Search

Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis(RRP) is a rare disease with severe morbidity. Treatment is surgical. Prevailing viewpoint is that prophylactic HPV vaccines do not have therapeutic benefit due to their modus operandi. Studies on HPV vaccination alongside surgery were meta-analysed to test effect on burden of disease. Databases were accessed Nov and Dec 2021 [PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science]. Main outcome measured was: Mean paired differences in the number of surgeries or recurrences per month. Analyses was performed using: Random effect maximal likelihood estimation model using the Stata module Mataan(StataCorp. 2019. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX:StataCorp LLC.) Our results found n = 38 patients, suitable for syntheses with one previous meta-analyses (4 published, 2 unpublished studies) n = 63, total of n = 101 patients. Analyses rendered an overall reduction of 0.123 recurrences or surgeries per month (95% confidence interval [0.064, 0.183]). Our meta-analyses concludes that HPV vaccine is a beneficial adjunct therapy alongside surgery., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Head and neck cancers are unique in so far that two major oncogenic viruses, Epstein Barr virus (EBV) and Human papillomavirus (HPV) infect adjacent anatomy and cause nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal cancers, respectively. Dominant recognized carcinogens are alcohol and tobacco but some head and neck cancers have been found to have mixed carcinogens (including betel leaf, areca nuts, slaked lime, viruses, etc.) involved in their oncogenesis and conversely, groups of patients with unknown or less dominant carcinogens involved in their development. These cancers may have had viral involvement in the past but then lost most of their viral nucleic acids (be they DNA and/or RNA) below a detection threshold, thus rendering them virus-negative. Some of these virus-negative tumors appear to have mutagenic signatures associated with virus-positive cancers,  for example, from the APOBEC defense mechanism which is known to mutate viral nucleic acids as well as cause collateral damage to host DNA, with subsequent development of strongly viral prejudiced mutational signatures. These mechanisms are likely to be less efficient at oncogenesis than traditional EBV and HPV oncogenes directly driving mutagenesis, thus accounting for the smaller frequencies of these cancers found. More profound investigations of these unusual tumors are warranted to dissect out these mechanistic pathways., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

We investigated the prognostic impact of time-dependent serum free light chain ratio (FLCr) normalization in 590 patients with secretory multiple myeloma (MM) during first-line treatment within the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group MM5 trial. Serum free light chains (sFLC) were assessed by the Freelite test at baseline, after induction, mobilization, autologous blood stem cell transplantation, consolidation and every three months during maintenance or follow up within two years after the start of maintenance. The proportion of patients with a normal or normalized FLCr increased from 3.6% at baseline to 23.2% after induction and 64.7% after consolidation. The achievement of FLCr normalization at any one time before the start of maintenance was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) ( p < 0.01, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.47-0.79) and overall survival (OS) ( p = 0.02, HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48-0.93) in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analyses. Furthermore, reaching immune reconstitution, defined as the normalization of uninvolved immunoglobulins, before maintenance was associated with superior PFS ( p = 0.04, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60-0.99) and OS ( p = 0.01, HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.41-0.86). We conclude that FLCr normalization during therapy is an important favorable prognostic factor in MM. Therefore, we recommend serial measurements of sFLC during therapy until achieving FLCr normalization, even in patients with secretory MM., Competing Interests: E.-M.K.: travel, accommodations, expenses: AMGEN, BMS, Janssen. D.T.: no COI. H.J.S.: honoraria: Janssen Cilag, Takeda, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Abbvie, GSK, Chugai, Pfizer; travel, accommodations, expenses: Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, GSK. E.K.M.: honoraria: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, GSK; consulting or advisory role: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, GSK; research funding: Takeda, Celgene/BMS, GSK; travel, accommodations, expenses: Janssen, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Onyx, Mundipharma, GSK. J.D.: consulting or advisory role: Celgene; speakers bureau: Celgene; travel, accommodations, expenses: Celgene. K.C.W.: honoraria: AMGEN, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Takeda; consulting or advisory role: AMGEN, BMS, Celgene, Juno, Janssen, Adaptive, Sanofi, Takeda; research funding: AMGEN, Celgene, Sanofi, Janssen. A.B.: no COI. U.B.: travel, accommodations, expenses: Sanofi. M.A.: no COI. B.B.: no COI. M.M.: honoraria: Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Celgene, Amgen; consulting or advisory role: Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Celgene, Amgen; research funding: BMS, Incyte; travel, accommodations, expenses: Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Amgen. H.-W.L.: no COI. D.H.: consulting or advisory role: I. Lamkap Bio AG, Discoveric AG; research funding: Celgene AG, Sanofi, Engmab AG; travel, accommodations, expenses: Celgene. A.S.: consulting or advisory role: I. Lamkap Bio AG, Discoveric AG; research funding: Celgene AG, Sanofi, Engmab AG. S.L.: no COI. A.J.: no COI. A.E.: consulting or advisory role: Amgen; travel, accommodations, expenses: Janssen, Amgen. S.F.: consulting or advisory role: Sanofi, BMS, Amgen. P.B.: consulting or advisory role: BMS, AMGEN, Roche, MSD; research funding: BMS; travel, accommodations, expenses: BMS. M.G.: no COI. H.B.: no COI. M.S.R.: honoraria: Celgene, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Takeda; consulting or advisory role: Celgene, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Takeda; research funding: Celgene, Novartis, AMGEN; travel, accommodations, expenses: Janssen, BMS, Takeda. I.W.B.: research funding: Celgene, BMS, Janssen. M.H.: honoraria: Novartis, Amgen, Roche, Takeda; consulting or advisory role: Celgene. C.S.: honoraria: BMS, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda; consulting or advisory role: BMS, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda; speakers bureau: Takeda; research funding: Takeda, Novartis; travel, accommodations, expenses: BMS, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda. H.G.: honoraria: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda; consulting or advisory role: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda; speakers bureau: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda; research funding: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda; travel, accommodations, expenses: BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

The role of salvage high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (sHDCT/ASCT) for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the era of continuous novel agent treatment has not been defined. This randomized, open-label, phase III, multicenter trial randomized patients with 1st-3rd relapse of multiple myeloma (MM) to a transplant arm (n = 139) consisting of 3 Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg, day 1-21; dexamethasone 40 mg, day 1, 8, 15, and 22; 4-week cycles) reinduction cycles, sHDCT (melphalan 200 mg/m 2 ), ASCT, and lenalidomide maintenance (10 mg/day) or to a control arm (n = 138) of continuous Rd. Median PFS was 20.7 months in the transplant and 18.8 months in the control arm (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.65-1.16; p = 0.34). Median OS was not reached in the transplant and 62.7 months in the control arm (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.52-1.28; p = 0.37). Forty-one patients (29%) did not receive the assigned sHDCT/ASCT mainly due to early disease progression, adverse events, and withdrawal of consent. Multivariate landmark analyses from the time of sHDCT showed superior PFS and OS (p = 0.0087/0.0057) in patients who received sHDCT/ASCT. Incorporation of sHDCT/ASCT into relapse treatment with Rd was feasible in 71% of patients and did not significantly prolong PFS and OS on ITT analysis while patients who received sHDCT/ASCT may have benefitted.

Intensive upfront therapy in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) including induction therapy (IT), high-dose melphalan (MEL200), and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by consolidation and/or maintenance is mostly restricted to patients up to 65 years of age. Prospective phase III trial data in the era of novel agents for patients up to 70 years of age are not available. The GMMG-MM5 trial included 601 patients between 18 and 70 years of age, divided in three groups for the present analysis: ≤60 years (S1, n = 353), 61-65 years (S2, n = 107) and 66-70 years (S3, n = 141). Treatment consisted of a bortezomib-containing IT, MEL200/ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance with lenalidomide. Adherence to treatment was similar among patients of the three age groups. Overall toxicity during all treatment phases was increased in S2 and S3 compared to S1 (any adverse event/any serious adverse event: S1:81.7/41.8% vs. S2:90.7/56.5% vs. S3:87.2/68.1%, p = 0.05/<0.001). With respect to progression-free survival (log-rank p = 0.73), overall survival (log-rank p = 0.54) as well as time-to-progression (Gray's p = 0.83) and non-relapse mortality (Gray's p = 0.25), no differences were found between the three age groups. Our results imply that an intensive upfront therapy with a bortezomib-containing IT, MEL200/ASCT, lenalidomide consolidation, and maintenance should be applied to transplant-eligible MM patients up to 70 years of age.

Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MT) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but has not been compared to other agents in clinical trials. We retrospectively compared bortezomib (BTZ; n = 138) or LEN (n = 183) MT from two subsequent GMMG phase III trials. All patients received three cycles of BTZ-based triplet induction and post-ASCT MT. BTZ MT (1.3 mg/m 2 i.v.) was administered every 2 weeks for 2 years. LEN MT included two consolidation cycles (25 mg p.o., days 1-21 of 28 day cycles) followed by 10-15 mg/day for 2 years. The BTZ cohort more frequently received tandem ASCT (91% vs. 33%) due to different tandem ASCT strategies. In the LEN and BTZ cohort, 43% and 46% of patients completed 2 years of MT as intended (p = 0.57). Progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.83, p = 0.18) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.70, p = 0.15) did not differ significantly with LEN vs. BTZ MT. Patients with

The MM5 trial aimed at demonstrating a progression-free survival (PFS) difference in continued vs. response-adapted (in case of complete response, CR) lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance therapy (MT) in newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM). Patients were equally randomized to receive induction therapy with PAd (bortezomib/doxorubicin/dexamethasone) or VCD (bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone), high-dose melphalan and autologous blood stem cell transplantation, and LEN consolidation, followed by either LEN MT for a fixed duration of 2 years (LEN-2Y) or until achievement of CR (LEN-CR, intention-to-treat population n = 502): arms A1:PAd + LEN-2Y (n = 125), B1:PAd + LEN-CR (n = 126), A2:VCD + LEN-2Y (n = 126), B2:VCD + LEN-CR (n = 125). In the LEN-CR group (B1 + B2), n = 88/17.5% patients did not start or discontinued LEN MT due to CR. There was no PFS (p = 0.60, primary endpoint) nor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.15) difference between the four study arms. On pooled LEN MT strategies, OS (hazard ratio, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42, p = 0.03) but not PFS (HR = 1.15, p = 0.20) was shorter in LEN-CR (B1 + B2) vs. LEN-2Y (A1 + A2) groups. PFS was shortened on landmark analyses from the start of LEN MT in patients being in CR in the LEN-CR group (LEN-CR vs. LEN-2Y, HR = 1.84, p = 0.02). OS from first progression was shortened in the LEN-CR vs. LEN-2Y group (HR = 1.60, p = 0.01). LEN MT should be applied beyond CR for at least 2 years.

Objective: Analysis of the efficiency and toxicity of cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM)., Methods: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were mobilized with high dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m 2 daily on days 1 and 2) and G-CSF plus pre-emptive/rescue plerixafor in RMM patients (first to third relapse) treated within the ReLApsE trial of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG)., Results: Mobilization was initiated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) and G-CSF in 30 patients. Fifteen patients received additional pre-emptive/rescue administration of plerixafor. Stem cell collection was successful (≥2×10 6 CD34+ cells per kg bw) in 77% (23/30 patients). Patients with prior high-dose melphalan collected a significantly lower median total number of PBSCs than patients without prior high-dose melphalan (3.3×10 6 vs 17×10 6 CD34+ cells/kg bw). Toxicity of HD-CY was frequent with 12 serious adverse events (SAE) in 37% of patients (11/30 patients). Infections accounted for the majority of SAE reports. In two patients, SAEs were lethal (septic shock)., Conclusions: These data proof feasibility of PBSC collection at relapse but emphasize the importance of collection and storage of additional PBSC transplants during first-line treatment when mobilization is more efficient and less toxic., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Despite novel therapeutic agents, most multiple myeloma (MM) patients eventually relapse. Two large phase III trials have shown significantly improved response rates (RR) of lenalidomide/dexamethasone compared with placebo/dexamethasone in relapsed MM (RMM) patients. These results have led to the approval of lenalidomide for RMM patients and lenalidomide/dexamethasone has since become a widely accepted second-line treatment. Furthermore, in RMM patients consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to significantly increase progression free survival (PFS) as compared to cyclophosphamide in a phase III trial. The randomized prospective ReLApsE trial is designed to evaluate PFS after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction, high-dose chemotherapy consolidation plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance compared with the well-established lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients., Methods/design: ReLApsE is a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial in a planned study population of 282 RMM patients. All patients receive three lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles and--in absence of available stem cells from earlier harvesting--undergo peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvesting. Subsequently, patients in arm A continue on consecutive lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles, patients in arm B undergo high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by lenalidomide maintenance until discontinuation criteria are met. Therapeutic response is evaluated after the 3(rd) (arm A + B) and the 5(th) lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycle (arm A) or 2 months after autologous stem cell transplantation (arm B) and every 3 months thereafter (arm A + B). After finishing the study treatment, patients are followed up for survival and subsequent myeloma therapies. The expected trial duration is 6.25 years from first patient in to last patient out. The primary endpoint is PFS, secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), RR, time to best response and the influence of early versus late salvage high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation on OS., Discussion: This phase III trial is designed to evaluate whether high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction improves PFS compared with the well-established continued lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients., Trial Registration: ISRCTN16345835 (date of registration 2010-08-24).

Targeted therapies have made their way into clinical practice during the past decade. They have caused a major impact on the survival of cancer patients in many areas of clinical oncology and hematology. Indeed, in some hematologic malignancies, such as chronic myelogenous leukemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, biologicals and antibodies specifically designed to target tumour-specific proteins have revolutionized treatment standards. In solid tumours, new drugs targeting EGF- or VEGF- receptors are now approved and are entering clinical practise for treatment of colon, lung, kidney and other cancers, either alone or in combination with conventional treatment approaches. Recent data have now shown that molecular targeted therapy might display efficacy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) as well. The evaluated biologicals are generally well tolerated from HNSCC patients, who usually have the burden of multiple co-morbidities that interfere with conventional systemic treatment options. Therefore, molecular targeted therapies offer new treatment options even for heavily pretreated and seriously ill patients usually unable to tolerate chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The two most promising and advanced strategies are the blockage of growth-factor based cellular signalling and interference with angiogenesis-related pathways. But inhibitors of alternative targets, such as Scr and proteasomes, have already been evaluated in early clinical trials with HNSCC patients.

Background: Adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer represents a significant economic burden for the German health care system. The available chemotherapy regimens have significantly different medical and economic profiles., Methods: A modeling study based on published clinical trials was performed to assess costs of 5 different regimens (Mayo Clinic, LV5FU2, FOLFOX-4, Xelox, Capecitabine) from the perspective of the statutory sickness funds. Costs were calculated based on the assumption that patients were treated exactly according to a standardized clinical pathway., Results: Total costs are highest for FOLFOX-4 (H22,034/patient) and Xelox (H21,411). Lowest costs of the oxaliplatin-free treatments are associated with capecitabine (H4,935), followed by the Mayo Clinic (H6,426) and LV5FU2 protocols (H8,336). The main driver of costs in all instances is drug acquisition (90% of total costs), whereas costs of diagnostics or complications have no major impact (0.5-2%)., Conclusions: In Germany, FOLFOX-4 is the most effective but also the most expensive treatment and represents the current standard. Xelox emerges as a slightly less costly alternative when oral treatment is preferred. For patients not able to tolerate oxaliplatin-based therapy, capecitabine has the best economic profile of all alternative regimens. Drug acquisition costs are by far the most important factor driving costs in all regimens.

Background: Spinal cord compression due to extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH) is a rare manifestation of thalassemia. General therapeutic recommendations do not exist., Case Report: We report a 23 year old male with beta-thalassemia intermedia and back pain resistant to analgetic medication. Multiple extradural mass lesions on MRI of the lumbar spine were identified. Hypertransfusion was initiated with no relief of symptoms. Low dose irradiation with 20 Gy had to be added to achieve adaequate response., Result: With the combination of transfusion therapy and irradiation a rapid and long-lasting relief of symptoms was achieved. 12 month post irradiation the patient is free of pain and neurological symptoms., Conclusion: Clinical awareness of this phenomenon and knowledge of the available treatment option is essential for successful outcome. In treatment refractory symptoms irradiation could successfully contribute to a rapid therapeutic response.

Phenotypic maturation, cytokine secretion, and migration are distinct functional characteristics of dendritic cells (DCs). These functions are independently regulated by a number of extracellular variables, such as type, strength, and persistence of an array of soluble and membrane-bound mediators. Since the exact composition of these variables in response to infection may differ between individuals, the intracellular signaling pathways activated by these extracellular networks may more closely correlate with DC function and predict the course of adaptive immunity. We found that activation of p38 kinase (p38K), extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), and phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C (PC-PLC) enhanced cytokine secretion, whereas p38K, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), and PC-PLC enhanced migration. In contrast, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt-1 and cAMP inhibited cytokine secretion while ERK1/2 inhibited migration. Migration and cytokine secretion further differed in their sensitivity to inhibition over time. However, although DCs could be manipulated to express migration, cytokine secretion, or both, the level of activation or persistence of intracellular pathway signaling was not predictive. Our results suggest a modular organization of function. We hypothesize that the expression of specific DC functions integrates a large variety of activating and inhibitory variables, and is represented by the formation of a functional unit of molecular networks-the signal response module (SRM). The combined activities of these modules define the functional outcome of DC activation.

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (T(REG)) are engaged in the regulation of murine and human immune responses as well as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Despite their suppression of GvHD they do not impair graft-versus-tumor activity in the mouse, which makes T(REG) especially attractive candidates for cellular immunotherapy. T(REG) comprise only 5% to 10% of CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood and are naturally anergic, which prevented their use as therapeutic suppressor cells in the context of autoimmune or alloimmune reactions so far. We therefore developed an in vitro expansion protocol for human T(REG), breaking their anergy with anti-CD3/anti-CD28-coupled paramagnetic beads and a combination of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-15. Highly purified human T(REG) can be expanded 285-fold to 1000-fold within 20 days and keep their phenotype as well as all their suppressor functions even in the context of stimulation with mature allogeneic dendritic cells. However, we demonstrate that FoxP3 is not a reliable marker for human T(REG) as it is transiently inducible in CD4+CD25- cells upon activation with cytokines or via their T cell receptor. In addition, we successfully expanded CD4+CD25+ cells from patients after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation with or without GvHD and show that different suppressor functions might be lost independently, demonstrating that human T(REG) biology is likely more complicated than previously thought.

Reports have shown a worse outcome for donor-recipient pairs mismatched for ABO blood groups in bone marrow transplantation (BMT). These studies, however, included small and heterogeneous study populations, and not all considered bidirectional ABO incompatibility separately. Because the issue remains controversial, we analyzed the effect of ABO mismatch on the overall survival, transplant-related mortality, and occurrence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in a large homogenous group of patients undergoing allogeneic BMT. A total of 3103 patients with early-stage leukemia who underwent transplantation between 1990 and 1998 with bone marrow from an HLA-identical sibling and who were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research were studied. The median follow-up was 54 months. A total of 2108 (67.9%) donor-recipient pairs were ABO identical, 451 (14.5%) had a minor mismatch, 430 (13.9%) had a major mismatch, and 114 (3.7%) had a bidirectional ABO mismatch. The groups did not differ significantly in patient or donor characteristics except for more female-to-male sex mismatch in the bidirectional ABO mismatch group (P = .017). In multivariate models of overall survival, transplant-related mortality, and grade II to IV acute GVHD, there were no significant differences among the 4 groups. Bidirectional ABO mismatch was associated with a significantly higher risk of grade III or IV acute GVHD (hazard ratio, 1.869; 95% confidence interval, 1.192-2.93; P = .006). Patients with major ABO mismatch received red blood cell transfusions (P = .001) for a longer timer after transplantation and had a slightly slower neutrophil recovery (P < .001). There was no evidence of a substantial effect of ABO blood group incompatibility on the outcome of conventional BMT among patients with leukemia.

Background: The use of monoclonal antibodies against interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R)-alpha chains could be an effective treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Experimental model and clinical studies have reported various results., Methods: Inolimomab is a murine anti-IL-2R. Eighty-five patients were evaluated retrospectively for the safety and efficacy of inolimomab given for the treatment of steroid-resistant acute GvHD (aGvHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Diseases were immune deficiency, hematological malignancies, or solid tumors. Seventy-six percent of the patients received a myeloablative regimen. The source of HSCT was bone marrow for 45 patients, peripheral blood for 36 patients, and cord blood for 4 patients. Donors were 49 siblings and 36 unrelated. Acute GvHD was diagnosed within a median of 28 days after transplantation (grade II, 26 patients; grade III, 26 patients; grade IV, 33 patients). Inolimomab was administered in the event of steroid-resistant aGvHD with a median dose of 0.468 mg per kg (median period of treatment: 18 days)., Results: Twenty-five complete responses and 29 partial responses (total response rate: 63%) were observed with no side effects. There was no correlation between aGvHD grading and quality of response. Better responses were observed in cutaneous aGvHD. The overall survival probability was 26% (median follow-up: 20 months). Fifty-seven percent of patients died of toxicity related mortality, mostly aGvHD. Response to inolimomab seemed sustained (11% relapse in responders)., Conclusion: Inolimomab is well-tolerated and effective for severe steroid-resistant aGvHD. The optimum regimen remains to be defined.

The balance of arginine metabolism via nitric oxide synthase (NOS) or arginase is an important determinant of the inflammatory response of murine macrophages and dendritic cells. Here we analyzed the expression of the isoform arginase I in human myeloid cells. Using healthy donors and patients with arginase I deficiency, we found that in human leukocytes arginase I is constitutively expressed only in granulocytes and is not modulated by a variety of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory stimuli in vitro. We demonstrate that arginase I is localized in azurophil granules of neutrophils and constitutes a novel antimicrobial effector pathway, likely through arginine depletion in the phagolysosome. Our findings demonstrate important differences between murine and human leukocytes with respect to regulation and function of arginine metabolism via arginase.

The optimal stem cell source for stem cell gene therapy has not been defined. Most gene transfer studies have used peripheral blood or marrow repopulating cells collected after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor (G-CSF/SCF). For clinical applications, however, growth factor administration may not be feasible. Thus, in the current study we used a competitive repopulation assay in the dog to directly compare transduction efficiency of steady-state marrow, G-CSF/SCF-primed marrow, and G-CSF/SCF-mobilized peripheral blood. Cells from all three sources were transduced, cryopreserved, and thawed together before infusion into myeloablated dogs. Gene marking in hematopoietic repopulating cells was assessed by polymerase chain reaction. While primed marrow resulted in the highest long-term marking levels, steady-state marrow was transduced at least as efficiently as mobilized peripheral blood in all three dogs. These results suggest that steady-state marrow may be an appropriate source for genetic modification of hematopoietic stem cells.

Despite prophylaxis with immunosuppressive drugs, severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. T cell depletion of the graft has decreased incidence and severity of GVHD but has resulted in a higher incidence of graft failure and relapse. To reduce the risk of severe GVHD, but at the same time to maintain the graft-versus-tumor effect, we administered a fixed low number of 1 x 10(5) donor T cells per kilogram of body weight to recipients of CD34(+) cell-enriched allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) were then given in incremental doses when mixed chimerism persisted or signs of relapse occurred. A total of 23 patients receiving allografts from related and unrelated donors were treated according to this protocol after myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning. One patient did not engraft and 3/20 evaluable patients developed acute (a) GVHD > or = grade II, with a corresponding estimated cumulative incidence of 15.6% (95% CI 0-30.5%). DLI (n = 13) induced aGVHD > or = II in 6 patients, but the severity of the syndrome was reduced. Overall GVHD-related mortality was low (13%). The probability of disease-free survival and overall survival at 2 years was 0.40 (95% CI 0.21-0.75) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.21-0.63). Progression-free survival and overall survival was significantly better in patients with acute or chronic myelogenous leukemia compared to patients with lymphoproliferative disorders (p = 0.002; p = 0.02). We conclude that the combination of allografts with a T cell content of about 1 x 10(5)/kg and escalating doses of DLI is a viable transplant strategy in patients with myeloid leukemias, which results in stable engraftment and a reduction of mortality from aGVHD.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) provides a new curative treatment option for patients usually not eligible for allogeneic SCT. Because the majority of patients lack HLA-identical sibling donors (SD), unrelated donor (UD) transplantation is performed increasingly. In this retrospective analysis, we have reviewed our experience with reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, comparing related and unrelated donors. From November, 1997, to February, 2002, 51 patients with hematological malignancies received allogeneic SCT after various RIC regimens. A total of 31 had a related donor, and the remaining 20 had an unrelated donor (UD). Both groups were comparable with respect to age and gender. We observed a trend toward higher rate of graft failure in the unrelated donor group with 11% compared to 3% in the related donor group (p = 0.55). The rate of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) II-IV was 36% in the RD group versus 44% for the UD group; severe GVHD III-IV occurred in 26% and 22%, respectively. There were more serious infections in the unrelated donor group with 25% compared to 16%. Transplant-related mortality was 13% (RD group) versus 30% (UD group). At 21 months, progression-free survival was 30% in both groups. The Kaplan Meier estimate of overall survival was 40% (RD) and 30% (UD group). In summary, we found no statistically significant difference regarding progression free and overall survival, despite a trend for more graft failure and increased transplant-related complications associated with the use of stem cells from unrelated donors.

We analyzed effects of successive changes in prevention and treatment of chronic GVHD in 405 patients with aplastic anemia and refractory anemia given HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from 1970-1997. For analysis, patients were divided into group I, transplantations from 1970-1976; group II, 1977-1983; group III, 1984-1990; and group IV, 1991-1997. The overall incidence of chronic GVHD was 28%. Incidences of chronic GVHD for groups I through IV were 20%, 46%, 41%, and 22%, respectively, reflecting added buffy coat infusions in groups II and III. Five-year survival rates of patients with chronic GVHD for groups I through IV were 58%, 74%, 82%, and 76%, respectively (NS). Among group I patients, 50% were alive off immunosuppression, none were alive on immunosuppression, and 50% died. These figures were 76%, 0%, and 24% in group II; 80%, 10%, and 10% in group III; and 64%, 21%, and 14% in group IV patients. More serious infections and skin contractures were seen in group I than in groups II, III, and IV (P = .0001, .02, .01 and P =.0003, .001, .05, respectively). Lung complications, aseptic necroses, depression, and Karnofsky scores were comparable among groups. Gastrointestinal complications seemed less frequent among groups II through IV. Diabetes mellitus was more frequent in group IV than in groups I through III (P = .008). Secondary malignancies occurred in 33%, 6%, 3%, and 0% of patients in the 4 groups, respectively. In conclusion, over 28 years, chronic GVHD has remained challenging, with only slight improvements in quality of life. Decisive improvements in therapy and survival will have to await both a better understanding of the immunological events underlying chronic GVHD and better infection prevention and control.