Search

IMPORTANCE: Antiangiogenic drug combinations with anti–programmed cell death 1 protein and anti–programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents are a novel treatment option for lung cancer. However, survival remains limited, and the activity of these combinations for tumors with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical benefits and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for patients with high-TMB advanced nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial (Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in First-Line NSCLC Patients [TELMA]) included treatment-naive patients aged 18 years or older with confirmed stage IIIB-IV nonsquamous NSCLC with TMB of 10 or more mutations/megabase and no EGFR, ALK, STK11, MDM2, or ROS1 alterations. From May 2019 through January 2021, patients were assessed at 13 sites in Spain, with follow-up until February 28, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were given atezolizumab, 1200 mg, plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment was continued until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, patient withdrawal, investigator decision, or death. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1 criteria); PFS was defined as the time from enrollment to disease progression or death. Adverse events were monitored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were assessed for trial eligibility, of whom 266 were ineligible for enrollment. Of the 41 patients enrolled, 3 did not fulfill all inclusion criteria and were excluded. The remaining 38 patients (28 [73.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 63.7 [8.3] years) constituted the per-protocol population. The 12-month PFS rate was 51.3% (95% CI, 34.2%-66.0%), which met the primary end point. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 72.0% (95% CI, 54.1%-83.9%). The median PFS was 13.0 months (95% CI, 7.9-18.0 months), and the median OS was not reached. Of the 38 patients, 16 (42.1%) achieved an objective response and 30 (78.9%) achieved disease control. The median time to response was 2.8 months (IQR, 2.8-3.58 months), with a median duration of response of 11.7 months (range, 3.57-22.4 months; the response was ongoing at cutoff). Of 16 responses, 8 (50.0%) were ongoing. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. For atezolizumab, the most common adverse events were fatigue (6 [15.8%]) and pruritus (6 [15.8%]). For bevacizumab, they were hypertension (10 [26.3%]) and proteinuria (4 [10.5%]). Drug discontinuation occurred in 2 patients receiving atezolizumab (5.3%) and 3 patients receiving bevacizumab (7.9%). PD-L1 levels were not associated with response, PFS, or OS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that atezolizumab with bevacizumab is a potential treatment for high-TMB nonsquamous NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03836066

RETinhibitors with impressive overall response rates are now available for patients with NSCLC, yet the identification of RETfusions remains a difficult challenge. Most guidelines encourage the upfront use of next-generation sequencing (NGS), or alternatively, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) when NGS is not possible or available. Taken together, the suboptimal performance of single-analyte assays to detect RETfusions, although consistent with the notion of encouraging universal NGS, is currently widening some of the clinical practice gaps in the implementation of predictive biomarkers in patients with advanced NSCLC.

IMPORTANCE: Therapies targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor or its ligand (PD-L1), such as the humanized monoclonal antibody durvalumab, have shown durable clinical responses in several tumor types. However, concerns about the safety and feasibility of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in HIV-1–infected individuals have led to the exclusion of these patients from clinical trials on cancer immunotherapies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of durvalumab treatment in patients with advanced cancer and virologically controlled HIV-1 infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The DURVAST study was a nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial in patients with any solid tumor type in which anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 antibodies have approved indications or for which there are data of antitumoral activity with no other available curative therapy. All patients had basal undetectable plasma viremia while undergoing combination antiretroviral therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment consisted of intravenous infusion of durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adverse events were graded with the use of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Tumor response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: A total of 20 HIV-1–infected patients with advanced cancer were enrolled; 16 (80%) were male, the median (range) age was 54 (30-73) years, and 12 (60%) had progressed with previous cancer treatment lines. A median (range) of 4 (1-16) cycles of durvalumab were administered. Drug-related adverse events were observed in 50% of patients, and all were grade 1 and 2 (mainly diarrhea, asthenia, and arthromyalgia). Four of 16 response-evaluable patients (25%) had a partial response. Five patients (31%) had stable disease, including 4 with durable stable disease (disease control rate of 50%). CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts and plasma HIV-1 viremia remained stable throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Durvalumab treatment was feasible and safe in HIV-1–infected patients with cancer receiving combination antiretroviral therapy. HIV-1–infected patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy with advanced cancer should have access to cancer immunotherapy treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03094286

Osimertinib has proven efficacy in EGFRT790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, its benefits have not been evaluated in a real-world setting.

The ROS1gene rearrangement has become an important biomarker in NSCLC. The College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology testing guidelines support the use of ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening test, followed by confirmation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a molecular test in all positive results. We have evaluated a novel anti-ROS1 IHC antibody (SP384) in a large multicenter series to obtain real-world data.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy is generally ineffective in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We assessed the intravenous perfusion of doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in whom previous sorafenib therapy had failed.

Partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) is essential for homologous recombination repair. We examined mRNA levels of DNA repair genes, including partner and localizer of BRCA2 gene (PALB2), ring finger protein 8 gene (RNF8),replication timing regulatory factor 1 gene (RIF1),ATM serine/threonine kinase gene (ATM), and tumor protein p53 binding protein 1 gene (53BP1) as predictive biomarkers for cisplatin-docetaxel in the European phase III BRCA1, DNA repair associated (BRCA1)–receptor-associated protein 80 (RAP80) expression customization (BREC) phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.govidentifier NCT00617656).

The cost-effectiveness of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR)-mutated advanced-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poorly documented. We therefore conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy in European patients with advanced-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were enrolled in the European Erlotinib versus Chemotherapy trial.

IMPORTANCE: The EURTAC trial demonstrated the greater efficacy of erlotinib compared with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of European patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring oncogenic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation in exon 21) in tumor tissue. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using circulating free DNA (cfDNA) from blood samples as a surrogate for tumor biopsy for determining EGFR mutation status and to correlate EGFR mutations in cfDNA with outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prespecified analysis was a secondary objective of the EURTAC trial using patients included in the EURTAC trial from 2007 to 2011 with available baseline serum or plasma samples. Patients had advanced NSCLC, oncogenic EGFR mutations in the tumor, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and were treated with erlotinib or chemotherapy. EGFR mutations were examined in cfDNA isolated from 97 baseline blood samples by our novel peptide nucleic acid–mediated 5´ nuclease real-time polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan) assay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy were correlated with type of EGFR mutations in cfDNA. RESULTS: In samples from 76 of 97 (78%) patients with usable blood samples, EGFR mutations in cfDNA were detected. Median OS was shorter in patients with the L858R mutation in cfDNA than in those with the exon 19 deletion (13.7 [95% CI, 7.1-17.7] vs 30.0 [95% CI, 19.3-37.7] months; P < .001). Univariate analyses of patients with EGFR mutations in cfDNA identified the L858R mutation in tumor tissue or in cfDNA as a marker of shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.70 [95% CI, 1.60-4.56]; P < .001) and PFS (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.20-3.48]; P = .008). For patients with the L858R mutation in tissue, median OS was 13.7 (95% CI, 7.1-17.7) months for patients with the L858R mutation in cfDNA and 27.7 (95% CI, 16.1-46.2) months for those in whom the mutation was not detected in cfDNA (HR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.09-4.52]; P = .03). In the multivariate analysis of the 76 patients with EGFR mutations in cfDNA, only erlotinib treatment remained an independent predictor of longer PFS (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.23-0.74]; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The peptide nucleic acid–mediated 5´ nuclease real-time polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan) assay used in this study can be used to efficiently assess EGFR mutations in cfDNA. The L858R mutation in cfDNA may be a novel surrogate prognostic marker. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00446225

Importance of the field:Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a disseminated disease in 50% of cases, with a gloomy prognosis and median survivals of < 1 year.Areas covered in this review:Based on substantial advances, cancer biology insights and novel biotechnology tools, customized treatment provides hints that cisplatin-based treatment can be optimized in favorable subgroups of patients according to gene expression DNA repair profiles. In 2004, it was discovered that 10 – 15% of NSCLC can harbor a new class of EGFR mutation conferring specific sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.What the reader will gain:The homologous recombination pathway provides information for customizing cisplatin-based chemotherapy. BRCA1 plays a central role in this pathway that can be used in tailoring chemotherapy. Patient subgroups can obtain significant increases in progression-free survival. For EGFR lung-addicted cancers, treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors like erlotinib provide impressive improvement in progression-free survival – up to 14 months with significant enhanced survival.Take home message:Customized chemotherapy based on BRCA1 models can contribute to demonstrating this approach's clinical relevance, and the implementation of EGFR mutation assessment is warranted to identify EGFR-addicted lung cancers with a different prognosis that could benefit from a specifically targeted therapy approach.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the metabolic pathways of S-adenosylmethionine have been related to global hypomethylation and a lower number of hypermethylated CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes. Hypermethylation of checkpoint and DNA repair genes has been shown to be indicative of chemosensitivity. In the present study, we have examined the SNP of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, which affects DNA methylation patterns and is linked to elevated plasma homocysteine levels in 208 patients with gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No differences in response rate were observed according to the MTHFR genotype. However, time to progression was 7.4 months for 68 patients with CC genotype, 5.5 months for 108 patients with heterozygous CT genotype, and 5.2 months for 28 patients with TT genotype. These findings can lead us to distinguish different outcome patterns among patients with stage IV NSCLC whose similar clinical prognostic factors would otherwise indicate similar outcomes. Carriers of the MTHFR 677T allele could benefit from supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B12. The Spanish Lung Cancer Group has undertaken a phase III randomized trial to elucidate this concept.

This phase II study assessed the activity and toxicity profile of the sequential administration of 3 cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2every 3 weeks) followed by 3 cycles of AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; 60/600 mg/m2every 3 weeks) as first-line chemotherapy in 30 patients with metastatic breast cancer. The response rate was 60% after docetaxel and 73% after AC. This reflected an increase in the rate of complete response (from 7% after docetaxel to 17% after AC). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, and the median time to progression was 12.6 months. The median survival time had not been reached after a median follow-up of 23.2 months. The sequential treatment was generally well tolerated, with grade 3/4 neutropenia found in 20% and 14% of patients treated with docetaxel and AC, respectively. No cumulative myelosuppression was detected. The incidence of grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities was low. The sequential administration of docetaxel followed by AC showed a high antitumor activity and a good safety profile. The hematologic toxicity found is markedly lower than that found using concomitant chemotherapy with the same drugs. Our results support the design of phase III trials that directly compare a sequential schedule with a concomitant schedule of docetaxel plus AC (or with doxorubicin only), focusing on the toxicity profile.

The authors undertook a Phase II multicenter trial to assess the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin and paclitaxel in combination in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. Doxorubicin (50 mg/m², bolus) followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m² over 3 hours) was administered every 21 days (for a maximum of 10 cycles) as first-line chemotherapy in 77 patients, 41 of whom had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Monitoring of cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction[LVEF]) and total doxorubicin cumulative dose were included in the study protocol. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (58%) and thrombocytopenia (4%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 9% of patients. Nonhematologic Grade 4 toxicity was limited to mucositis (3%). Grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (35%), anemia (3%), alopecia (93%), peripheral neuropathy (18%), arthralgia/myalgia (8%), and mucositis (9%). No clinical cardiotoxicity (Grades 3 or 4) occurred. Treatment was discontinued in 5 patients who showed a decrease of LVEF of greater than 15% during therapy. Of 73 patients assessable for response, 15 were complete response, 42 partial response, 15 stable disease, and 1 disease progression; overall response rate being 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67–87). Median follow-up was 22 months. Median time to progression (TP) was 10 months (95% CI, 7–12). Time to progression was poorer in cases with adjuvant anthracycline therapy than those without adjuvant chemotherapy (7 vs. 12.3 months; P = 0.022), but TP in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy not containing anthracyclines was not different from the cases without adjuvant chemotherapy (8.6 months). Estimated 2-year survival was 51% (standard error, 7%). Our results confirm that the combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin is effective in the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma, and that it is well tolerated. No clinical cardiotoxicity was observed on close cardiac monitoring, and prior adjuvant anthracycline treatment compromised its efficacy. Cancer 2000;89:2169–75. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

Aim:To estimate management cost of NSCLC ALK+ patients with and without brain metastasis (BM), and to compare annual costs in patients treated with alectinib or crizotinib. Methods:Management cost/year (€ 2018) in patients with and without BM was estimated with disaggregated resource consumption provided by local oncologists, including medical visits, hospitalizations, diagnostic/laboratory tests, imaging techniques and surgical procedures. The comparison of costs/year with alectinib and crizotinib, considered the cumulative 12-month incidence of BM in ALEX trial (9.4 and 41.4%, respectively). Results:Management cost was €6173.42/patient-year without BM and €21,637.50/patient-year with BM. With alectinib, average cost/patient was lower than crizotinib (€4948.51/patient-year) Conclusion:Prevention of BM with alectinib may result in reductions of cost/year in the management of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

A case of relapsing bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia complicated by malignant lymphoma (four years after the diagnosis) is reported in a 58-year-old woman. To our knowledge, such an association has not been described previously in detail in the literature.