Search

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has emerged as a promising intervention for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation with complex valve morphology. This consensus document provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of orthotopic TTVR, focusing on patient selection, procedural details, and follow-up care. Clinical outcomes from initial studies and compassionate use cases are discussed, highlighting the effectiveness of TTVR in reducing tricuspid regurgitation, inducing reverse right ventricular remodeling, and enhancing patients' quality of life. This review paper also addresses potential complications and challenges associated with TTVR, such as new-onset conduction disturbances, bleeding complications, and afterload mismatch, and provides expert recommendations for the periprocedural management, anticoagulation strategies, and long-term follow-up. With the commercial approval of the first TTVR system in the United States and Europe, it intends to serve as a reference for clinicians and researchers involved in the evolving field of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Hausleiter has received research support and speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Stolz has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lurz has received institutional fees and research grants from Abbott Cardiovascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Rudolph has received research support and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; and is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Estevez-Loureiro is a consultant for and has received fees form Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Venus Medtech, and Jenscare. Dr Davidson has received institutional research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular; and is an uncompensated advisor to Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Zahr has received grant support/research support from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; and has received consultant fees/honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr Kodali has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott; has received consulting fees from Abbott, Admedus, and Meril Lifesciences; and has equity options from Biotrace Medical and Thubrikar Aortic Valve Inc. Dr Makkar has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; has served as national principal investigator for Portico (Abbott) and Acurate (Boston Scientific) US investigation device exemption trials; has received personal proctoring fees from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received travel support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. Dr Cheung is a member of the eligibility Committee of the TRINITY CE Trial; and is a consultant for Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Jenscare. Dr Lopes has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, and Pfizer; and has received consulting fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Merck, Pfizer, and Portola. Dr Maisano has received grant or research institutional support from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, NVT, Terumo, and Venus; has received consulting fees and honoraria (both personal and institutional) from Abbott, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Mtex, Occlufit, Simulands, Squadra, Valgen, Venus, and Xeltis; has received royalty income from Edwards Lifesciences; and is shareholder (including share options) of 4Tech, Magenta, and Transseptal Solutions. Dr Fam is a consultant to Edwards, Abbott, Medtronic, and Venus Medtech. Dr Latib has served on the advisory board for Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Shifamed dyne, Philips, and NeoChord Inc. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, CorFlow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse, Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson and Johnson, MedAlliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Miracor Medical, MonarQ, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an advisory board member and/or a member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave, with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Praz has received a research grant to the institution from Abbott Vascular; and has been compensated for travel expenses by Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medira, Siemens Healthineers, and InQB8 Medical Technologies. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reducing mitral regurgitation (MR) during mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) may come at the cost of increased mitral valve gradient (MVG). The combined impact of residual MR and MVG on clinical outcomes after M-TEER is unknown., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the impact of postprocedure MR and MVG on clinical outcomes after M-TEER., Methods: EXPANDed is a pooled, patient-level cohort of the EXPAND (A Contemporary, Prospective Study Evaluating Real-world Experience of Performance and Safety for the Next Generation of MitraClip Devices) and EXPAND G4 studies, which were designed to evaluate real-world safety and effectiveness of the third- and fourth-generation MitraClip TEER Systems. Subjects were categorized by echocardiographic core laboratory (ECL) assessments into 4 groups according to 30-day MR grade and mean MVG: 1) MR ≤1+/MVG <5 mm Hg; 2) MR ≤1+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg; 3) MR ≥2+/MVG <5 mm Hg; and 4) MR ≥2+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg., Results: A total of 1,723 subjects had evaluable echocardiograms at 30 days: 72% had MR ≤1+/MVG <5 mm Hg, 18% had MR ≤1+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg, 7% had MR ≥2+/MVG <5 mm Hg, and 3% had MR ≥2+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg. MR≤1+ was sustained through 1 year in 93% of patients who achieved 30-day MR≤1+. MVG decreased from 30 days to 1 year in subjects with MVG ≥5 mm Hg (6.7 ± 4.0 to 5.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg MR ≤1+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg and 6.5 ± 1.5 to 5.5 ± 1.7 mm Hg MR ≥2+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg). One-year rates of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were lower for subjects who achieved MR ≤1+ at 30 days, regardless of MVG., Conclusions: Reduction of MR to mild or less after M-TEER with the latest-generation MitraClip systems was associated with clinical benefit regardless of MVG., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The EXPAND (NCT03502811) and EXPAND G4 (NCT04177394) studies were funded and sponsored by Abbott. Dr Singh has received consulting fees and honoraria from Abbott. Dr Price has received consulting fees and honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, InnovHeart, Medtronic, Philips Medical, W.L. Gore & Associates, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Shuvy has served as a clinical proctor for Abbott. Dr Rogers has received consulting fees from Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific. Dr Bedogni is a consultant and proctor for Abbott, Medtronic, BSCI, and Meril. Dr Asch's work as an academic core laboratory director is performed through institutional research grants (MedStar Health) with Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic Edwards Lifesciences, Neovasc, Ancora Heart, LivaNova, MVRx, InnovHeart, Polares Medical, and Aria CV. Dr Dong and Peterman are employees of Abbott. Dr Rodriguez has received grants and support for research from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, AtriCure, and CardioMech; and received honoraria or consulting fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips, Teleflex, and CardioMech. Dr Kar is a consultant to Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Peija Medical, and V-Wave, and has received research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, V-Wave, HighLife, Pi-Cardia, Laminar, and Cardiomech. Dr von Bardeleben has performed non-paid trial activities for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and the University of Göttingen (IIT); and served on the advisory board or Speakers Bureau for Abbott Cardiovascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and NeoChord. Dr Maisano has received grants and/or institutional research support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, and Terumo; has received honoraria and consulting fees (personal and institutional) from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Xeltis, and CardioValve; has received royalty income and intellectual property rights from Edwards Lifesciences, and is a shareholder (including stock options) of CardioGard, Magenta, SwissVortex, Transseptal Solutions, Occlufit, 4Tech, and Perifect. All other authors authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased mortality rates, but benefit of its correction and ideal timing are not clearly determined. This study aimed to identify patient subsets who might benefit from the surgery., Methods: In TRIGISTRY, an international cohort study of consecutive patients with severe isolated functional tricuspid regurgitation (33 centres, 10 countries), survival rates up to 10 years were compared between patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (repair or replacement) and those conservatively managed, overall and according to TRI-SCORE category (low: ≤3, intermediate: 4-5, and high: ≥6)., Results: One thousand and two hundred seventeen were managed conservatively, and 551 underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (200 repairs and 351 replacements). TRI-SCORE distribution was 33% low, 32% intermediate, and 35% high. At 10 years, survival rates were similar between surgical and conservative management [41% vs. 36%; hazard ratio (HR) .97; 95% confidence interval (CI) .88-1.08, P = .57]. Surgery improved survival compared with conservative management in the low TRI-SCORE category (72% vs. 44%; HR .27; 95% CI .20-.37, P < .0001), but not in the intermediate (36% vs. 37%; HR 1.17; 95%CI .98-1.40, P = .09) or high categories (20% vs. 24%; HR 1.06; 95% CI .91-1.25, P = .45). Both repair and replacement improved survival in the low TRI-SCORE category (84% and 61% vs. 44%; HR .11; 95% CI .06-.19, P < .0001, and HR .65; 95% CI .47-.90, P = .009). Repair showed benefit in the intermediate category (59% vs. 37%; HR .49; 95% CI .35-.68, P < .0001) while replacement was possibly harmful (25% vs. 37%; HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.18-1.72, P = .0002)., Conclusions: Higher survival rates were observed with repair than replacement and benefit of intervention declined as TRI-SCORE increased with no benefit of any type of surgery in the high TRI-SCORE category. These results emphasize the importance of timely intervention and patient selection to achieve the best outcomes and the need for randomized controlled trials., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To assess the incremental prognostic value of right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain over conventional risk scores in predicting the peri-operative mortality in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery., Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 110 consecutive patients with severe TR who underwent isolated TV surgery between November 2016 and July 2022 at San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. Exclusion criteria were previous TV surgery, urgent surgery, complex congenital heart disease, active endocarditis and inadequate acoustic window. Baseline clinical data were included, as well as laboratory tests and clinical risk score, as TRI-SCORE and MELD-XI. The clinical outcome was peri-operative mortality, defined as all-cause mortality within 30 days., Results: The final cohort included 79 patients. The end-point occurred in 7 patients (9%), who died within 30 days after isolated TV surgery. Receiver operator characteristic curves analysis showed that, among parameters of right ventricular function, right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain was the best parameter to predict peri-operative mortality (AUC: 0.854, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, P = 0.005, sensitivity 68%, specificity 100%). At univariable analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum sodium, MELD-XI, TRI-SCORE, right ventricular areas, right ventricular global longitudinal strain, right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain, fractional area change and the ratio between right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain/pulmonary arterial systolic pressure were significantly associated with the end-point. The combination of TRI-SCORE and right ventricular Strain, evaluating right ventricular systolic function with speckle-tracking echocardiography, outperformed classic TRI-SCORE in outcome prediction (AUC 0.874 vs 0.787, P = 0.05)., Conclusions: Right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain has an incremental prognostic value over conventional parameters and significantly improves the ability of clinical scores to predict peri-operative mortality in patients undergoing isolated TV surgery., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Background: Despite its wide diffusion in surgical procedures, very few experiences are reported so far about the possible applications of remote proctoring (RP) in structural heart interventions., Aims: Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of RP during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using a mixed reality-based head-mounted display (HMD)., Methods: Two users (a doctor and a proctor), wearing HMDs, were connected through a 5G network, allowing them to share audio and video signals. During the procedure, the proctor was located in a contiguous room, without any direct connection with the operator. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of HMD-mediated interaction if compared with direct in-person interaction. It was assessed using an operator-proctor interaction test based on six questions asked by the doctor to the proctor on six key procedural steps., Results: Between September 2021 and April 2022, nine patients were enrolled in the study (15 clips delivered). The primary endpoint was reached in 9/15 clips implanted (60%). The first three failures were due to a chat software problem, and the others were linked with a 5G network malfunction. However, the HMD and its mixed reality tools were well tolerated by the operators, and no interference with the procedure was registered in any of the cases., Conclusions: In our experience, RP during structural heart interventions is feasible and efficacious. Wearing the HMD is comfortable and does not affect safety and effectiveness of interventional procedures. However, especially if considering a wide geographic use of this tool, a stable internet connection is imperative., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The aim of this study was to report the long-term results of the clover and edge-to-edge repair techniques for complex tricuspid regurgitation (TR)., Methods: This was a single-center observational study. A competing risks proportional-hazards regression model, using the Fine and Gray model, was performed to analyze the time to TR ≥2+, considering death as a competing risk., Results: A total of 145 consecutive patients (57% female) with severe or moderately severe TR secondary to leaflet prolapse or flail (115 patients), tethering (27 patients), or mixed (3 patients) lesions underwent clover (110 patients) or edge-to-edge repair(35 patients). The TR origin was degenerative in 75% of cases, posttraumatic in 8%, and secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy in 17%. Ring (64%) or suture (31%) annuloplasty was performed in 95% of patients. Concomitant procedures (mainly mitral surgery) were performed in 80% of cases. Hospital death was 5.5%. Follow-up was 98% complete, and median was 15 years (interquartile range, 14-17 years). The 16-year overall survival was 56% ± 5%. Previous cardiac surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 2.83; 95% CI, 1.15-6.93; P = .023) and right ventricular dysfunction (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.01-4.95; P = .046) were identified as predictors of death. The 16-year cumulative incidence function (CIF) of cardiac death with noncardiac death as a competing risk was 19.6%, and previous cardiac surgery (HR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.23-9.65; P = .019) was detected as the only predictor of the event. At 16 years, the CIF of TR ≥2+ with death as a competing risk was 23.8%. In particular, TR ≥3+ was detected in 4 patients (3%)., Conclusions: When TR could not be treated by annuloplasty alone, concomitant leaflet repair with the clover or edge-to-edge technique effectively restored valve competence with very satisfactory long-term results and a low rate of moderate or greater TR recurrence., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Backgrounds: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is commonly evaluated at end-systole. However, a systolic-only disjunction is merely apparent and two distinct phenotypes have been identified: True-MAD (atrial displacement of the posterior leaflet in diastole and systole) and Pseudo-MAD (apparent displacement in systole only). The prevalence of True-MAD and Pseudo-MAD in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is not known. Aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of True-MAD and Pseudo-MAD in myxomatous MVP patients by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and to validate TTE compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (reference standards)., Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent TTE for MVP were included. Mitral annular phenotype was evaluated in TTE parasternal long-axis view. Accuracy (against CMR) and intra/inter rater reliability of TTE were also assessed., Results: Six-hundred-three consecutive patients were included. The prevalence of True-MAD and Pseudo-MAD was 7% (42) and 37% (221) (p<0.05), respectively. Accordingly, 221 of 263 (84%) patients classically classified as "MAD" would have been reclassified as Pseudo-MAD. Pseudo-MAD prevalence and systolic length increased with higher mitral regurgitation (MR) severity (23% for mild MR, 36% for moderate MR, 44% for severe MR (p<0.05); 6 ± 2 mm for mild MR; 8 ± 2 mm for moderate MR; 10 ± 2mm for severe MR (p<0.05), while True-MAD prevalence was consistent across MR grades. Pseudo-MAD was linked to systolic curling and Pickelhaube. TTE showed an overall accuracy of 0.89 (Cohen k 0.80), a substantial inter-rater agreement of 0.87 (k 0.76) and an almost perfect intra-rater agreement of 0.93 (k 0.85)., Conclusion: True-MAD, unlike Pseudo-MAD, is rare in patients with MVP. Pseudo-MAD is associated with the grade of MR and other echocardiographic features of advanced myxomatous degeneration. TTE is an accurate and reliable first line method to assess mitral annulus morphology in MVP., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Data regarding the association of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) are scarce., Objectives: To 1) investigate the impact of PH on outcomes after T-TEER and 2) to shed further light into the role of pre- and postcapillary PH in patients undergoing T-TEER for relevant tricuspid regurgitation (TR)., Methods: The study included patients from the EuroTR registry (NCT06307262) who underwent T-TEER for relevant TR from 2016 until 2023 with available invasive evaluation of sPAP using right heart catheterization. Study endpoints were procedural TR reduction, improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class and a combined endpoint of death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) at two-years., Results: Among a total of 1230 patients (mean age 78.6 ±7.0 years; 51.4% women) increasing systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was independently associated with increasing rates of two-year death or HFH (hazard ratio 1.027, 95% confidence interval 1.003-1.052, p=0.030; median survival follow up 343 (114-645) days). No significant survival differences were observed for patients with pre- vs. postcapillary PH. Sensitivity analysis revealed a sPAP value of 46 mmHg as optimized threshold for prediction of death or HFH. Being observed in 526 patients (42.8%), elevated sPAP > 46 mmHg was associated with more severe heart failure symptoms at baseline and follow-up. Importantly, NYHA functional class and TR severity significantly improved irrespective of PH., Conclusion: PH is an important outcome predictor in patients undergoing T-TEER for relevant TR. In contrast to previous studies, no significant differences were observed for patients with pre- and postcapillary PH in terms of survival free from HFH., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aim: The aims of this study were: i) to report the prevalence of low-risk patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) in a real-world setting; ii) to evaluate the prognostic significance of EuroSCORE II; iii) to determine whether an optimal M-TEER provides a mortality benefit regardless of EuroSCORE-II., Methods: We analyzed data from the GIOTTO registry that enrolled patients undergoing M-TEER in Italy. We included only patients with DMR. Two groups were defined: patients with EuroSCORE<4% and with EuroSCORE≥4%. A further stratification according to variables included in the EuroSCORE-II was made. Interaction between EuroSCORE-II and optimal procedural success was evaluated. Outcome of interest was all-cause death at 2-year., Results: Among 1659 patients prospectively enrolled in the GIOTTO registry, 657 had DMR, 364 with an EuroSCORE<4% (53%) and 311 with an EuroSCORE≥4% (47%). Patients with lower EuroSCORE were older with less comorbidities. All-cause mortality was higher in patients with EuroSCORE≥ vs <4%. EuroSCORE II ≥ 4% was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 2.36, 95%CI 1.28-4.38, p = 0.007). Among variables included in the EuroSCORE-II, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction<35% and systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure ≥ 50mmhg were independent predictors of clinical outcome. Two-year all-cause death was higher in patients without optimal MR reduction regardless of the calculated surgical risk (p for interaction 0.3)., Conclusion: More than half of patients with DMR undergoing M-TEER had a Euroscore<4% with a median age of 81. An optimally successful M-TEER was associated with a lower mortality regardless of EuroSCORE., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest M.A., M.M., F.B., C.G., A.G., and C.T. received consultation and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular outside the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with transcatheter devices has become a mainstay in the minimally invasive treatment of patients with severe mitral regurgitation at increased surgical risk. Despite its apparently favorable risk profile, there is uncertainty on the risk and features of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) early and long after transcatheter mitral valve repair. We aimed to appraise the incidence and predictors of CVA in patients who underwent TEER. We explicitly queried the data set of an ongoing multicenter prospective observational study dedicated to TEER with MitraClip (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California). The incidence of CVAs after TEER was formally appraised, and we explored potential predictors of such events. Descriptive, bivariate, and diagnostic accuracy analyses were performed. Of 2,238 patients who underwent TEER, CVAs occurred in 33 patients (1.47% [95% confidence interval 1.02% to 2.06%]), including 6 (0.27% [0.10% to 0.58%]) in-hospital strokes and 27 events after discharge (0.99% [0.66% to 1.44%]), over a median follow-up of 14 months. Most CVAs were major ischemic strokes during and after the in-hospital phase. Overall, CVAs were more common in patients with atrial fibrillation (p = 0.018), renal dysfunction (p = 0.032), higher EuroSCORE II (p = 0.033), and, as expected, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (p = 0.033), despite the limited prognostic accuracy of the score. Notably, the occurrence of CVA did not confer a significantly increased risk of long-term (p = 0.136) or cardiac death (p = 0.397). The incidence of CVA in patients who underwent TEER is low, with most events occurring after discharge and being associated with preexisting risk features. These findings, although reassuring on the safety of TEER, call for proactive antithrombotic therapy whenever CVA risk is increased before and after TEER., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Adamo has received speaker fees from speaker fees from Abbott Structural Heart. Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai has consulted for aleph, Amarin, Balmed, Cardionovum, Crannmedical, Endocore Lab, Eukon, Guidotti, Innovheart, Meditrial, Menarini, MicroPort, Opsens Medical, Terumo, and Translumina outside the present work. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Using three-dimensional (3D) modalities for optimal pre-procedure planning in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is critical for procedural success. However, current methods rely on visualizing images on a two-dimensional screen, using shading and colors to create the illusion of 3D, potentially impeding the accurate comprehension of the actual anatomy structures. In contrast, a new Mixed Reality (MxR) based software enables accurate 3D visualization, imaging manipulation, and quantification of measurements., Aims: The study aims to evaluate the feasibility, reproducibility, and accuracy of dimensions of the aortic valve complex as measured with a new holographic MxR software (ARTICOR®, Artiness srl, Milano, Italy) compared to a widely used software for pre-operative sizing and planning (3mensio Medical Imaging BV, Bilthoven, The Netherlands)., Methods: This retrospective, observational, double-center study enrolled 100 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent cardiac computed tomography (CCT) before TAVR. The CCT datasets of volumetric aortic valve images were analyzed using 3Mensio and newly introduced MxR-based software., Results: Ninety-eight percent of the CCT datasets were successfully converted into holographic models. A higher level of agreement between the two software systems was observed for linear metrics (short, long, and average diameter). In comparison, agreement was lower for area, perimeter, and annulus-to-coronary ostia distance measurements. Notably, the annulus area, annular perimeter, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area, and LVOT perimeter were significantly and consistently smaller with the MxR-based software compared to the 3Mensio. Excellent interobserver reliability was demonstrated for most measurements, especially for direct linear measurements., Conclusions: Linear measurements of the aortic valve complex using MxR-based software are reproducible compared to the standard CCT dataset analyzed with 3Mensio. MxR-based software could represent an accurate tool for the pre-procedural planning of TAVR., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has been increasingly adopted in recent years for the treatment of patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, no dedicated risk stratification has been established for patients undergoing TTVI., Objectives: The aim of the present study was to propose a dedicated risk score for patients affected by severe TR undergoing TTVI., Methods: The score was derived from the TRIVALVE (International Multisite Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies Registry; NCT03416166) registry, according to data availability. A stepwise model approach was used on predictor variables to develop a scoring system for predicting 12-month mortality or rehospitalization using multivariable logistic regression. Internal discrimination, calibration, and validation were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and bootstrapping with 1,000 resamples., Results: A total of 483 patients were included in the study, with an overall 12-month mortality or rehospitalization rate of 19% (n = 94). The final risk score, ranging from 0 to 4.5, included the following 5 parameters (adjusted for age and gender): 1) atrial fibrillation at baseline; 2) glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min; 3) elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase/bilirubin levels; 4) signs of right heart failure; and 5) left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. The bias-corrected area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 68% (95% CI: 62%-75%). A cutoff value of 2.5 demonstrated sensitivity of 65.4% and specificity of 60.5% for the outcome., Conclusions: The present study proposes a dedicated risk score for patients undergoing TTVI, providing an additional and simple tool for heart teams to select the best therapy for patients affected by severe TR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Russo has received a fellowship training grant from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Adamo has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and Novartis. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; has stock options with NaviGate; and is chief scientific officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Andreas is a proctor, consultant, and speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Zoll; and has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI Solutions. Dr Denti has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Estevez-Loureiro is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Nickenig has received honoraria for lectures or advisory board membership from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Schofer is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sievert has received study honoraria to the institution, travel expenses, and consulting fees from 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Adona Medical, Akura Medical, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Axon, Bavaria Medizin Technologie, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiac Success, Cardimed, Cardionovum, CeloNova Biosciences, Contego, Coramaze, CroíValve, CSL Behring, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards Lifesciences, EndoBar, Endologix, EndoMatic, Esperion Therapeutics, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, InterShunt Technologies, Intervene, K2, Laminar, Life Tech Care, Magenta, Maquet Getinge Group, Metavention, Mitralix, Mokita, Neurotronic, NXT Biomedical, Occlutech, Recor, Renal Guard, Shifamed, Terumo, Trisol, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, Vivasure Medical, Vvital Biomed, and WhiteSwell. Dr Tang has served as a physician proctor for Medtronic; has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott Structural Heart, and NeoChord; has served on the transcatheter aortic valve replacement advisory board for Abbott Structural Heart; and has served on the physician advisory board for JenaValve. Dr von Bardeleben has served for trials and as a principal investigator for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Cardiovalve, CorFlow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an advisory board member and/or a member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis, with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry, without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Enriquez-Sarano is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, ChemImage, Cryolife, and HighLife. Dr Maisano is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Perifect, Xeltis, Transseptal Solutions, Magenta, and Cardiovalve; has received grant support from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, and Terumo; has received royalties from Edwards Lifesciences and 4Tech; and is a cofounder and shareholder of Transseptal Solutions, 4Tech, Cardiovalve, Magenta, Perifect, Coregard and SwissVortex. Dr Taramasso has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, 4Tech, Boston Scientific, CoreMedic, Mitraltech, and SwissVortex (outside the submitted work). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Moderate secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) represents a subgroup of heart failure (HF) patients with treatment restricted to medical therapy. Outcomes in patients with moderate SMR treated with mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) are less well known., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of M-TEER in subjects with moderate SMR using the EXPANDed studies., Methods: One-year outcomes in subjects from the EXPANDed studies (EXPAND [A Contemporary, Prospective Study Evaluating Real-world Experience of Performance and Safety for the Next Generation of MitraClip Devices] and EXPAND G4 [A Post-Market Study Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the MitraClip G4 System] MitraClip studies) with baseline moderate SMR (2+), per echocardiographic core laboratory (ECL) assessment, were compared with subjects with baseline severe SMR (≥3+)., Results: There were 335 subjects with moderate SMR and 525 with severe SMR at baseline per ECL review. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 subgroups. After treatment with M-TEER, significant MR reduction was achieved in both groups. Significant left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling was observed through 1 year, with a >20 mL decrease in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes on average in the moderate SMR group. Significant 1-year improvements in NYHA functional class (>78% NYHA functional class I or II) and quality of life (>20 points on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary) were observed in subjects with moderate SMR. Similarly, low rates of major adverse events, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalizations were observed between the 2 subgroups through 1 year., Conclusions: In the EXPANDed studies, subjects with moderate SMR treated with M-TEER had improvements similar to subjects with severe SMR in quality of life and positive LV remodeling at 1 year. Future studies are needed to evaluate if M-TEER would be beneficial for HF patients with moderate SMR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The EXPAND (NCT03502811) and EXPAND G4 (NCT04177394) studies were funded and sponsored by Abbott. Dr Asgar is a consultant to Abbott Structural Heart, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, W.L. Gore, and Anteris Technologies. Dr Tang has received speaker honoraria and served as a physician proctor, consultant, advisory board member, TAVR publications committee member, APOLLO trial screening committee member, and IMPACT MR steering committee member for Medtronic; has received speaker honoraria and served as a physician proctor, consultant, advisory board member, and TRILUMINATE trial anatomic eligibility and publications committee member for Abbott Structural Heart; has served as an advisory board member for Boston Scientific and JenaValve; has served as a consultant and physician screening committee member for Shockwave Medical; has served as a consultant for NeoChord, Peija Medical, and Shenqi Medical Technology; and has received speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthineers. Dr Rogers is a consultant to Abbott Structural Heart, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific. Dr Rottbauer has received consulting fees/speaker honoraria from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; and is a member of the steering committee of the EXPAND G4 study for Abbott and Encourage AF study for Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Morse is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Denti has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; and has been a consultant to InnovHeart, Artiness, and Pi-Cardia. Dr Mahoney is a consultant and proctor for Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific; is a consultant for Abbott; and has been awarded research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic Abbott, and Boston Scientific. Dr Rinaldi has been awarded honoraria and/or consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Asch’s work as an academic core laboratory director is performed through institutional research grants (MedStar Health) with Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Neovasc, Ancora Heart, LivaNova, MVRx, InnovHeart, Polares Medical, and Aria CV. Dr Zamorano has received speaker honoraria from Pfizer, Amgen, and Daiichi Sankyo; and research grants from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Dong and Ms Huang are employees of Abbott Structural Heart. Dr Lindenfeld has been a consultant for Abbott, Alleviant, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CVRx, Edwards Lifesciences, Merck, Medtronic, V-Wave, Vascular Dynamics, WhiteSwell, and Vectorious; and receives research funding from AstraZeneca. Dr Maisano has received grants and/or institutional research support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, and Terumo; has received honoraria and consulting fees (personal and institutional) from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Xeltis, and Cardiovalve; has received royalty income and intellectual property rights from Edwards Lifesciences; and is a shareholder (including stock options) of CardioGard, Magenta, SwissVortex, Transseptal Solutions, Occlufit, 4Tech, and Perifect. Dr von Bardeleben has performed nonpaid trial activities for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and the University of Göttingen (IIT); and serves as an advisory board or speaker bureau member for Abbott Cardiovascular Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and NeoChord. Dr Kar has received grants and institutional research support from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences; has received consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, W.L. Gore, and Medtronic; served as a steering committee member of the TRILUMINATE study (Abbott) and as national principal investigator of the EXPAND study and the REPAIR MR study for Abbott. Dr Rodriguez has been awarded grants and support for research from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, AtriCure, and CardioMech; and has received honoraria or consulting fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips, Teleflex, and CardioMech., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) are increasingly used to treat patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR). The evolution of concurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) severity after TTVI is currently unknown and may be pivotal for clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to assess the evolution of MR after TTVI and to identify predictors of MR worsening and improvement., Methods and Results: This analysis is a substudy of the Trivalve Registry, an international registry designed to collect data on TTVI. This substudy included all patients with echocardiographic data on MR evolution and excluded those with a concomitant tricuspid and mitral transcatheter valve intervention or with a history of mitral valve intervention. The co-primary outcomes were MR improvement and worsening at two timepoints: pre-discharge and 2-month follow-up. This analysis included 359 patients with severe TR, mostly(80%) treated with tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair(T-TEER). MR improvement was found in 106(29.5%) and 99(34%) patients, while MR worsening in 34(9.5%) and 33(11%) patients at pre-discharge and 2-month follow-up, respectively. Annuloplasty and heterotopic replacement were associated with MR worsening. Independent predictors of MR improvement were: atrial fibrillation, T-TEER, acute procedural success, TR reduction, LVEDD>60 mm and beta-blocker therapy. Patients with moderate-to-severe/severe MR following TTVI showed significantly higher death rates., Conclusion: MR degree variation is common after TTVI, with most cases showing improvement. Clinical and procedural characteristics may predict the MR evolution, in particular procedural success and T-TEER play key roles in MR outcomes. TTVI may be beneficial even in the presence of functional MR., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: The prevalence, the etiologies and the clinical features of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the context of concomitant degenerative mitral valve (MV) disease are poorly defined. This paper aims to assess the prevalence, determinants and clinical consequences of TR in severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR)., Methods and Results: Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were collected among patients with severe DMR. 884 patients were included in our study, 31% with > moderate TR. Tricuspid valve prolapse (TVP) was the most common etiology (487 patients, 55%), followed by atrial functional TR (AFTR, 172 patients, 19%) and ventricular functional TR (VFTR, 42 patients, 5%), while TR etiology was mixed in 183 (21%) patients. Patients with TVP were younger, had better clinical presentation, had few comorbidities, and had less hemodynamically relevant TR. VFTR patients were characterized by older age, worst clinical presentation and both highest comorbidity rate and prevalence of >mild TR. AFTR group showed an intermediate profile of clinical presentation and comorbidities and the largest tricuspid annulus (TA) diameter.MV surgery was performed in 785 (88%) patients; 132 (15%) underwent simultaneous TV intervention, more often AFTR patients (32%). TA dilatation (OR 3.68, CI 2.05-6.62, p <0.001) and >mild TR (OR 9.30, CI 5.10-16.95, p<0.001) were independently associated with TV intervention., Conclusions: In patients with severe DMR, TR presents with different etiologies, clinical features and echocardiographic phenotypes that require a comprehensive assessment at the time of DMR surgery to ensure the best management for these patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality. Though most often isolated, BAV may be associated with other cardiovascular malformations. BAV-related aortopathy is the most common, sharing genetic alterations and phenotypic heterogeneity characteristics. Sometimes silent for a lifetime, BAV may manifest as aortic valve dysfunction, aortic aneurysm, or more emergent situations, such as endocarditis or aortic dissection. Its embryological origin and the characterization of the genes involved, as well as the histopathological and hemodynamic aspects of its natural history, are becoming increasingly clear. In addition, emerging evidence of rhythm disorders associated with BAV has been identified. A new international nomenclature and classification has been introduced to interpret all the advances made in recent years for the comprehension of this condition. In the guidelines, more attention has been paid to the diagnosis of BAV and related aortopathy, together with surveillance, and family screening. Surgical treatment remains the gold standard, especially in young low-risk patients, and valve repair techniques have been shown to be effective and durable. Finally, the new era of transcatheter techniques is also being applied to dysfunctional BAV, allowing the treatment of patients at high surgical risk, with increasingly promising results, and the possibility of expanding indications through the introduction of more advanced devices. This review aims to comprehensively describe the BAV conundrum, focusing on anatomy, pathophysiology, genetics, diagnosis of BAV-related disorders, and the different treatment options available in the transcatheter era., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Francesco Maisano received a grant and/or institutional research support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific Corporation, NVT, Terumo. He received consulting fees, Honoraria personal and institutional from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Xeltis, Cardiovalve, Occlufit, Simulands, Mtex. He has received royalty income/IP rights from Edwards Lifesciences. He is a shareholder (including share options) of Cardiogard, Magenta, SwissVortex, Transseptal Solutions, Occlufit, 4Tech, Perifect., (Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Aims: Data on the prognostic impact of residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) are scarce. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate 2-year survival and symptomatic outcomes of patients in relation to residual TR after T-TEER., Methods and Results: Using the large European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Tricuspid Regurgitation (EuroTR registry) we investigated the impact of residual TR on 2-year all-cause mortality and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at follow-up. The study further identified predictors for residual TR ≥3+ using a logistic regression model. The study included a total of 1286 T-TEER patients (mean age 78.0 ± 8.9 years, 53.6% female). TR was successfully reduced to ≤1+ in 42.4%, 2+ in 40.0% and 3+ in 14.9% of patients at discharge, while 2.8% remained with TR ≥4+ after the procedure. Residual TR ≥3+ was an independent multivariable predictor of 2-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.30-3.26, p = 0.002). The prevalence of residual TR ≥3+ was four times higher in patients with higher baseline TR (vena contracta >11.1 mm) and more severe tricuspid valve tenting (tenting area >1.92 cm 2 ). Of note, no survival difference was observed in patients with residual TR ≤1+ versus 2+ (76.2% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.461). The rate of NYHA functional class ≥III at follow-up was significantly higher in patients with residual TR ≥3+ (52.4% vs. 40.5%, p < 0.001). Of note, the degree of TR reduction significantly correlated with the extent of symptomatic improvement (p = 0.012)., Conclusions: T-TEER effectively reduced TR severity in the majority of patients. While residual TR ≥3+ was associated with worse outcomes, no differences were observed for residual TR 1+ versus 2+. Symptomatic improvement correlated with the degree of TR reduction., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Nowadays, the long-life management of patients with aortic stenosis has emerged as one of the most debated issues. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is more frequently performed in younger patients with lower surgical risk, and also the number of valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures has increased in the last few years. However, coronary obstruction is the most dreadful complication related to this procedure. To prevent coronary obstruction in the context of transcatheter aortic ViV implantation, the BASILICA (bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction) technique was developed. Although effective, BASILICA is complex and time-consuming. Hence, simpler, reproducible, and faster strategies are desirable. Here we present a promising simplified BASILICA technique employing an Armada Balloon to perform the leaflet laceration., (© 2024 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The COAPT Trial was the first ever to demonstrate a survival benefit in treating functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). That was achieved through transcatheter mitral repair in selected patients. The exact proportion of patients fulfilling COAPT selection criteria in the real-world is unknown., Aims: To assess the applicability of COAPT criteria in real world and its impact on patients' survival., Methods: We assessed the clinical data and follow-up results of all consecutive patients admitted for FMR at our Department between January 2016 and May 2021 according to COAPT eligibility. COAPT eligibility was retrospectively assessed by a cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist., Results: Among 394 patients, 56 (14%) were COAPT eligible. The most frequent reasons for exclusion were MR ≤ 2 (22%), LVEF < 20% or >50% (19%), and non-optimized GDMT (21.3%). Among Non-COAPT patients, weighted 4-year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% confidence interval [CI: 0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [CI: 0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027)., Conclusions: Only a minority (14%) of real-world patients with FMR referred to a tertiary hospital fulfilled the COAPT selection criteria. Among Non-COAPT patients, weighted 4-year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% [0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027)., (© 2024 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: To assess the interaction between heart failure (HF) severity and optimal reduction of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) on mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER)., Methods and Results: Among 1656 patients included in the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GIse) registry Of Transcatheter treatment of mitral valve regurgitaTiOn (GIOTTO) 984 had SMR and complete data on advanced HF. Advanced HF was defined as NYHA class III or IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and > 1 HF hospitalization during the last 12 months. Optimal M-TEER was defined as residual SMR ≤ 1 + at discharge. One hundred sixteen patients (11.8%) had advanced HF. Achievement of an optimal SMR reduction was similar in patients with and without advanced HF (65% and 60% respectively). Advanced HF was an independent predictor of 2-year all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.10). Optimal M-TEER, as compared to a no-optimal M-TEER, was associated with a reduced risk of death both in patients with advanced (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; p = 0.039) and no-advanced HF (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.78; p < 0.001; p = 0.778 for interaction)., Conclusions: Advanced HF is associated with poor outcome in patients undergoing M-TEER. However, an optimal SMR reduction reduces the risk of 2-year mortality regardless of HF severity., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: We aimed to assess the characteristics, management and long-term prognosis of a cohort of patients with multiple valvular disease, focusing on the context of severe mitral or aortic disease with concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR)., Methods: After using a propensity score matching for age, 975 patients with ≥ moderate TR, diagnosed at our centers from 2012 to 2020, were included and divided in four groups, including isolated TR patients as reference group. Primary endpoint was all-cause death (ACD), secondary endpoint was the composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization + any valvular intervention., Results: Patients with isolated TR (356, 37 %) had more history of atrial fibrillation and were more often asymptomatic and with preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) + TR (466, 48 %) showed higher rates of concomitant coronary artery disease, advanced functional class symptoms and larger left atrial volumes. Severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients (131, 13 %) were older, with more comorbidities and lower LVEF. Patients with severe aortic regurgitation and TR (22, 2 %) were younger, with larger LV dimensions and higher pulmonary arterial pressures.After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, both endpoints were univariably more frequent in patients with severe AS + TR (all p < 0.001), but after comprehensive adjustment difference in the primary endpoint became insignificant, underscoring the serious outcomes of all significant TR groups significantly. Overall, in 44 (5 %) patients tricuspid intervention was performed, with no differences between groups in term of frequency of concomitant or staged tricuspid valve surgical treatment., Conclusions: In the context of severe left-sided VD, concomitant significant TR is common, and each subtype presents with different clinical and echocardiographic features: patients with severe AS and TR have considerable worse prognosis, although comprehensive adjustment reflected the poor outcomes affecting all types of patients with significant TR. In this scenario, TR was profoundly undertreated., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequent in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Although primary MR is an established negative prognostic factor, whether different mechanisms of MR have different effects on outcome is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the MR mechanism in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Methods and Results: This is a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis in a high-volume tertiary care center. Echocardiographic comprehensive MR assessment was performed at baseline and within 3 months post TAVR. The study population was divided into 4 groups according to MR mechanism: Group I: fibro-calcific leaflet degeneration; Group II: prolapse/flail; Group III: ventricular secondary MR (functional MR); and Group IV: atrial functional MR. The study end point was a combination of death from cardiovascular cause and heart failure-related hospitalization. The study population included 427 patients (mean age 81.7±6.5 years; 71% primary MR; 62% ≥moderate MR). At 3-year follow-up, survival free from the composite end point significantly differs according to MR mechanism: it was higher in group IV (atrial functional MR, 96.6%) compared with group I (80.4%, P =0.002) and group II patients (60.7%, P =0.001), and group III (84.8%, P =0.037); patients with MR due to leaflet prolapse showed poorer prognosis compared with patients with functional MR (group III, P =0.023 and group IV, P =0.001) and with group I ( P =0.040). Overall, severe MR after TAVR identified patients with poorer prognosis and was significantly more frequent in group II (46.4%, P =0.001)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing TAVR, preprocedural identification of MR mechanism and mechanism provides prognostic insights.

Background: Severe pure aortic regurgitation (AR) carries a high mortality and morbidity risk, and it is often undertreated because of the inherent surgical risk. Transcatheter heart valves (THVs) have been used off-label in this setting with overall suboptimal results. The dedicated "purpose-built" Jena Valve Trilogy (JVT, JenaValve Technology) showed an encouraging performance, although it has never been compared to other THVs., Objectives: The aim of our study was to assess the performance of the latest iteration of THVs used off-label in comparison to the purpose-built JVT in inoperable patients with severe AR., Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective registry with 18 participating centers worldwide collecting data on inoperable patients with severe AR of the native valve. A bicuspid aortic valve was the main exclusion criterion. The primary endpoints were technical and device success, 1-year all-cause mortality, and the composite of 1-year mortality and the heart failure rehospitalization rate., Results: Overall, 256 patients were enrolled. THVs used off-label were used in 168 cases (66%), whereas JVT was used in 88 (34%). JVT had higher technical (81% vs 98%; P < 0.001) and device success rates (73% vs 95%; P < 0.001), primarily driven by significantly lower incidences of THV embolization (15% vs 1.1%; P < 0.001), the need for a second valve (11% vs 1.1%; P = 0.004), and moderate residual AR (10% vs 1.1%; P = 0.007). The permanent pacemaker implantation rate was comparable and elevated for both groups (22% vs 24%; P = 0.70). Finally, no significant difference was observed at the 1-year follow-up in terms of mortality (HR: 0.99; P = 0.980) and the composite endpoint (HR: 1.5; P = 0.355)., Conclusions: The JVT platform has a better acute performance than other THVs when used off-label for inoperable patients with severe AR. A longer follow-up is conceivably needed to detect a possible impact on prognosis., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study has been performed at IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, a clinical research hospital partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. Dr Adam has received grants and personal fees from Medtronic; and has received personal fees from JenaValve, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific. Dr Wienemann has received travel grants from JenaValve. Dr Panoulas has received consultancy fees for Medtronic; and has served as a proctor for Medtronic. Dr Taramasso has received consultancy fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifescience, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Shenqi Medical, PiCardia, CoreMedic, CoreQuest, MEDIRA, Simulands, and VentriMend; and serves on the Advisory Boards for Abbott and HiD Imaging. Dr Baldus has received lecture fees from JenaValve; and has received lecture and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Baumbach has received speaker/consultant fees from Medtronic, Biotronik, Meril, Sinomed, and Microport; and is a proctor for JenaValve. Dr Rudolph has received consultancy fees/speaker honoraria from Abbott, JenaValve, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Testa is a proctor/consultant for Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Meril; and has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Meril., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: This analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes associated with heart failure (HF) readmissions and to identify associations with HF hospitalizations (HFH) in patients treated with the MitraClip™ NTR/XTR System in the EXPAND study., Methods and Results: The global, real-world EXPAND study enrolled 1041 patients with primary or secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) treated with the MitraClip NTR/XTR System. Echocardiograms were analysed by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory. The study population was stratified into HFH and No-HFH groups based on the occurrence of HFH 1 year post-index procedure. Clinical outcomes including MR severity, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, and all-cause mortality were compared (HFH: n = 181; No-HFH: n = 860). Both groups achieved consistent 1-year MR reduction to ≤1+ (HFH vs. No-HFH: 87.3% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.6) and significant 1-year improvement in KCCQ scores (+16.5 vs. +22.3, p = 0.09) and NYHA functional class. However, more patients in the No-HFH group had 1-year NYHA class ≤II (HFH vs. No-HFH: 67.9% vs. 81.9%, p < 0.01). All-cause mortality at 1 year was 36.8% in the HFH group versus 10.4% in the No-HFH group (p < 0.001). The HFH rate decreased by 63% at 1 year post-M-TEER versus 1 year pre-treatment (relative risk 0.4, p < 0.001). Independent HFH associations were MR ≥2+ at discharge, HFH 1 year prior to treatment, baseline NYHA class ≥III, baseline tricuspid regurgitation ≥2+, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%., Conclusions: This study reports the impact of HFH on clinical outcomes post-treatment in the EXPAND study. Results demonstrate that the occurrence of HFH was associated with worse 1-year survival, and treatment with the MitraClip system substantially reduced HFH and improved patient symptoms and quality of life., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Some patients affected by mitral valve (MV) prolapse (MVP) are at higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), but the underlying pathogenesis, as well as the effects of surgery on VA, remain not fully understood. Mitral valve repair, however, represents a privileged point of view to deepen the understanding of arrhythmogenesis in this context. Hence, we report an interesting case of MV re-repair., Case Summary: A 52-year-old man was referred to our institution for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) due to P2 prolapse in the context of myxomatous MV degeneration. Pre-operative imaging showed systolic mitral annular disjunction, left ventricular (LV) wall curling, Pickelhaube's sign, and a prolapsing tricuspid valve (TV) with only mild regurgitation. Twenty-four-hour electrocardiogram (ECG) Holter revealed a significant burden of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), most of them originating from anterior papillary muscle (APM), posterior papillary muscle (PPM), and mitral annulus (MA). Quadrangular resection of P2 and mitral annuloplasty were performed. One year later, relapse of severe MR due to a residual P2M1 prolapse occurred. Twenty-four-hour ECG Holter showed no PVCs from PPM and MA, while those from APM persisted. A central edge-to-edge repair was effectively used to fix the residual prolapse. After 1 year from REDO surgery, a third ECG Holter confirmed the absence of any remaining LV PVCs, but still few ectopic beats originating from TV were recorded., Discussion: Here, we report a case of VA resolution after specific, anatomical triggers addressing surgical gestures. Our experience confirms that MV surgery may have a role in MVP patients' arrhythmias correction., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: The safety profile of transcatheter tricuspid valve (TTV) repair techniques is well established, but residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains a concern., Objectives: The authors sought to assess the impact of residual TR severity post-TTV repair on survival., Methods: We evaluated the survival rate at 2 years of 613 patients with severe isolated functional TR who underwent TTV repair in TRIGISTRY according to the severity of residual TR at discharge using a 3-grade (mild, moderate, and severe) or 4-grade scheme (mild, mild to moderate, moderate to severe, and severe)., Results: Residual TR was none/mild in 33%, moderate in 52%, and severe in 15%. The 2-year adjusted survival rates significantly differed between the 3 groups (85%, 70%, and 44%, respectively; restricted mean survival time [RMST]: P = 0.0001). When the 319 patients with moderate residual TR were subdivided into mild to moderate (n = 201, 33%) and moderate to severe (n = 118, 19%), the adjusted survival rate was also significantly different between groups (85%, 80%, 55%, and 44%, respectively; RMST: P = 0.001). Survival was significantly lower in patients with moderate to severe residual TR compared to patients with mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.006). No difference in survival rates was observed between patients with no/mild and mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.67) or between patients with moderate to severe and severe residual TR (P = 0.96)., Conclusions: The moderate residual TR group was heterogeneous and encompassed patients with markedly different clinical outcomes. Refining TR grade classification with a more granular 4-grade scheme improved outcome prediction. Our results highlight the importance of achieving a mild to moderate or lower residual TR grade during TTV repair, which could define a successful intervention., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Dreyfus has received speaker or proctoring fees from Abbott. Dr Kresoja has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Taramasso has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Shenqi Medical, PiCardia, CoreMedic, VentriMend, MEDIRA, CoreQuest, and HiD Imaging. Dr Iliadis has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Nombela-Franco has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Products and Features. Dr Estevez-Loureiro has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Venus Medtech. Dr Hausleiter has received grants and consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Stolz has received consulting or speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, MonarQ, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an Advisory Board member and/or member of the Steering/Executive Group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and has served as a member of the Steering/Executive Committee Group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Zamorano has received consulting or speaker fees from Novartis, Bayer, and Pfizer. Dr von Bardeleben has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Philips, and Siemens. Dr Tang has received speaker honoraria and has served as a physician proctor, consultant, Advisory Board member, TAVR Publications Committee Member, APOLLO Trial Screening Committee Member, and IMPACT MR Steering Committee member for Medtronic; has received speaker honoraria and has served as a physician proctor, consultant, Advisory Board member, and TRILUMINATE Trial Anatomic Eligibility and Publications Committee member for Abbott Structural Heart; has served as an Advisory Board member for Boston Scientific and JenaValve; has served as a consultant and Physician Screening Committee Member for Shockwave Medical; has served as a consultant for NeoChord, Peija Medical, and Shenqi Medical Technology; and has received speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthineers. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare. Dr Webb has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research funding from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lauten has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi, Chiesi, and AstraZeneca; and is a shareholder of the Devie Medical Drug Eluting Valve for Endocarditis Treatment. Dr Rodés-Cabau has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Nejjari has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Robocath. Dr Badano has received consulting or speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare, and Philips Medical Systems. Dr Himbert has received proctoring fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular. Dr Modine has received speaker or consulting fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Microport, and GE. Dr Rudolph has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Bax has received lecture fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lurz has received consulting fees from Abbott Medical, Innoventric, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Maisano has received grant and/or research institutional support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific Corporation, NVT, Terumo, Venus, and 3mensio; has received consulting fees and personal and institutional honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Xeltis, Cardiovalve, Occlufit, Simulands, Mtex, Venus, and Squadra; has received royalty income/IP rights from Edwards Lifesciences; and is a shareholder (including share options) in Cardiogard, Cardiovalve, Magenta, SwissVortex, Transseptalsolutions, and 4Tech. Dr Messika-Zeitoun has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary access (CA) is a major concern in redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for failing supra-annular self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs)., Aims: This ex vivo study evaluated the benefit of leaflet splitting (LS) on subsequent CA after redo-TAVI in anatomies deemed at high risk of unfeasible CA., Methods: Ex vivo, patient-specific models were printed three-dimensionally. Index TAVI was performed using ACURATE neo2 or Evolut PRO (TAV-1) at the standard implant depth and with different degrees of commissural misalignment (CMA). Redo-TAVI was performed using the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 Ultra (TAV-2) at different implant depths with commissural alignment. Selective CA was attempted for each configuration before and after LS in a pulsatile flow simulator. The leaflet splay area was assessed on the bench., Results: In matched comparisons of 128 coronary cannulations across 64 redo-TAVI configurations, the overall feasibility of CA significantly increased after LS (60.9% vs 18.7%; p<0.001). The effect of LS varied according to the sinotubular junction height, TAV-1 design, TAV-1 CMA, and TAV-2 implant depth, given TAV-2 alignment. LS enabled CA for up to CMA 45° with the ACURATE neo2 TAV-1 and up to CMA 30° with the Evolut PRO TAV-1. The combination of LS and a low TAV-2 implant provided the highest feasibility of CA after redo-TAVI. The leaflet splay area ranged from 25.60 mm2 to 37.86 mm2 depending on the TAV-1 platform and TAV-2 implant depth., Conclusions: In high-risk anatomies, LS significantly improves CA feasibility after redo-TAVI for degenerated supra-annular self-expanding platforms. Decisions on redo-TAVI feasibility should be carefully individualised, taking into account the expected benefit of LS on CA for each scenario.

Aims: T-TEER is an effective therapy for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, the effects of leaflets clipping on tricuspid valve annulus (TA) have not been investigated in detail. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) on TA diameter., Methods and Results: The TriValve registry (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies, NCT03416166) collected 556 patients from 22 European and North American centres undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions from 2016 to 2022. Patients undergoing T-TEER with available pre- and post-procedural data on TA diameter measured in the apical 4-chamber view on transthoracic echocardiography were selected for this study. Primary end-point was the reduction of TA diameter after T-TEER. A total of 186 patients were included in the study. In 115 patients (62%) TA diameter was reduced by at least 1 mm as compared to baseline. A significant reduction of TA dimension was observed following T-TEER (mean 2.3 mm [from pre-procedural diameter 46.7 mm to post-procedural diameter 44.4 mm], p < 0.001). In particular, the greatest reduction was observed in those with T-TEER in antero-septal commissure (mean 2.7 mm [from 47.1 mm to 44.4 mm], p < 0.001) as compared to those combining both antero-septal and postero-septal commissures (mean 1.4, from 46.0 mm to 44.6 mm, P = 0.06). A significant reduction of TA dimension was recorded in patients with 1 or 2 clips implanted but not in those patients with ≥3 clips implanted., Conclusions: In almost two third of patients T-TEER reduces TA diameter in addition to leaflet approximation., Condensed Abstract: The effects of tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) on tricuspid valve annulus (TA) have not been studied in details. This study investigates TA diameter as measured in apical 4-chamber view on transthoracic echocardiography before and after T-TEER. A total of 186 patients from the TriValve registry were included in the study. The study results show that 62% of patients have a TA reduction after T-TEER, especially in those receiving 1 or 2 clips in the antero-septal commissure. These suggest that T-TEER reduces tricuspid regurgitation not only by approximation of leaflets, but also by TA diameter reduction., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Currently, no clear impact of sex on short- and long-term survival following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) is evident, although no data are available on postprocedural life expectancy. Our aim was to assess sex-specific differences in outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated by TEER., Methods and Results: Short-term and 5-year outcomes in men and women undergoing TEER between 2011 and 2018 who were included in the large, multicenter, real-world MitraSwiss registry were analyzed. Outcomes were compared stratified by sex and according to MR cause (primary versus secondary). The impact of TEER on postprocedural life expectancy was estimated by relative survival analysis. Among 1142 patients aged 60 to 89 years, 39.8% were women. They were older, with fewer cardiovascular risk factors and lower functional capacity compared with men. Thirty-day mortality was higher in men than in women (3.3% versus 1.1%; odds ratio, 3.16 [95% CI, 1.16-10.7]; P =0.020). Five-year survival was comparable in both sexes (adjusted hazard ratio for 5-year mortality in men, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.90-1.44], P =0.275). Both men and women with either primary or secondary MR showed similar clinical efficacy over time. TEER provided high relative survival estimates among all groups, and fully restored predicted life expectancy in women with primary MR (5-year relative survival estimate, 97.4% [95% CI, 85.5-107.0])., Conclusions: TEER is not associated with increased short-term mortality in women, whereas 5-year outcomes are comparable between sexes. Moreover, TEER completely restored normal life expectancy in women with primary MR. A residual excess mortality persists in secondary MR, independently of sex.

Following the introduction in the latest European and American guidelines, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has become a valid alternative to surgery for ineligible patients. Among the available technologies, MitraClip (Abbott) was the first to be introduced for the percutaneous treatment of mitral regurgitation with the edge-to-edge technique. Although its safety and effectiveness has been widely demonstrated, the optimal procedural results are highly dependent from operators' experience. In this manuscript, we provide a full guide of advanced steering maneuvers of MitraClip in different scenarios of transseptal puncture., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The mitral valve (MV) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, caused by systolic anterior motion (SAM), is a common occurrence in most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and is directly associated with the MV apparatus. First line therapy for HOCM patients is pharmacological, and surgical intervention is often indicated for patients who do not respond to medical therapy. Emerging research on mitral disease in HOCM, specifically mitral regurgitation (MR), demonstrates that these patients frequently do not respond to standard therapeutic options, and can benefit from MV interventions. In this review, we describe the involvement of the MV in the pathogenesis of HOCM, discuss medical therapy, and explore available mitral procedures. Surgical myectomy, often combined with various modifications to the MV apparatus, is frequently necessary to achieve a durable resolution of LVOT obstruction and SAM-related MR. Alcohol septal ablation, an alternative to surgical myectomy, will be briefly mentioned. We also emphasize the role of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) as a promising and novel therapeutic option for HOCM patients. Over time, TEER has established itself as an effective and safe procedure, demonstrating success across a spectrum of anatomical variations. The leaflet modification and movement restriction achieved through TEER help reduce SAM and, consequently, have the potential to alleviate LVOT obstruction and SAM-related MR. Furthermore, we propose a treatment algorithm for cases where TEER is a potential course of action for patients who are at high risk for other interventions., (Copyright © 2023 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data on the prognostic role of the TRI-SCORE in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) are limited., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the TRI-SCORE in predicting outcomes of patients undergoing TTVI., Methods: TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) is a large multicenter multinational registry including patients undergoing TTVI. The TRI-SCORE is a risk model recently proposed to predict in-hospital mortality after tricuspid valve surgery. The TriValve population was stratified based on the TRI-SCORE tertiles. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization. Procedural complications and changes in NYHA functional class were also reported., Results: Among the 634 patients included, 223 patients (35.2%) had a TRI-SCORE between 0 and 5, 221 (34.8%) had 6 or 7, and 190 (30%) had ≥8 points. Postprocedural blood transfusion, acute kidney injury, new atrial fibrillation, and in-hospital mortality were more frequent in the highest TRI-SCORE tertile. Postprocedure length of stay increased with a TRI-SCORE increase. A TRI-SCORE ≥8 was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint assessed at a median follow-up of 186 days (OR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.38-6.55; HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.78-4.13; HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.57-2.74, respectively) even after adjustment for procedural success and EuroSCORE II or Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality. The NYHA functional class improved across all TRI-SCORE values., Conclusions: In the TriValve registry, the TRI-SCORE has a suboptimal performance in predicting clinical outcomes. However, a TRISCORE ≥8 is associated with an increased risk of clinical events and a lack of prognostic benefit after successful TTVI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Adamo has received speaker honoraria from Abbott. Dr Russo has received a fellowship training grant from the EAPCI sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Badano is on the Speaker Bureau of GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and EsaOte SpA; is currently serving on the Clinical Event Committee of Edwards Lifesciences; and is the director of the echocardiography core laboratory at the Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS for multiple industry-sponsored trials for which he receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Andreas is a proctor/consultant/speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Zoll; and has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI. Dr Denti has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Estevez-Loureiro is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Gavazzoni is a proctor for Abbott. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; has stock options with Navigate; and is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Nickenig has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Schofer is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sievert has received study honoraria to institution, travel expenses, and consulting fees from 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Adona Medical, Akura Medical, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Axon, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiac Success, Cardimed, Cardionovum, Celonova, Contego, Coramaze, Croivalve, CSL Behring LLC, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards Lifesciences, Endobar, Endologix, Endomatic, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Intershunt, Intervene, K2, Laminar, Lifetech, Magenta, Maquet Getinge Group, Metavention, Mitralix, Mokita, Neurotronic, NXT Biomedical, Occlutech, Recor, Renal Guard, Shifamed, Terumo, Trisol, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, Vivasure Medical, Vvital Biomed, and Whiteswell. Dr Tang has served as a physician proctor for Medtronic; has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott Structural Heart, and NeoChord; has served on the TAVR Advisory Board for Abbott Structural Heart; and has served on the Physician Advisory Board for JenaValve. Dr von Bardeleben has served for trials and principal investigator for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an Advisory Board member and/or member of the Steering/Executive Group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the Steering/Executive Committee Group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Maisano is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Perifect, Xeltis, Transseptal Solutions, Magenta, and Cardiovalve; has received grant support from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, and Terumo; has received royalties from Edwards Lifesciences and 4Tech; and is cofounder/shareholder of Transseptal Solutions, 4Tech, Cardiovalve, Magenta, Perifect, Coregard, and SwissVortex. Dr Metra has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Actelion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Edwards Therapeutics, Livanova, Servier, Vifor Pharma, and WindTree Therapeutics. Dr Taramasso has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, 4Tech, Boston Scientific, CoreMedic, Mitraltech, and SwissVortex outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Acute mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI) may be the result of papillary muscle rupture (PMR). This condition is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) in this acute setting., Methods and Results: We analysed data from the International Registry of MitraClip in Acute Mitral Regurgitation following acute Myocardial Infarction (IREMMI) of 30 centres in Europe, North America, and the middle east. We included patients with post-MI PMR treated with TEER as a salvage procedure, and we evaluated immediate and 30-day outcomes. Twenty-three patients were included in this analysis (9 patients suffered complete papillary muscle rupture, 9 partial and 5 chordal rupture). The patients' mean age was 68 ± 14 years. Patients were at high surgical risk with median EuroSCORE II 27% (IQR 16, 28) and 20 out of 23 (87% were in cardiogenic shock). All patients were treated with vasopressors, and 17 out of 23 patients required mechanical support. TEER procedure was performed on the median 6 days after the index MI date IQR (3, 11). Procedural success was achieved in 87% of patients. The grade of MR was significantly decreased after the procedure. MR reduction to 0 or 1 + was achieved in 13 patients (57%), to 2 + in 7 patients (30%), P < 0.01. V-Wave was reduced from 49 ± 8 mmHg to 26 ± 10 mmHg post-procedure, P < 0.01. Sixteen out of 23 patients (70%) were discharged from hospital and 5 of them required reintervention with surgical mitral valve replacement. No additional death at 1 year was documented., Conclusions: TEER is a feasible therapy in critically ill patients with PMR due to a recent MI. TEER may have a role as salvage treatment or bridge to surgery in this population., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Nowadays, the necessity of having a cardioplegia circuit capable of being adapted in order to administer different types of cardioplegia is strategically fundamental, both for the perfusionist and for the cardiac surgeon. This allows to avoid cutting tubes, guarantees sterility and, most of all, limits the number of cardioplegia circuits for the different strategies of cardiac arrest. The novel "ReverseTWO cardioplegia circuit system" is the development of the precedent "Reverse system" where mainly the 4:1 and crystalloid cardioplegia were used, It has the advantage of allowing immediate change of cardioplegia set-up versus four types of cardioplegia technique, when the strategy is unexpectedly changed before the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), is safe and enables the perfusionist to use one single custom pack of cardioplegia. Two pediatric roller pumps are usually used in our centre for cardioplegia administration; they have a standardized calibration (the leading with ¼ inch and the follower with 1/8 inch) and the circuit consequently has two different tube diameters for the two different pumps. The presence in the circuit of two different shunts coupled with two different coloured clamps allows the immediate set-up for different cardioplegia administration techniques utilizing a colour-coding mechanism The aim of this manuscript is to present the new ReverseTWO Circuit. This novel system allows to administer four different cardioplegic solutions (4:1, 1:4, crystalloid, ematic) based on multiple tubes, which can be selectively clamped, identified through a color-coding method. The specificity of this circuit is the great versatility, which leads to numerous advantages, such as reduced risk of perfusion accident and reduced costs related not only to the purchase of different cardioplegia kits but also to the storage. https://youtu.be/ovJBE4ok2Ds., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) are emerging as alternatives to surgery in high-risk patients with isolated or concomitant tricuspid regurgitation. The development of new minimally invasive solutions potentially more adapted to this largely undertreated population of patients, has fuelled the interest for the tricuspid valve. Growing evidence and new concepts have contributed to revise obsolete and misleading perceptions around the right side of the heart. New definitions, classifications, and a better understanding of the disease pathophysiology and phenotypes, as well as their associated patient journeys have profoundly and durably changed the landscape of tricuspid disease. A number of registries and a recent randomized controlled pivotal trial provide preliminary guidance for decision-making. TTVI seem to be very safe and effective in selected patients, although clinical benefits beyond improved quality of life remain to be demonstrated. Even if more efforts are needed, increased disease awareness is gaining momentum in the community and supports the establishment of dedicated expert valve centres. This review is summarizing the achievements in the field and provides perspectives for a less invasive management of a no-more-forgotten disease., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation (A-STR) is a distinct phenotype of secondary tricuspid regurgitation with predominant dilation of the right atrium and normal right and left ventricular function. Atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation occurs most commonly in elderly women with atrial fibrillation and in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm. In A-STR, the main mechanism of leaflet malcoaptation is related to the presence of a significant dilation of the tricuspid annulus secondary to right atrial enlargement. In addition, there is an insufficient adaptive growth of tricuspid valve leaflets that become unable to cover the enlarged annular area. As opposed to the ventricular phenotype, in A-STR, the tricuspid valve leaflet tethering is typically trivial. The A-STR phenotype accounts for 10%-15% of clinically relevant tricuspid regurgitation and has better outcomes compared with the more prevalent ventricular phenotype. Recent data suggest that patients with A-STR may benefit from more aggressive rhythm control and timely valve interventions. However, little is mentioned in current guidelines on how to identify, evaluate, and manage these patients due to the lack of consistent evidence and variable definitions of this entity in recent investigations. This interdisciplinary expert opinion document focusing on A-STR is intended to help physicians understand this complex and rapidly evolving topic by reviewing its distinct pathophysiology, diagnosis, and multi-modality imaging characteristics. It first defines A-STR by proposing specific quantitative criteria for defining the atrial phenotype and for discriminating it from the ventricular phenotype, in order to facilitate standardization and consistency in research., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Early studies of the Tendyne transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) showed promising results in a small selective cohort., Objectives: The authors present 1-year data from the currently largest commercial, real-world cohort originating from the investigator-initiated TENDER (Tendyne European Experience) registry., Methods: All patients from the TENDER registry eligible for 1-year follow-up were included. The primary safety endpoint was 1-year cardiovascular mortality. Primary performance endpoint was reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) up to 1 year., Results: Among 195 eligible patients undergoing TMVR (median age 77 years [Q1-Q3: 71-81 years], 60% men, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality 5.6% [Q1-Q3: 3.6%-8.9%], 81% in NYHA functional class III or IV, 94% with MR 3+/4+), 31% had "real-world" indications for TMVR (severe mitral annular calcification, prior mitral valve treatment, or others) outside of the instructions for use. The technical success rate was 95%. The cardiovascular mortality rate was 7% at 30 day and 17% at 1 year (all-cause mortality rates were 9% and 29%, respectively). Reintervention or surgery following discharge was 4%, while rates of heart failure hospitalization reduced from 68% in the preceding year to 25% during 1-year follow-up. Durable MR reduction to ≤1+ was achieved in 98% of patients, and at 1 year, 83% were in NYHA functional class I or II. There was no difference in survival and major adverse events between on-label use and "real-world" indications up to 1 year., Conclusions: This large, real-world, observational registry reports high technical success, durable and complete MR elimination, significant clinical benefits, and a 1-year cardiovascular mortality rate of 17% after Tendyne TMVR. Outcomes were comparable between on-label use and "real-world" indications, offering a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients without alternative treatments. (Tendyne European Experience Registry [TENDER]; NCT04898335)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The TENDER study was carried out without financial support from industry. It was initiated as an academic investigator trial by LMU University Hospital and Universitätsmedizin Mainz. Dr Baldus has received research grants and honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Rudolph has received speaker honoraria from Abbott. Dr Andreas has received proctoring, consulting, and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston, Zoll, and AbbVie; and institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI. Dr Duncan has received consulting fees and honoraria from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, NeoChord. Dr Nombela serves as a physician proctor for and has received advisory fees from Abbott Cardiovascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Products + Features. Dr Ruge serves as a physician proctor for and has received advisory fees from Abbott Medical. Dr Conradi serves as an advisory board member for Abbott, Medtronic, and JenaValve; and is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, MicroPort, Pi-Cardia. Dr Dumonteil has received consulting and proctoring fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Barth has received speaker and advisory fees from Abbott Cardiovascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Adamo has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Maisano has received grant and/or research institutional support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, New Valve Technology, Terumo, and Venus; has received consulting fees and personal and institutional honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Xeltis, Cardiovalve, Occlufit, Simulands, MTEX Cardio, Venus, and Squadra; has received royalty income from and holds intellectual property rights with Edwards Lifesciences; is a shareholder (including share options) in CardioGard, Cardiovalve, Magenta, SwissVortex, Transseptal Solutions, 4Tech, and Perifect. Dr Lurz has received honoraria from ReCor Medical and Innoventric; and has received institutional grants from Edwards Lifesciences and ReCor. Dr Hausleiter has received speaker fees, research support, and advisory fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr von Bardeleben has received speaker or advisory fees from Abbott Cardiovascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, NeoChord, Philips, and Siemens; and has conducted unpaid trial activity for Abbott Cardiovascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Jenscare Scientific, Medtronic, and NeoChord. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Benefit of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) correction and timing of intervention are unclear. This study aimed to compare survival rates after surgical or transcatheter intervention to conservative management according to a TR clinical stage as assessed using the TRI-SCORE., Methods: A total of 2,413 patients with severe isolated functional TR were enrolled in TRIGISTRY (1217 conservatively managed, 551 isolated tricuspid valve surgery, and 645 transcatheter valve repair). The primary endpoint was survival at 2 years., Results: The TRI-SCORE was low (≤3) in 32%, intermediate (4-5) in 33%, and high (≥6) in 35%. A successful correction was achieved in 97% and 65% of patients in the surgical and transcatheter groups, respectively. Survival rates decreased with the TRI-SCORE in the three treatment groups (all P < .0001). In the low TRI-SCORE category, survival rates were higher in the surgical and transcatheter groups than in the conservative management group (93%, 87%, and 79%, respectively, P = .0002). In the intermediate category, no significant difference between groups was observed overall (80%, 71%, and 71%, respectively, P = .13) but benefit of the intervention became significant when the analysis was restricted to patients with successful correction (80%, 81%, and 71%, respectively, P = .009). In the high TRI-SCORE category, survival was not different to conservative management in the surgical and successful repair group (61% and 68% vs 58%, P = .26 and P = .18 respectively)., Conclusions: Survival progressively decreased with the TRI-SCORE irrespective of treatment modality. Compared to conservative management, an early and successful surgical or transcatheter intervention improved 2-year survival in patients at low and, to a lower extent, intermediate TRI-SCORE, while no benefit was observed in the high TRI-SCORE category., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an established procedure for managing mitral regurgitation (MR) in high-risk patients. It is effective in treating both primary and secondary MR, as reported in the surgical and interventional literature. Over time, TEER has gained popularity and achieved procedural success in various anatomies. The less invasive nature of TEER, along with its high safety profile and immediate haemodynamic improvement suggest potential benefits in high-risk populations who are not normally included in major trials. These patients, often deemed unsuitable for surgical intervention, are typically managed conservatively, despite accumulating evidence suggesting the potential of clinical improvement by reducing MR through TEER. Examples include post-myocardial infarction MR, patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and patients experiencing recurrent MR after surgical intervention. This review discusses the utilisation of TEER beyond recognised indications, examining outcomes and limitations in diverse patient populations. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the benefits of TEER in clinical scenarios beyond the current indications.

The role of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is increasingly recognized as an independent clinical entity. Hence, interventional TR treatment options continuously evolve, surgical risk assessment and peri-operative care improve the management of CIED-related TR, and the role of lead extraction is of high interest. Furthermore, novel surgical and interventional tricuspid valve treatment options are increasingly applied to patients suffering from TR associated with or related to CIEDs. This multidisciplinary review article developed with electrophysiologists, interventional cardiologists, imaging specialists, and cardiac surgeons aims to give an overview of the mechanisms of disease, diagnostics, and proposes treatment algorithms of patients suffering from TR associated with CIED lead(s) or leadless pacemakers., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: As a consequence of untimely or missed revascularization of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients died at home or survived with serious sequelae, resulting in potential long-term worse prognosis and related health-economic implications.This analysis sought to predict long-term health outcomes [survival and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] and cost of reduced treatment of STEMIs occurring during the first COVID-19 lockdown., Methods and Results: Using a Markov decision-analytic model, we incorporated probability of hospitalization, timeliness of PCI, and projected long-term survival and cost (including societal costs) of mortality and morbidity, for STEMI occurring during the first UK and Spanish lockdowns, comparing them with expected pre-lockdown outcomes for an equivalent patient group.STEMI patients during the first UK lockdown were predicted to lose an average of 1.55 life-years and 1.17 QALYs compared with patients presenting with a STEMI pre-pandemic. Based on an annual STEMI incidence of 49 332 cases, the total additional lifetime costs calculated at the population level were £36.6 million (€41.3 million), mainly driven by costs of work absenteeism. Similarly in Spain, STEMI patients during the lockdown were expected to survive 2.03 years less than pre-pandemic patients, with a corresponding reduction in projected QALYs (-1.63). At the population level, reduced PCI access would lead to additional costs of €88.6 million., Conclusion: The effect of a 1-month lockdown on STEMI treatment led to a reduction in survival and QALYs compared to the pre-pandemic era. Moreover, in working-age patients, untimely revascularization led to adverse prognosis, affecting societal productivity and therefore considerably increasing societal costs., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation are common and strongly associated with poor quality of life and an increased risk of heart failure hospitalizations and death. While medical therapy for right-sided heart failure is limited, treatment options for tricuspid regurgitation include surgery and, based on recent developments, several transcatheter interventions. However, the patients who might benefit from tricuspid valve interventions are yet unknown, as is the ideal time for these treatments given the paucity of clinical evidence. In this context, it is crucial to elucidate aetiology and pathophysiological mechanisms leading to right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation in order to recognize when tricuspid regurgitation is a mere bystander and when it can cause or contribute to heart failure progression. Notably, early identification of right heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation may be crucial and optimal management requires knowledge about the different mechanisms and causes, clinical course and presentation, as well as possible treatment options. The aim of this clinical consensus statement is to summarize current knowledge about epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment of tricuspid regurgitation in right-sided heart failure providing practical suggestions for patient identification and management., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aim: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a mainstay in the management of severe aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients, but there is uncertainty on their long-term effectiveness. We aimed to assess the long-term outcome of patients undergoing TAVI with the Portico valve., Methods: We retrospectively collected the data on patients in whom TAVI with Portico was attempted from 7 high-volume centres. Only patients theoretically eligible for 3 or more years of follow-up were included. Clinical outcomes, including death, stroke, myocardial infarction, reintervention for valve degeneration and hemodynamic valve performance were systematically assessed., Results: A total of 803 patients were included, with 504 (62.8%) women, mean age of 82 years, median EuroSCORE II of 3.1%, and 386 (48.1%) subjects at low/moderate risk. The median follow-up was 3.0 years (3.0; 4.0). The composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and reintervention for valve degeneration occurred in 37.5% (95% confidence interval: 34.1-40.9%), with all-cause death in 35.1% (31.8-38.4%), stroke in 3.4% (1.3-3.4%), myocardial infarction in 1.0% (0.3-1.5%), and reintervention for valve degeneration in 1.1% (0.6-2.1%). The mean aortic valve gradient at follow-up was 8.1 ± 4.6 mmHg, and at least moderate aortic regurgitation was present in 9.1% (6.7-12.3%). Independent predictors of major adverse events or death were: peripheral artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, atrial fibrillation, prior pacemaker implantation, EuroSCORE II, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Portico use is associated with favorable long-term clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes were largely impacted by baseline risk factors and surgical risk., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a highly prevalent and heterogeneous valvular disease, independently associated with excess mortality and high morbidity in all clinical contexts. TR is profoundly undertreated by surgery and is often discovered late in patients presenting with right-sided heart failure. To address the issue of undertreatment and poor clinical outcomes without intervention, numerous structural tricuspid interventional devices have been and are in development, a challenging process due to the unique anatomic and physiological characteristics of the tricuspid valve, and warranting well-designed clinical trials. The path from routine practice TR detection to appropriate TR evaluation, to conduction of clinical trials, to enriched therapeutic possibilities for improving TR access to treatment and outcomes in routine practice is complex. Therefore, this paper summarizes the key points and methods crucial to TR detection, quantitation, categorization, risk-scoring, intervention-monitoring, and outcomes evaluation, particularly of right-sided function, and to clinical trial development and conduct, for both interventional and surgical groups., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Polares Medical, and Medira. Dr Sorajja has served as a consultant for 4C Medical, Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Foldax, GE Medical, Medtronic, Philips, Shifamed, Siemens, WL Gore, vDyne, and xDot. Dr Cavalcante has received consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott Structural, Anteris, AriaCV, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, VDyne, WL Gore, and Xylocor; and has received research grants from Abbott Northwestern Hospital Foundation and Abbott Structural. Dr Sitges has received speaker honoraria and consultant fees for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and General Electric. Dr Taramasso has acted as a consultant and/or received consultancy fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifescience, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Shenqi Medical, MEDIRA, Cardiovalve, VentriMend, Simulands, MTEx, Occlufit, CoreMedic, and HeD Imaging; has received an institutional educational grant from Edwards Lifescience and Abbott; and has served on the advisory board for Abbott. Dr Messika-Zeitoun has received research grant from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Dreyfus has served as a proctor for Abbott. Dr Rudski has small holding of shares in General Electric. Dr Bax has received lecture fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received unrestricted research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. Dr Stephan von Bardeleben has received research support for trials from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Jenavalve, Jenscare, Medtronic, and Neochord. Dr Redwood has served as a proctor and received speaker fees from Edwards; he has also served as on the international advisory board member for Medtronic. Dr Bapat has served as a consultant with Edwards Lifescienes, Medtronic, and Abbott; and has received a research grant from Atricure. Dr Nickenig has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from Abbott, Cardiovalve, Edwards, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Dr Hausleiter has received research support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; she is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Maisano has received grant and/or research institutional support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific Corporation, NVT, and Terumo; has received consulting fees, honoraria personal and institutional from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Xeltis, Cardiovalve, Occlufit, Simulands, and Mtex; has received royalty income rights from Edwards Lifesciences; and is a shareholder (including share options) of Cardiogard, Cardiovalve, Magenta, SwissVortex, Transseptalsolutions, 4Tech, and Perifect. Dr Enriquez-Sarano has received consulting fees from Artivion, ChemImage, Edwards Lifescience, HighLife, and Corcym. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)