1. Impact of psychotropic pro re nata prescription-monitoring programme on prescriptions for inpatients with psychiatric disorders: a retrospective observational study.
- Author
-
Saito Y, Sumida K, Muraoka H, Oishi S, Suzuki R, Nishikawa T, Miyake S, Tanno Y, Tobita Y, Otori K, and Inada K
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Drug Prescriptions statistics & numerical data, Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, Aged, Polypharmacy, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Psychiatric Department, Hospital statistics & numerical data, Mental Disorders drug therapy, Psychotropic Drugs therapeutic use, Inpatients
- Abstract
Background: Pro re nata (PRN) medication is used "as needed" for symptoms such as agitation and insomnia, in addition to regular daily pharmacotherapy of mental disorders. However, there is no high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of psychotropic PRN medications and concerns have been raised about their potential to contribute to polypharmacy. This study introduced a psychotropic PRN prescription-monitoring programme for psychiatric inpatients with the aim of examining the change before and after the implementation of the programme., Method: This study included 389 patients admitted to the psychiatric department between 1 July 2021 and 30 June 2023. The psychotropic PRN prescription-monitoring programme was implemented in July 2022, and the participants were classified into monitoring and non-monitoring groups. Demographic data (age, sex, and diagnosis), regular prescriptions before admission and at discharge, psychotropic PRN prescriptions before admission and at discharge, and the total number of psychotropic PRN prescriptions during hospitalisation were compared between the two groups. Data on psychotropic prescription were collected by psychotropic category. The significance level of 5% was set at 1.67 × 10
-3 using the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing., Results: The psychotropic PRN prescription ratio at discharge in the monitoring group was 9.3%, which was significantly lower than the 28.1% in the non-monitoring group. The percentage of patients with a PRN prescription during hospitalisation in the monitoring group was 29.8%, which was significantly lower than the 64.5% in the non-monitoring group. In the non-monitoring group, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of psychotropic drugs prescribed regularly before and after admission. However, in the monitoring group, the number of psychotropic drugs in the regular prescriptions at discharge was 1.87 ± 1.24, which was significantly lower than 2.47 ± 1.90 in the regular prescription before admission., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a psychotropic PRN prescription-monitoring programme may contribute to the elimination of polypharmacy, including regular prescriptions. Further research is required to optimise psychotropic PRN prescriptions and reduce polypharmacy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kitasato University Hospital (approval no. B23-074, date of approval: 27 September 2023) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. As this was a retrospective observational study using existing medical information, the need for signed informed consent from the patients was waived by the Kitasato University Hospital Ethics Committee. Patients were informed about the purpose and procedures of the study and were given the option to opt-out. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interest: Hiroyuki Muraoka received honoraria from Eisai, Merck, Otsuka, Meiji Seika, Yoshitomi Pharmaceuticals, Sumitomo Pharma, Viatris, Janssen, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Japan, and KYOWA Pharmaceutical Industry. Satoru Oishi has received honoraria from Otsuka, Meiji Seika Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Towa Pharmaceuticals, Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries, Sumitomo Pharma, and Viatris. Taiyo Nishikawa has received an honorarium from Sumitomo Pharma. Ken Inada received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Lundbeck Japan, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida, MSD, Nipro, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shionogi, Sumitomo Pharma, Yoshitomiyakuhin, and Viatris, and he received research grant support from Mochida and Sumitomo Pharma. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2025. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF