm10), an important player in CMG activation, increases the number of productive replication events in our assay. Furthermore, we show that the fork protection complex Mrc1-Tof1-Csm3 (MTC) enhances the rate of the leading-strand replisome threefold. The introduction of periods of fast replication by MTC leads to an average rate enhancement of a factor of 2, similar to observations in cellular studies. We observe that the MTC complex acts in a dynamic fashion with the moving replisome, leading to alternating phases of slow and fast replication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biochemical and cryo-electron microscopy studies have just been published revealing interactions among proteins of the yeast replisome that are important for highly coordinated synthesis of the two DNA strands of the nuclear genome. These studies reveal key interactions important for arranging DNA polymerases α, δ, and ϵ for leading and lagging strand replication. The CMG (Mcm2-7, Cdc45, GINS) helicase is central to this interaction network. These are but the latest examples of elegant studies performed in the recent past that lead to a much better understanding of how the eukaryotic replication fork achieves efficient DNA replication that is accurate enough to prevent diseases yet allows evolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

DNAreplication results in the doubling of the genome prior to cell division. This process requires the assembly of 50 or more protein factors into a replication fork. Here, we review recent structural and biochemical insights that start to explain how specific proteins recognize DNA replication origins, load the replicative helicase on DNA, unwind DNA, synthesize newDNAstrands, and reassemble chromatin. We focus on the minichromosome maintenance (MCM2-7) proteins, which form the core of the eukaryotic replication fork, as this complex undergoes major structural rearrangements in order to engage with DNA, regulate its DNA-unwinding activity, and maintain genome stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scientific discoveries and technological advancements are inseparable but not always take place in a coherent chronological manner. In the next, we will provide a seemingly unconnected and serendipitous series of scientific facts that, in the whole, converged to unveil DNA and its duplication. We will not cover here the many and fundamental contributions from microbial genetics and in vitro biochemistry. Rather, in this journey, we will emphasize the interplay between microscopy development culminating on super resolution fluorescence microscopy (i.e., nanoscopy) and digital image analysis and its impact on our understanding of DNA duplication. We will interlace the journey with landmark concepts and experiments that have brought the cellular DNA replication field to its present state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a structure of the -650-kDa functional replisome of bacteriophage T7 assembled on DNA resembling a replication fork. A structure of the complex consisting of six domains of DNA helicase, five domains of RNA primase, two DNA polymerases, and two thioredoxin (processivity factor) molecules was determined by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. The two molecules of DNA polymerase adopt a different spatial arrangement at the replication fork, reflecting their roles in leading- and lagging-strand synthesis. The structure, in combination with biochemical data, reveals molecular mechanisms for coordination of leading- and laggingstrand synthesis. Because mechanisms of DNA replication are highly conserved, the observations are relevant to other replication systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

All living organisms need to duplicate their genetic information while protecting it from unwanted mutations, which can lead to genetic disorders and cancer development. Inaccuracies during DNA replication are the major cause of genomic instability, as replication forks are prone to stalling and collapse, resulting in DNA damage. The presence of exogenous DNA damaging agents as well as endogenous difficult-to-replicate DNA regions containing DNA-protein complexes, repetitive DNA, secondary DNA structures, or transcribing RNA polymerases, increases the risk of genomic instability and thus threatens cell survival. Therefore, understanding the cellular mechanisms required to preserve the genetic information during S phase is of paramount importance. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of how cells cope with these natural impediments in order to prevent DNA damage and genomic instability during DNA replication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The eukaryotic genome is primarily replicated by two DNA polymerases, Pol ε and Pol δ, that function on the leading and lagging strands, respectively. Previous studies have established recruitment mechanisms whereby Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS (CMG) helicase binds Pol e and tethers it to the leading strand, and PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) binds tightly to Pol δ and recruits it to the lagging strand. The current report identifies quality control mechanisms that exclude the improper polymerase from a particular strand. We find that the replication factor C (RFC) clamp loader specifically inhibits Pol ε on the lagging strand, and CMG protects Pol ε against RFC inhibition on the leading strand. Previous studies show that Pol δ is slow and distributive with CMG on the leading strand. However, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol δ-PCNA is a rapid and processive enzyme, suggesting that CMG may bind and alter Pol δ activity or position it on the lagging strand. Measurements of polymerase binding to CMG demonstrate Pol ε binds CMG with a Kd value of 12 nM, but Pol δ binding CMG is undetectable. Pol δ, like bacterial replicases, undergoes collision release upon completing replication, and we propose Pol δ-PCNA collides with the slower CMG, and in the absence of a stabilizing Pol δ-CMG interaction, the collision release process is triggered, ejecting Pol δ on the leading strand. Hence, by eviction of incorrect polymerases at the fork, the clamp machinery directs quality control on the lagging strand and CMG enforces quality control on the leading strand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Post-translational modifications regulate each step of DNA replication to ensure the faithful transmission of genetic information. In this context, we recently showed that deubiquitination of SUMO2/3 and SUMOylated proteins by USP7 helps to create a SUMO-rich and ubiquitin-low environment around replisomes that is necessary to maintain the activity of replication forks and for new origin firing. We propose that a two-flag system mediates the collective concentration of factors at sites of DNA replication, whereby SUMO and Ubiquitinated-SUMO would constitute 'stay' or 'go' signals respectively for replisome and accessory factors. We here discuss the findings that led to this model, which have implications for the potential use of USP7 inhibitors as anticancer agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eukaryotes require 3 DNA polymerases for normal replisome operations, DNA polymerases (Pol) α, delta and epsilon. Recent biochemical and structural studies support the asymmetric use of these polymerases on the leading and lagging strands. Pol epsilon interacts with the 11-subunit CMG helicase, forming a 15-protein leading strand complex that acts processively in leading strand synthesisin vitro, but Pol epsilon is inactive on the lagging strand. The opposite results are observed for Pol delta with CMG. Pol delta is highly active on the lagging strandin vitro, but has only feeble activity with CMG on the leading strand. Pol α also functions with CMG to prime both strands, and is even capable of extending both strands with CMG present. However, extensive DNA synthesis by Pol α is sharply curtailed by the presence of either Pol epsilon or Pol delta, which limits the role of the low fidelity Pol α to the initial priming of synthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

DNA replication occurs semidiscontinuously due to the antiparallel DNA strands and polarity of enzymatic DNA synthesis. Although the leading strand is synthesized continuously, the lagging strand is synthesized in small segments designated Okazaki fragments. Lagging-strand synthesis is a complex event requiring repeated cycles of RNA primer synthesis, transfer to the lagging-strand polymerase, and extension effected by cooperation between DNA primase and the lagging-strand polymerase. We examined events controlling Okazaki fragment initiation using the bacteriophage T7 replication system. Primer utilization by T7 DNA polymerase is slower than primer formation. Slow primer release from DNA primase allows the polymerase to engage the complex and is followed by a slow primer handoff step. The T7 single-stranded DNA binding protein increases primer formation and extension efficiency but promotes limited rounds of primer extension. We present a model describing Okazaki fragment initiation, the regulation of fragment length, and their implications for coordinated leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The machines that decode and regulate genetic information require the translation, transcription and replication pathways essential to all living cells. Thus, it might be expected that all cells share the same basic machinery for these pathways that were inherited from the primordial ancestor cell from which they evolved. A clear example of this is found in the translation machinery that converts RNA sequence to protein. The translation process requires numerous structural and catalytic RNAs and proteins, the central factors of which are homologous in all three domains of life, bacteria, archaea and eukarya. Likewise, the central actor in transcription, RNA polymerase, shows homology among the catalytic subunits in bacteria, archaea and eukarya. In contrast, while some “gears” of the genome replication machinery are homologous in all domains of life, most components of the replication machine appear to be unrelated between bacteria and those of archaea and eukarya. This review will compare and contrast the central proteins of the “replisome” machines that duplicate DNA in bacteria, archaea and eukarya, with an eye to understanding the issues surrounding the evolution of the DNA replication apparatus. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Environmental mutagens cause DNA damage that disturbs replication and produces mutations, leading to cancer and other diseases. We discuss mechanisms of mutagenesis resulting from DNA damage, from the level of DNA replication by a single polymerase to the complex DNA replisome of some typical model organisms (including bacteriophage T7, T4, Sulfolobus solfataricus, Escherichia coli , yeast and human). For a single DNA polymerase, DNA damage can affect replication in three major ways: reducing replication fidelity, causing frameshift mutations, and blocking replication. For the DNA replisome, protein interactions and the functions of accessory proteins can yield rather different results even with a single DNA polymerase. The mechanism of mutation during replication performed by the DNA replisome is a long-standing question. Using new methods and techniques, the replisomes of certain organisms and human cell extracts can now be investigated with regard to the bypass of DNA damage. In this review, we consider the molecular mechanism of mutagenesis resulting from DNA damage in replication at the levels of single DNA polymerases and complex DNA replisomes, including translesion DNA synthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The eukaryotic replisome is α multiprotein machine that contains DNA polymerases, sliding clamps, helicase, and primase along with several factors that participate in cell cycle and checkpoint control. The detailed structure of the 11-subunit CMG helicase (Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS) has been solved recently by cryoEM single-particle 3D reconstruction and reveals pumpjack motions that imply an unexpected mechanism of DNA translocation. CMG is also the organizing center of the replisome. Recentin vitroreconstitution of leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis has enabled structural analysis of the replisome. By building the replisome in stages from pure proteins, single-particle EM studies have identified the overall architecture of the eukaryotic replisome. Suprisingly leading and lagging strand polymerases bind to opposite faces of the CMG helicase, unlike the long-held view that DNA polymerases are located in back of the helicase to act on the unwound strands. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Posttranslational modification of proteins by means of attachment of a small globular protein ubiquitin (i.e., ubiquitylation) represents one of the most abundant and versatile mechanisms of protein regulation employed by eukaryotic cells. Ubiquitylation influences almost every cellular process and its key role in coordination of the DNA damage response is well established. In this review we focus, however, on the ways ubiquitylation controls the process of unperturbed DNA replication. We summarise the accumulated knowledge showing the leading role of ubiquitin driven protein degradation in setting up conditions favourable for replication origin licensing and S-phase entry. Importantly, we also present the emerging major role of ubiquitylation in coordination of the active DNA replication process: preventing re-replication, regulating the progression of DNA replication forks, chromatin re-establishment and disassembly of the replisome at the termination of replication forks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Billions of base pairs of DNA must be replicated trillions of times in a human lifetime. Complete and accurate replication once and only once per cell division cycle is essential to maintain genome integrity and prevent disease. Impediments to replication fork progression including difficult to replicate DNA sequences, conflicts with transcription, and DNA damage further add to the genome maintenance challenge. These obstacles frequently cause fork stalling, but only rarely cause a failure to complete replication. Robust mechanisms ensure that stalled forks remain stable and capable of either resuming DNA synthesis or being rescued by converging forks. However, when failures do happen the fork collapses leading to genome rearrangements, cell death and disease. Despite intense interest, the mechanisms to repair damaged replication forks, stabilize them, and ensure successful replication remain only partly understood. Different models of fork collapse have been proposed with varying descriptions of what happens to the DNA and replisome. Here, I will define fork collapse and describe what is known about how the replication checkpoint prevents it to maintain genome stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The T4 bacteriophage encodes eight proteins, which are sufficient to carry out coordinated leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. These purified proteins have been used to reconstitute DNA synthesis in vitro and are a well-characterized model system. Recent work on the T4 replisome has yielded more detailed insight into the dynamics and coordination of proteins at the replication fork. Since the leading and lagging strands are synthesized in opposite directions, coordination of DNA synthesis as well as priming and unwinding is accomplished by several protein complexes. These protein complexes serve to link catalytic activities and physically tether proteins to the replication fork. Essential to both leading and lagging strand synthesis is the formation of a holoenzyme complex composed of the polymerase and a processivity clamp. The two holoenzymes form a dimer allowing the lagging strand polymerase to be retained within the replisome after completion of each Okazaki fragment. The helicase and primase also form a complex known as the primosome, which unwinds the duplex DNA while also synthesizing primers on the lagging strand. Future studies will likely focus on defining the orientations and architecture of protein complexes at the replication fork. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

I spent my childhood and adolescence in North and South Carolina, attended Duke University, and then entered Duke Medical School. One year in the laboratory of George Schwert in the biochemistry department kindled my interest in biochemistry. After one year of residency on the medical service of Duke Hospital, chaired by Eugene Stead, I joined the group of Arthur Kornberg at Stanford Medical School as a postdoctoral fellow. Two years later I accepted a faculty position at Harvard Medical School, where I remain today. During these 50 years, together with an outstanding group of students, postdoctoral fellows, and collaborators, I have pursued studies on DNA replication. I have experienced the excitement of discovering a number of important enzymes in DNA replication that, in turn, triggered an interest in the dynamics of a replisome. My associations with industry have been stimulating and fostered new friendships. I could not have chosen a better career. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To ensure duplication of the entire genome, eukaryotic DNA replication initiates from thousands of replication origins. The replication forks move through the chromatin until they encounter forks from neighboring origins. During replication fork termination forks converge, the replisomes disassemble and topoisomerase II resolves the daughter DNA molecules. If not resolved efficiently, terminating forks result in genomic instability through the formation of pathogenic structures. Our recent findings shed light onto the mechanism of replisome disassembly upon replication fork termination. We have shown that termination-specific polyubiquitylation of the replicative helicase component – Mcm7, leads to dissolution of the active helicase in a process dependent on the p97/VCP/Cdc48 segregase. The inhibition of terminating helicase disassembly resulted in a replication termination defect. In this extended view we present hypothetical models of replication fork termination and discuss remaining and emerging questions in the DNA replication termination field. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

CIZ1 is a nuclear matrix protein that cooperates with cyclin A2 (encoded by CCNA2) and CDK2 to promote mammalian DNA replication. We show here thatcyclin-A-CDK2 also negatively regulates CIZ1 activity by phosphorylation atthreonines 144, 192 and 293. Phosphomimetic mutants do not promote DNA replication in cell-free and cell-based assays, and also have a dominant-negative effect on replisome formation at the level of PCNA recruitment. Phosphorylation blocks direct interaction with cyclin-A-CDK2 and recruitment of endogenous cyclin A to the nuclear matrix. In contrast, phosphomimetic CIZ1 retains the ability to bind to the nuclear matrix, and its interaction with CDC6 is not affected. Phospho-T192-specific antibodies confirm that CIZ1 is phosphorylated during S phase and G2, and show that phosphorylation at this site occurs at post-initiation concentrations of cyclin-A-CDK2. Taken together, the data suggest that CIZ1 is a kinase sensor that promotes initiation of DNA replication at low kinase levels, when in a hypophosphorylated state that is permissive for cyclin-A-CDK2 interaction and delivery to licensed origins, but blocks delivery at higher kinase levels when it is phosphorylated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for the maintenance of genome stability under normal conditions and upon DNA replication stress. Here we show that in the absence of H3 lysine 56 acetylation replisome components become deleterious when replication forks collapse at natural replication block sites. This lethality is not a direct consequence of chromatin assembly defects during replication fork progression. Rather, our genetic analyses suggest that in the presence of replicative stress H3 lysine 56 acetylation uncouples the Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS DNA helicase complex and DNA polymerases through the replisome component Ctf4. In addition, we discovered that the N-terminal domain of Ctf4, necessary for the interaction of Ctf4 with Mms22, an adaptor protein of the Rtt101 -Mms1 E3 ubiquitin ligase, is required for the function of the H3 lysine 56 acetylation pathway, suggesting that replicative stress promotes the interaction between Ctf4 and Mms22. Taken together, our results indicate that Ctf4 is an essential member of the H3 lysine 56 acetylation pathway and provide novel mechanistic insights into understanding the role of H3 lysine 56 acetylation in maintaining genome stability upon replication stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study related to the importance of disordered interdomain region of Gins for functional tetramer formation in Thermoplasma acidophilum to stimulate Multichip modules MCM helicase. Topics discussed include activation of the eukaryotic MCM by forming the CMG complex with Cdc45 and Gins, stimulation in the DNA-binding, ATPase, and helicase activities of TaMCM by interaction of TaGins51 protein with the MCM and necessity of MCM activation in formation of the Gins51 tetramer.