1. Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization following radical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-center retrospective study
- Author
-
Jing Dong Li, Lei Wang, Xin Yu Bi, Jian Wang, Zi Guo Lin, Shi Cheng, Jian Ming Wang, Shu Guo Zheng, Yong Yi Zeng, Wei Guo, Qiao Ke, Jian Ying Lou, Ya Min Zheng, Wei Ping Zhou, and Fu-Yu Li
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,propensity score matching ,business.industry ,overall survival ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Retrospective cohort study ,Subgroup analysis ,transarterial chemoembolization ,TNM staging system ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oncology ,intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Propensity score matching ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Stage (cooking) ,business ,Adjuvant ,Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ,Research Paper - Abstract
Background and Aims: The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after radical resection is far from satisfactory, but the effect of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (p-TACE) remains controversial. This multi-center retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical value of p-TACE and identify the selected patients who would benefit from p-TACE. Methods: Data of ICC patients who underwent radical resection with/without p-TACE therapy was obtained from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between Jan 2014 and Jan 2017. Overall survival (OS) was set as the primary endpoint, which was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the established staging system and survival risk stratification. Results: A total of 335 patients were enrolled in this study, including 39 patients in the p-TACE group and 296 patients in the non-TACE group. Median OS in the p-TACE group was longer than that in the non-TACE group (63.0 months vs. 18.0 months, P=0.041), which was confirmed after 1:1 PSM (P=0.009). According to the 8th TNM staging system, patients with stage II and stage III stage would be benefited from p-TACE (P=0.021). Subgroup analysis stratified by risk factors showed that p-TACE could only benefit patients with risk factors
- Published
- 2020